Dergiler / Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 4

Antioxidant Activity and Total Phenolics of Local Apple Cultivars Encountered along the Coastal Zone of Northeastern Anatolia Region of Turkey

Sayfa
471–478
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

However, the local apple cultivar of ‘HemşinElması’ had greater values of both parameters in fruit flesh than infruit flesh + skin tissue.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In this study, antioxidant activity and total phenolics in fruit fleshand fruit flesh + skin tissue of local apple cultivars encounteredalong the coastal zone of Northeastern Anatolia Region (Turkey)and 5 standard cultivars were determined.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In local cultivars,antioxidant activities (µmol Trolox equivalent (TE) antioxidant gfresh weight (fw)-1) varied between 0.17-1.70 in fruit flesh andbetween 0.35-1.55 in fruit flesh + skin tissue; in standard cultivars,the values varied between 0.24 (‘Royal Gala’) and 0.29 (‘GrannySmith’ and ‘Pink Lady’) in fruit flesh and between 0.27 (‘Jonagold’)and 0.61 (‘Royal Gala’) in fruit flesh + skin tissue.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:However, the local apple cultivar of ‘HemşinElması’ had greater values of both parameters in fruit flesh than infruit flesh + skin tissue.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

In this study, antioxidant activity and total phenolics in fruit fleshand fruit flesh + skin tissue of local apple cultivars encounteredalong the coastal zone of Northeastern Anatolia Region (Turkey)and 5 standard cultivars were determined. In local cultivars,antioxidant activities (µmol Trolox equivalent (TE) antioxidant gfresh weight (fw)-1) varied between 0.17-1.70 in fruit flesh andbetween 0.35-1.55 in fruit flesh + skin tissue; in standard cultivars,the values varied between 0.24 (‘Royal Gala’) and 0.29 (‘GrannySmith’ and ‘Pink Lady’) in fruit flesh and between 0.27 (‘Jonagold’)and 0.61 (‘Royal Gala’) in fruit flesh + skin tissue. In local cultivars,total phenolics (Gallic acid equivalent (GAE) kg fw-1) variedbetween 53.26- 00.54 in fruit flesh and between 89.32-406.91 infruit flesh + skin tissue; the values in standard cultivars variedbetween 56.30 (‘Royal Gala’) and 124.64 (‘Jonagold’) in fruit fleshand between 102.73 (‘Summerred’) and 198.72 (‘Jonagold’) in fruitflesh + skin tissue. Present findings revealed that local cultivarsgenerally had 3-4 times greater antioxidant activity and totalphenolics than the standard cultivars. Fruit flesh + skin tissuegenerally had greater antioxidant activity and total phenolics thanthe fruit flesh alone. However, the local apple cultivar of ‘HemşinElması’ had greater values of both parameters in fruit flesh than infruit flesh + skin tissue.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

DOST, S. E., DUMANOĞLU, H., AYGÜN, A. (2022). Antioxidant Activity and Total Phenolics of Local Apple Cultivars Encountered along the Coastal Zone of Northeastern Anatolia Region of Turkey. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 4, 471–478. https://ajindex.com/articles/594784

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Albayrak S, Sağdıç O & Aksoy A (2010). The assays used for assessing antioxidant capacities of herbal products and foods. Erciyes University Journal of Institute of Science and Technology 26(4): 401-409
  2. Balasundram N, Sundram K & Samman S (2006). Phenolic compounds in plants and agri-industrial by-products: Antioxidant activity, occurrence, and potential uses. Food Chemistry 99: 191-203
  3. Bohm V, Kschonsek J, Wolfram T & Stöckl A (2018). Polyphenolic compounds analysis of old and new apple cultivars and contribution of polyphenolic profile to the in vitro antioxidant capacity. Antioxidants (Basel) 7(1): 1-14
  4. Drogoudi P D, Michailidis Z & Pantelidis G (2008). Peel and flesh antioxidant content and harvest quality characteristics of seven apple cultivars. Scientia Horticulturae 115: 149-153
  5. Garcia O B, Castillo J, Marin F R, Ortuno A & Del Rio J A (1997). Uses and properties of Citrus flavonoids. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 45: 4505-4515 Imeh U & Khokhar S (2002). Distribution of conjugated and free phenols in fruits: antioxidant activity and cultivar variations. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 50(22): 6301-6306
  6. Kevers C, Pincemail J, Tabart J, Defraigne J O & Dommes J (2011). Influence of cultivar, harvest time, storageconditions, andpeeling on the antioxidant capacity and phenolic and ascorbic acid contents of apples and pears. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 59: 6165-6171
  7. Khanizadech S, Tsao R, Rekika D, Yang R, Charles M T & Rupasinghe H P V (2008). Polyphenol composition and total antioxidant capacity of selected apple genotypes for processing. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 21: 396-401
  8. Lachman J, Sulc M, Sus J & Pavlikova O (2006). Polyphenol content and antiradical activity in different apple varieties. Horticultural Science (Prague) 33(3): 95-102
  9. Lee K W, Kim Y J, Kim D, Lee H J & Lee C Y (2003). Major phenolics in apple and their contribution to the total antioxidant capacity. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 51: 6516-6520
  10. Manach C, Mazur A & Scalbert A (2005). Polyphenols and prevention of cardiovascular diseases. Current Opinions in Lipidology 16: 77-84
  11. Margaret E, Shailaja A M & Rao V V (2015). Evaluation of antioxidant activity in different parts of Syzygium cumini (Linn.). International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 4(9): 372-379
  12. Markowski J, Plocharski W & Mieszczakowska M (2007). Effect of cultivar and processing on phenolics and antioxidant activity of apple produc