Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry / 2015 / Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 2

Effcacy of the entomopathogenic nematode Heterorhabditis bacteriophora using diferent application methods in the presence or absence of a natural enemy

Sayfa
277–285
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Our results indicate that the diferent application methods had nosignifcant effect on larval mortality, but the presence of mites had a negative effect on the cadaver application when the cadavers were3 days old but had no signifcant efect when the cadavers were 6 and 9 days old.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Various application methods for the entomopathogenic nematode Heterorhabditis bacteriophora were evaluated underlaboratory and feld conditions.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Four diferent methods of applying the infective juveniles (IJs) of the nematode to soil were assessedincluding (1) insect cadavers (referred to as nematode-infected cadavers), (2) subsurface injection, (3) spraying, and (4) drip irrigation.In the laboratory experiment, except for the control with no nematodes, all treatments showed more than 95% insect mortality ofthe bait insect (Galleria mellonella ) with no signifcant diferences among treatments.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Our results indicate that the diferent application methods had nosignifcant effect on larval mortality, but the presence of mites had a negative effect on the cadaver application when the cadavers were3 days old but had no signifcant efect when the cadavers were 6 and 9 days old.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Various application methods for the entomopathogenic nematode Heterorhabditis bacteriophora were evaluated underlaboratory and feld conditions. Four diferent methods of applying the infective juveniles (IJs) of the nematode to soil were assessedincluding (1) insect cadavers (referred to as nematode-infected cadavers), (2) subsurface injection, (3) spraying, and (4) drip irrigation.In the laboratory experiment, except for the control with no nematodes, all treatments showed more than 95% insect mortality ofthe bait insect (Galleria mellonella ) with no signifcant diferences among treatments. Te same experimental setup was conductedwith the introduction of mites, Sancassania polyphyllae (Acari: Acaridae), which are natural enemies of entomopathogenic nematodes.Te treatment groups with mites and the control group without mites showed more than 87% insect mortality and no signifcantdiferences were observed. Te nematode-infected cadaver application method was further evaluated by using cadavers of diferent agescontaining H. bacteriophora IJs in the presence of mites. Larval mortality of the bait insect was signifcantly lower when 3- or 6-day- old nematode-insect cadavers were used in the presence of mites. Diferent application methods were also tested in a corn feld. Nosignifcant diferences were observed among the application methods. Our results indicate that the diferent application methods had nosignifcant effect on larval mortality, but the presence of mites had a negative effect on the cadaver application when the cadavers were3 days old but had no signifcant efect when the cadavers were 6 and 9 days old.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KARAGÖZ, M., HAZIR, C., HAZIR, S., ASAN, C., RAJA, R. K., GÜMÜŞ, A. (2022). Effcacy of the entomopathogenic nematode Heterorhabditis bacteriophora using diferent application methods in the presence or absence of a natural enemy. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 2, 277–285. https://ajindex.com/articles/599453

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (1)

  1. Abbott WS (1925). A method for computing the efectiveness of an insecticide. J Econ Entomol 18: 265–267. Alves SB (1986). Controle Microbiano de Insetos. São Paulo, Brazil: Manole (in Portuguese). Bruck DJ, Shapiro-Ilan DI, Lewis EE (2005). Evaluation of application technologies of entomopathogenic nematodes for control of the black vine weevil. J Econ Entomol 98: 1884–1889. Brusselman E, Beck B, Pollet S, Temmerman F, Spanoghe P, Moensa M, Nuyttens D (2012). Efect of the spray application technique on the deposition of entomopathogenic nematodes in vegetables. Pest Manag Sci 68: 444–453. Bullock RC, Pelosi RR, Killer EE (1999). Management of citrus root weevils (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) on Florida citrus with soil- applied entomopathogenic nematodes (Nematoda: Rhabditida). Fla Entomol 82: 1–7. Cabanillas HE, Raulston JR (1996). Efects of furrow irrigation on the distribution and infectivity of Steinernema riobravis against corn earworm in corn. Fund Appl Nematol 19: 273–281. Cakmak I, Ekmen ZI, Karagoz M, Hazir S, Kaya HK (2010). Development and reproduction of Sancassania polyphyllae (Acari: Acaridae) feeding on entomopathogenic nematodes and tissues of insect larvae. Pedobiologia 53: 235–240. Cakmak I, Hazir S, Ulug D, Karagoz M (2013). Olfactory response of Sancassania polyphyllae (Acari: Acaridae) to its phoretic host larva killed by the entomopathogenic nematode, Steinernema glaseri (Rhabditida: Steinernematidae). Biol Control 65: 212–217. Cakmak I, Karagoz M, Ekmen ZI, Hazir S, Kaya HK (2011). Life history of Sancassania polyphyllae (Acari: Acaridae) feeding on dissected tissues of its phoretic host, Polyphylla fullo (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae): temperature efects. Exp App Acarol 53: 41–49. Conner JM, McSorley R, Stansly PA, Pitts DJ (1998). Delivery of Steinernema riobravis through a drip irrigation system. Nematropica 28: 95–100. Curran J (1992). Infuence of application method and pest population size on the feld efcacy of entomopathogenic nematodes. J Nematol 24: 631–636. Del Valle EE, Dolinski C, Barreto ELS, Souza RM, Samuels RI (2008). Efcacy of Heterorhabditis baujardi LPP7 (Nematoda: Rhabditida) applied in Galleria mellonella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) insect cadavers to Conotrachelus psidii, (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) larvae. Biocontrol Sci Techn 18: 33–41. Dillman AR, Chaston JM, Adams BJ, Ciche TA, Goodrich-Blair H, Stock SP, Sternberg PW (2012). An entomopathogenic nematode by any other name. PLoS Pathogens 8(3): e1002527. doi:10.1371/jo