Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry / 2022 / Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 2

Multidimensional scaling analysis of sensory characteristics and quantitative traits in wild apricots

Sayfa
160–172
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The wild apricot individuals with interesting features could be used as a parent in apricot breeding programs for the development of commercial cultivars.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The Cappadocia Region in Central Anatolia, Turkey is rich in wild apricot genetic resources.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In this study, a multivariate analysis method of metric and nonmetric multidimensional scaling analysis (MDS) was used to classify 43 wild apricot genotypes and 5 standard cultivars by using Euclidean distance.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The wild apricot individuals with interesting features could be used as a parent in apricot breeding programs for the development of commercial cultivars.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

The Cappadocia Region in Central Anatolia, Turkey is rich in wild apricot genetic resources. In this study, a multivariate analysis method of metric and nonmetric multidimensional scaling analysis (MDS) was used to classify 43 wild apricot genotypes and 5 standard cultivars by using Euclidean distance. MDS was applied, based on dissimilarities, to quantitative traits of weight, height, width and thickness of fruit, stone and kernel weight, flesh/stone ratio, total soluble solids content, titratable acidity and pH in fruit juice, and sensory attributes of fruit size and shape, cavity depth, suture (cheek line), fruit apex, fruit attractiveness, skin pubescence, ground and over color (blush), eating quality, aroma, firmness and juiciness of flesh, uniformity of ripening of fruit, flesh color and texture, skin cracking and pit burn susceptibility, separation of stone, stone size and shape (lateral view), stone surface and kernel taste. The results showed that most of the wild apricots (91.66%) had small sized fruits ranging from 10.5 g (type #53) to 79.3 g (type #68) with an average of 25.27 ± 2.44 g. The genotypes had fair or good eating quality and aroma, good fruit attractiveness and light bitter or sweet kernel taste in general. The harvest date showed quite a wide range between late June and early September among the genotypes. The sufficient number of dimensions was determined by stress value and pseudo-R2 statistics, then relative positions of genotypes were displayed on graphics. The Aprikoz was the most distinct cultivated apricot from the wild genotypes. Both MDS analyses revealed that most of the wild genotypes had similar fruit characteristics while genotypes of #13, #20, #39, #60, #64, #68 differed the most. The wild apricot individuals with interesting features could be used as a parent in apricot breeding programs for the development of commercial cultivars.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

DOST, S. E., DELİALİOĞLU, R. A., KESİK, A., KOCABAŞ, Z., DUMANOĞLU, H., ERDOĞAN, V. (2022). Multidimensional scaling analysis of sensory characteristics and quantitative traits in wild apricots. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 2, 160–172. https://ajindex.com/articles/599066

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (8)

  1. Abbott JA (1999). Quality measurement of fruits and vegetables. Postharvest Biology and Technology 15: 207-225. doi: 10.1016/ S0925-5214(98)00086-6
  2. Akça Y, Asma BM (1999). A study on the selection of new dried apricot types. Gazi Osmanpaşa Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 16 (1): 1-7. (in Turkish with an abstract in English). Akça Y, Sen SM (1999). Studies on the apricot with good fruit quality and resistance to late spring frosts in Gevaş Plain. Acta Horticulturae 488: 135-137. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.1999.488.16 Akçalı E, Uzun A (2016). Some phenological and pomological characteristics of almond (Prunus amygdalus L.) selected types from the foothills of Erciyes mountain. Akademik Ziraat Dergisi 5 (2): 63-68. (in Turkish with an abstract in English). Alpar R (2013). Uygulamalı Çok Değişkenli İstatistiksel Yöntemler. 4. Baskı. Ankara:
  3. Detay Yayınevi.
  4. Asma BM, Kan T, Birhanlı O (2007). Characterization of promising apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) genetic resources in Malatya, Turkey. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 54: 205-212. doi: 10.1007/s10722-005-3809-9
  5. Asma BM, Ozturk K (2005). Analysis of morphological, pomological and yield characteristics of some apricot germplasm in Turkey. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 52: 305-313. doi: 10.1007/s10722-003-1384-5
  6. Bakır M, Dumanoglu H, Erdogan V, Ernim C, Macit T (2019). Characterization of wild apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) genotypes selected from Cappadocia region (Nevşehir-Turkey) by SSR markers. Journal of Agricultural Sciences 25: 498-507. doi: 10.15832/ankutbd.457850 Balta F, Kaya T, Yarılgaç T, Kazankaya A, Balta MF et al. (2002). Promising apricot genetic resources from the Lake Van Region. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 49: 409-413. doi: 10.1023/A:1020682116689 Başpınar E, Mendes M, Çamdeviren H (2000). Çok boyutlu ölçeklendirme analizi ve kullanımı. Biyoteknoloji (Kükem) Dergisi 24 (1): 89-98.
  7. Bolat S (1999). Research on selection of apricots which resistance to late spring frost and good quality in Konya. Selçuk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 13 (18): 25-32. (in Turkish with an abstract in English). Borg I, Groenen PJF, Mair P (2013). Applied Multidimensional Scaling. Springer Briefs in Statistics. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-31848-1
  8. Bostan SZ, Sen SM, Askın MA (1995). Researches on breeding by selection of wild apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) forms on Darende plain. Acta Horticulturae 384: 205-208. doi: 10.17660/ ActaHortic.1995.384.30 Bülbül S, K