Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Chemistry / 2016 / Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 2

Impregnation of different ionic liquids onto cationic starch and their comparisonin the extraction of Th(IV)

Sayfa
364–372
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The elution occurred with HCland NaOH solutions at pH 7.0.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Cationic starch (CS) was prepared by using epichlorohydrin (EPI) and 3-chloro-2-hydroxypropyltrimethy-lammonium chloride (CHPTMA) and ionic liquids (ILs) having different anionic groups [1-butyl-3-methyl imida-zolium tetra uoroborate (BMI+BF4), 1-butyl-3-methyl imidazolium bromide (BMI+Br), 1-butyl-3-methyl imida-zolium hexa uorophosphate (BMI+PF6), and 1-butyl-3-methyl imidazolium bis-[(tri uoromethyl)sulfonyl]imide (BMI+[(TF)2N])] were impregnated onto CS.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Thorium(IV) ions were preconcentrated by using IL impregnated CS.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The elution occurred with HCland NaOH solutions at pH 7.0.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Cationic starch (CS) was prepared by using epichlorohydrin (EPI) and 3-chloro-2-hydroxypropyltrimethy-lammonium chloride (CHPTMA) and ionic liquids (ILs) having different anionic groups [1-butyl-3-methyl imida-zolium tetra uoroborate (BMI+BF4), 1-butyl-3-methyl imidazolium bromide (BMI+Br), 1-butyl-3-methyl imida-zolium hexa uorophosphate (BMI+PF6), and 1-butyl-3-methyl imidazolium bis-[(tri uoromethyl)sulfonyl]imide (BMI+[(TF)2N])] were impregnated onto CS. Thorium(IV) ions were preconcentrated by using IL impregnated CS. The ef-fects of ILs were investigated for extraction of Th(IV) by CS and the results were compared. Th(IV) was preconcentratedwith approximately 73% sorption capacity by CS and increased up to 98%{100% for IL impregnated sorbents at pH 7.0.The sorption capacities of Th(IV) were 0.453 mmol g1, 0.399 mmol g1, 0.281 mmol g1, and 0.183 mmol g1forCS{BMI+Br, CS{BMI+[(TF)2N], CS{BMI+PF6and CS{BMI+BF4, respectively. The elution occurred with HCland NaOH solutions at pH 7.0.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

YURDAKOÇ, M., BURSALI, E. A., SEYHAN, S. B. (2022). Impregnation of different ionic liquids onto cationic starch and their comparisonin the extraction of Th(IV). Turkish Journal of Chemistry, Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 2, 364–372. https://ajindex.com/articles/601994

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (1)

  1. Wang, Y.; Xie, W.Carbohyd. Polym.2010,80, 1172-1177. 2.Wang, P. X; Wu, X. L.; Xue, D. H.; Kun, X.; Ying, T.; Du, X. B.; Li, W. B.Carbohyd. Res.2009,344, 851-855. 3.Wei, Y.; Cheng, F.; Zheng, H.Carbohyd. Polym.2008,74,673-679. 4.Tara, A.; Berzin, F.; Tighzert, L.; Vergnes, B.J. Appl. Polym. Sci.2004,93, 201-208. 5.Baek, K.; Yang, J. S.; Kwon, T. S.; Yang, J. W.Desalination.2007,206, 245-250. 6.Jarnstrom, L.; Lason, L.; Rigdahl, M.Colloid Surface A.1995,104, 191-205. 7.Zhao, F.; Meng, Y.; Anderson, J. L.J. Chromatogr. A.2008,1208, 1-9. 8.Fontanals, N.; Borrull, F.; Marce, R. M.Trac.-Trend. Anal. Chem.2012,41, 15-26. 9.Yao, C.; Anderson, J. L.Anal. Bioanal. Chem.2009,395, 1491-1502. 10.Li, P.; Zhao, Q.; Anderson, J. L.; Varanasi, S.; Coleman, M. R.J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Chem.2010,48, 4036-4046. 11.Mohammadi, S. Z.; Afzali, D.; Fallahi, Z.Int. J. Environ. An. Ch.2014,94, 765-773. 12.Ren, H.; Ying, H.; Sun, Y.; Wu, D.; Ma, Y.; Wei, X.Polym. Bull.2014,71, 1173-1195. 13.Dahi, A.; Fatyeyeva, K.; Langevin, D.; Chappey, C.; Rogalsky, S. P.; Tarasyuk, O. P.; Benamor, A.; Marais, S.J.Membrane Sci.2014,458, 164-178. 14.Zhou, W.; Sun, X.; Gu L.; Bao, F.; Xu, X.; Pang, C.; Gu, Z.; Li, Z.J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem.2014,300, 843-852. 15.Faria, L. F. O.; Penna, T. C.; Ribeiro, M. C. C.J. Phys. Chem. B.2013;117, 10905-10912. 16.Yin, K. K.; Zhang, Z.; Yang, L.; Hirano, S.J. Power Sources2014,258, 150-154. 17.Ayata, S.; Bozkurt, S. S.; Ocakoglu, K.Talanta2011,84, 212-215. 18.Crini, G.Prog. Polym. Sci.2005,30, 38-70. 19.Loveland, W. D.; Morrissey, D. J.; Seaborg, G. T.Modern Nuclear Chemistry; Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley, 2006. 20.Sadeek, A. S.; Moussa, E. M. M.; El-Sayed, M. A.; Amine, M. M.; Abd El-Magied, M. O.J. Dispers. Sci. Technol.2014,35, 926-933. 21.Prasada, R. T.; Metilda, P.; Gladis, J. M.Talanta2006,68, 1047-1064. 22.Bursali, E. A.; Coskun, S.; Kizil, M.; Yurdakoc, M.Carbohydr. Polym.2011,83, 1377-1383. 23.Lu, S. S.; Guo, Z. Q.; Zhang, C. C.; Zhang, S. W.J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem.2011,287, 621-628. 24.Wu, W. S.; Fan, Q. H.; Xu, J. Z.; Niu, Z. W.; Lu, S.Appl. Radiat. Isotopes2007,65, 1108-1114. 25.Chen, C. L.; Wang, X. K.Appl. Geochem.2007,22, 436-445. 26.Chen, C. L.; Wang, X. K.Appl. Radiat. Isotopes2007,65, 155-163. 27.Deng, X. J.; Lu, L. L.; Li, H. W.; Luo, F.J. Hazard. Mater.2010,183, 923-930. 28.Sharma, P.; Tomar, R.Micropor. Mesopor. Mat.2008,116, 641-652. 29.Li, Y.; Wang, C.; Guo, Z.; Liu, C.; Wu, W.J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem.2014,299, 1683-1691. 30.Jeffery, P. G.Ch