KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Journal of the Turkish-German Gynecological Association / 2020 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 3

Expulsion rate of intrauterine device: mediate vs. immediate puerperium period

Juliano Terra HOCHMULLER
Karina Souza LOPES
Cristina Aparecida Falbo GUAZZELLİ
Mariana Kefalas Oliveira GOMES
Edward Araujo JUNİOR
Alberto Borges PEİXOTO
Sayfa
143–149
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The type of delivery was a significant predictor forIUD expulsion (p

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: To evaluate the rate of expulsion of intrauterine device (IUD) inserted during the immediate and mediate puerperium.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Patients whose IUD (TCU-380 copper) was placed during the puerperalperiod were divided in two groups according to the time of placement: immediate and mediate puerperium.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The type of delivery was a significant predictor forIUD expulsion (p
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the rate of expulsion of intrauterine device (IUD) inserted during the immediate and mediate puerperium. To evaluatewhether the type of delivery is a predictor of expulsion of the IUD when inserted in the puerperium period.Material and Methods: This was a prospective observational study. Patients whose IUD (TCU-380 copper) was placed during the puerperalperiod were divided in two groups according to the time of placement: immediate and mediate puerperium. The decision regarding the time ofIUD insertion was made in a non-randomized manner. Analysis was performed using chi-square, Mann-Whitney U, and Spearman’s correlationtests and logistic regression analysis.Results: The total rate of IUD expulsions was 28.8% (49/170). There was no significant association between the occurrence of expulsion and thetiming of IUD insertion (immediate vs mediate puerperium; 26.6% vs 34.78%, p=0.296). Among patients experiencing expulsion, 79.6% (39/49)underwent insertion after vaginal delivery and 20.4% (10/49) during cesarean section (CS). The type of delivery was a significant predictor forIUD expulsion (p

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

HOCHMULLER, J. T., LOPES, K. S., GUAZZELLİ, C. A. F., GOMES, M. K. O., JUNİOR, E. A., PEİXOTO, A. B. (2022). Expulsion rate of intrauterine device: mediate vs. immediate puerperium period. Journal of the Turkish-German Gynecological Association, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 3, 143–149. https://ajindex.com/articles/652605

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Shaw E, Levitt C, Wong S, Kaczorowski J; The McMaster University Postpartum Research Group. Systematic review of the literature on postpartum care: effectiveness of postpartum support to improve maternal parenting, mental health, quality of life, and physical health. Birth 2006; 33: 210-20
  2. American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Guidelines for perinatal care. 8th ed. Elk Grove Village (IL): AAP; Washington, DC: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; 2017
  3. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Gynecologic Practice; Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptive Expert Work Group. Committee Opinion No 672: Clinical Challenges of Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptive Methods. Obstet Gynecol 2016; 128: 69-77
  4. Lopez LM, Bernholc A, Hubacher D, Stuart G, Van Vliet HA. Immediate postpartum insertion of intrauterine device for contraception. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015: CD003036
  5. Gurney EP, Sonalkar S, McAllister A, Sammel MD, Schreiber CA. Six-month expulsion of postplacental copper intrauterine devices placed after vaginal delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018; 219: 183
  6. Committee on Practice Bulletins-Gynecology, Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Work Group. Practice Bulletin No. 186: Long-Acting Reversible Contraception: Implants and Intrauterine Devices. Obstet Gynecol 2017; 130: 251-69
  7. Gurtcheff SE, Turok DK, Stoddard G, Murphy PA, Gibson M, Jones KP. Lactogenesis after early postpartum use of the contraceptive implant: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 117: 1114-21
  8. Simmons KB, Edelman AB, Li H, Yanit KE, Jensen JT. Personalized contraceptive assistance and uptake of long-acting, reversible contraceptives by postpartum women: a randomized, controlled trial. Contraception 2013; 88: 45-51
  9. Thiery M, Laufe L, Parewijck W, van der Pas H, van Kets H, Derom R, et al. Immediate postplacental IUD insertion: a randomized trial of sutured (Lippes Loop and TCu22OC) and non-sutured (TCu22OC) models. Contraception 1983; 28: 299-313
  10. Kisnisci H, Champion CB. A study of delta intrauterine devices in Ankara, Turkey. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1985; 23: 51-4
  11. Soydinc HE, Evsen MS, Caça F, Sak ME, Taner MZ, Sak S. Translocated intrauterine contraceptive device: experiences of two medical centers with risk factors and the need for surgical treatment. J Reprod Med 2013; 58: 234-40
  12. Agacayak E, Tunc SY, Icen MS, Oguz A, Ozler A, Turgut A, et al.