Dergiler / Journal of the Turkish-German Gynecological Association / 2020 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 3

A comparison of the risk of cesarean section in gestational diabetes mellitus patients supplemented antenatally with vitamin D containing supplements versus placebo: A systematic review and meta-analysis of double-blinded randomized controlled trials

Sayfa
201–212
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The antenataluse of vitamin D containing supplements in non-insulin treated GDM patients might reduce the risk of CS and macrosomia. (J Turk Ger GynecolAssoc 2020; 21: 201-12)

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The aim of this study was to study the role of vitamin D containing supplements in the risk of cesarean section (CS), a common complicationin gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) patients.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:This review included five Iranian trials sourcing data from nearly 380 participants.The risk of bias in the trials was primarily low.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The antenataluse of vitamin D containing supplements in non-insulin treated GDM patients might reduce the risk of CS and macrosomia. (J Turk Ger GynecolAssoc 2020; 21: 201-12)
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:2020 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

The aim of this study was to study the role of vitamin D containing supplements in the risk of cesarean section (CS), a common complicationin gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) patients. An additional objective was to assess the risk of developing pre-eclampsia, preterm delivery,macrosomia, and polyhydramnios in these participants. Various electronic databases were searched for double-blinded parallel-arm randomizedcontrolled trials that reported the incidence of CS in adult, non-insulin treated GDM patients who received vitamin D and placebo in differenttreatment arms, respectively. Next, each eligible trial’s risk of bias was assessed, and the effects of the above interventions on the respectiveoutcomes were compared meta-analytically across the trials. This review included five Iranian trials sourcing data from nearly 380 participants.The risk of bias in the trials was primarily low. In contrast to the placebo group, the risk of CS [risk ratio (RR): 0.61, p=0.002, 95% confidenceinterval (CI): 0.44,0.83; I2=0%, p-value of Cochrane’s Q: 0.373) and macrosomia (RR: 0.31, p=0.006, 95% CI: 0.13,0.72; I2=0%, p-value of Cochrane’sQ: 0.935] was less in the vitamin D supplemented group. The remaining outcomes did not differ between the intervention groups. The antenataluse of vitamin D containing supplements in non-insulin treated GDM patients might reduce the risk of CS and macrosomia. (J Turk Ger GynecolAssoc 2020; 21: 201-12)

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

SAHA, S., SAHA, S. (2022). A comparison of the risk of cesarean section in gestational diabetes mellitus patients supplemented antenatally with vitamin D containing supplements versus placebo: A systematic review and meta-analysis of double-blinded randomized controlled trials. Journal of the Turkish-German Gynecological Association, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 3, 201–212. https://ajindex.com/articles/567410

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. Quintanilla Rodriguez BS, Mahdy H. Gestational Diabetes. StatPearls. 2019
  2. Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 190: Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. Obstet Gynecol 2018; 131: 49-64
  3. Mosley JF 2nd, Smith L, Everton E, Fellner C. Sodium-Glucose Linked Transporter 2 (SGLT2) Inhibitors in the Management Of Type-2 Diabetes: A Drug Class Overview. P T 2015; 40: 451-62
  4. Saha S. An Appraisal of a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials on the Efficacy and Safety of Sodium- Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors as an Adjunct to Insulin Therapy in Type 1 Diabetes Patients. Int J Diabetes Metab 2019: 1-1
  5. Saha S, Saha S. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials, Contrasting the Safety Profile between Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors and Placebo in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Patients. Int J Diabetes Metab. 2020: 1-12 6. Saha S. Compliance and barriers to self-monitoring of blood glucose in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus: A systematic review. Int J Health Sci (Qassim). 2019; 13: 44-52
  6. Coustan DR. Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. Clin Chem 2013; 59: 1310-21
  7. Alfadhli E. Gestational diabetes mellitus. Saudi Med J 2015; 36: 399- 406
  8. Sung S, Mahdy H. Cesarean Section. StatPearls. 2019
  9. Boriboonhirunsarn D, Waiyanikorn R. Emergency cesarean section rate between women with gestational diabetes and normal pregnant women. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2016; 55: 64-7
  10. Prakash GT, Das AK, Habeebullah S, Bhat V, Shamanna SB. Maternal and Neonatal Outcome in Mothers with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. Indian J Endocrinol Metab 2017; 21: 854-8
  11. Lapolla A, Dalfrà MG, Bonomo M, Parretti E, Mannino D, Mello G, et al. Gestational diabetes mellitus in Italy: a multicenter study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009; 145: 149-53
  12. Keshavarz M, Cheung NW, Babaee GR, Moghadam HK, Ajami ME, Shariati M. Gestational diabetes in Iran: incidence, risk factors and pregnancy outcomes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2005; 69: 279-86
  13. Ovesen PG, Jensen DM, Damm P, Rasmussen S, Kesmodel US. Maternal and neonatal outcomes in pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes. a nation-wide study. J Matern Neonatal Med 2015; 28: 1720-4
  14. Erem C, Kuzu UB, Deger O, Can G. Prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus and associated risk factors in Turkish women: the Trabzon GDM Study. Arch Med Sci 2015; 11: 724-35
  15. Gascho CL, Leandro DM, Ribeiro E Silva T, Silva JC.