Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Chemistry / 2017 / Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 6

Investigation of photoinduced polymerization of doxycycline-imprinted hydrogels: effect of template on initiator reactivity, conversion, and reaction rate

Sayfa
862–873
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The conversion and reaction rate decreased during photopolymerization when the template concentration increased in the monomer mixture.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Photopolymerization kinetics of doxycycline hyclate (DOX)-imprinted hydrogels were monitored by real-time Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and differential photocalorimetry. 2-Hydroxyethyl methacrylate-based hydrogels were synthesized by using ethylene glycol dimethacrylate as a cross-linker, acrylic acid (AA) as a functional monomer, and 2,2-dimethyl-2-hydroxy acetophenone as a photoinitiator.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:For imprinting DOX in hydrogels, the molar ratio of template to functional monomer (DOX:AA) was chosen as 1:8 and 1:16.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The conversion and reaction rate decreased during photopolymerization when the template concentration increased in the monomer mixture.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Photopolymerization kinetics of doxycycline hyclate (DOX)-imprinted hydrogels were monitored by real-time Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and differential photocalorimetry. 2-Hydroxyethyl methacrylate-based hydrogels were synthesized by using ethylene glycol dimethacrylate as a cross-linker, acrylic acid (AA) as a functional monomer, and 2,2-dimethyl-2-hydroxy acetophenone as a photoinitiator. For imprinting DOX in hydrogels, the molar ratio of template to functional monomer (DOX:AA) was chosen as 1:8 and 1:16. The polymerization was achieved at two different initiator concentrations. The conversion and reaction rate were calculated as a function of the molar ratio of template, and the results were compared to those of nonimprinted ones. In order to reveal the effect of DOX on the photoinduced radical polymerization, thermal polymerization was also performed for imprinted and nonimprinted hydrogels by using 2,2 ′ - azobis(2,4-dimethyl-pentanenitrile) as a thermal initiator. All results showed that there is a signi cant effect of DOX concentration on the conversion and reaction rate of the photopolymerization reaction. The conversion and reaction rate decreased during photopolymerization when the template concentration increased in the monomer mixture.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

GÜNER, F. S., DALGAKIRAN, D., INAN, T. (2022). Investigation of photoinduced polymerization of doxycycline-imprinted hydrogels: effect of template on initiator reactivity, conversion, and reaction rate. Turkish Journal of Chemistry, Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 6, 862–873. https://ajindex.com/articles/601861

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (28)

  1. Byrne, M. E.; Salian, V. Int. J. Pharm. 2008, 364, 188-212
  2. Tieppo, A.; White, C. J.; Paine, A. C.; Voyles, M. L.; McBride, M. K.; Byrne, M. E. J. Control. Release 2012, 157, 391-397
  3. Vasapollo, G.; Del Sole, R.; Mergola, L.; Lazzoi, M. R.; Scardino, A.; Scorrano, S.; Mele, G. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2011, 12, 5908-5945
  4. Yu, Q.; Deng, S.; Yu, G. Water Res. 2008, 42, 3089-3097
  5. Andersson, L. I. J. Chromatogr. B Biomed. Sci. Appl. 2000, 739, 163-173
  6. Kriz, D.; Ramstrom, O.; Mosbach, K. Anal. Chem. 1997, 69, 345A-349A
  7. Yan, H.; Row, K. H. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2006, 7, 155-178
  8. Karim, K.; Breton, F.; Rouillon, R.; Piletska, E. V.; Guerreiro, A.; Chianella, I.; Piletsky, S. A. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2005, 57, 1795-1808
  9. Spivak, D. A. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2005, 57, 1779-1794
  10. Wei, S.; Mizaikoff, B. J. Sep. Sci. 2007, 30, 1794-1805
  11. Martin-Esteban, A. Fresenius J. Anal. Chem. 2001, 370, 795-802
  12. Cormack, P. A. G.; Elorza, A. Z. J. Chromatogr. B 2004, 804, 173-182
  13. Sellergren, B.; Shea, K. J. J. Chromatogr. A 1993, 635, 31-49
  14. Sellergren, B.; Dauwe, C.; Schneider, T. Macromolecules 1997, 30, 2454-2459
  15. Andersson, L. I.; Muller, R.; Vlatakist, V.; Mosbach, K. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1995, 92, 4788-4792
  16. Oral, E.; Peppas, N. A. Polymer 2004, 45, 6163-6173
  17. Venkatesh, S.; Sizemore, S. P.; Byrne, M. E. Biomaterials 2007, 28, 717-724
  18. Hiratani, H.; Alvarez-Lorenzo, C. Biomaterials 2004, 25, 1105-1113
  19. Hiratani, H.; Alvarez-Lorenzo, C. Langmuir 2002, 83, 223-230
  20. White, C. J.; McBride, M. K.; Pate, K. M.; Tieppo, A.; Byrne, M. E. Biomaterials 2011, 32, 5698-5705
  21. Leach, J. H. MSc, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, USA, 2003
  22. Schneider, L. F. J.; Pfeifer, C. S. C.; Consani, S.; Prahl, S. A.; Ferracane, J. L. Dent. Mater. 2008, 24, 1169-1177
  23. Jakubiak, J.; Sionkowska, A.; Linden, L. A.; Rabek, J. F. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2001, 65, 435-443
  24. Fouassier, J. P.; Allonas, X.; Burget, D. Prog. Org. Coatings 2003, 47, 16-36
  25. Stansbury, J. W. J. Esthet. Dent. 2000, 12, 300-308
  26. Van Boeckel, T. P.; Gandra, S.; Ashok, A.; Caudron, Q.; Grenfell, B. T.; Levin, S. A.; Laxminarayan, R. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2014, 14, 742-750
  27. Jing, T.; Gao, X. D.; Wang, P.; Wang, Y.; Lin, Y. F.; Zong, X. C.; Zhou, Y. K.; Mei, S. R. Chinese Chem. Lett. 2007, 18, 1535-1538
  28. Yang, C.; Zhang, Z.; Chen, S.; Yang, F. Microchim