KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / İş Ahlakı Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 1

Finding a New Prince for Management Science: The Antithesis to the Machiavellian Prince

Khurram Ellahi KHAN
Omar Khalid BHATTİ
Sayfa
27–38
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The study also analyzes how two different princes (i.e.,Prince Myshkin and Machiavelli’s prince) guidemanagers under similar situations, thus guiding managers to deal in contemporary tones with the way of the newprince (i.e., Prince Myshkin).

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Machiavelli’s The Prince has been cherished for more than 500 years, withits various facets used by scholarsand researchers of management sciences.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:But with the dawn of positive organizational scholarship, the Machiavellianprince with his dark aspects does not appear compatible.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The study also analyzes how two different princes (i.e.,Prince Myshkin and Machiavelli’s prince) guidemanagers under similar situations, thus guiding managers to deal in contemporary tones with the way of the newprince (i.e., Prince Myshkin).
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Machiavelli’s The Prince has been cherished for more than 500 years, withits various facets used by scholarsand researchers of management sciences. But with the dawn of positive organizational scholarship, the Machiavellianprince with his dark aspects does not appear compatible. Hence, the emerging field, resting more on humans’positive side, is also in need of an idol the way Machiavelli’s The Prince has been idolized through the traditionalviews of management and business. As a result, the current study has reviewed Prince Myshkin, the protagonist inDostoevsky’s The Idiot as the alternative and antagonist to Machiavelli’s style. Hence the current study identifies thepossible ethical implications in human resource management which can be guided through the character of PrinceMyshkin. The study also analyzes how two different princes (i.e.,Prince Myshkin and Machiavelli’s prince) guidemanagers under similar situations, thus guiding managers to deal in contemporary tones with the way of the newprince (i.e., Prince Myshkin).

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KHAN, K. E., BHATTİ, O. K. (2022). Finding a New Prince for Management Science: The Antithesis to the Machiavellian Prince. İş Ahlakı Dergisi, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 1, 27–38. https://ajindex.com/articles/555912

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Anderson, K. T., & Holloway, J. (2018, December). Discourse analysis as theory, method, and epistemology in studies of education policy. Journal of Education Policy, 1–34.
  2. Avolio, B.J., Zhu, W., Koh, W., & Bhatia, P. (2004). Transformational leadership and organizational commitment: Mediating role of psychological empowerment and moderating role of structural distance. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 25(8), 951–969.
  3. Baddeley, S., & James, K. (1987). Owl, fox, donkey or sheep: Political skills for managers. Management Learning,18(1),3–19
  4. Becket, L. (2006). In the light of Christ: Writings in the Western tradition. San Francisco, CA: Ignatius Press.
  5. Belschak, F. D., Den Hartog, D. N., & De Hoogh, A. H. (2018). Angels and demons: The effect of ethical leadership on Machiavellian employees’ work behaviors. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1082. Belschak, F. D., Muhammad, R. S., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2018). Birds of a feather can butt heads: When Machiavellian employees work with Machiavellian leaders. Journal of Business Ethics, 151(3), 613–626.
  6. Bogdashina, O. (2013). Autism and spirituality: Psyche, self and spirit in people on the autism spectrum. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
  7. Bragues, G. (2009). Adam Smith’s vision of the ethical manager. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(4), 447–460.
  8. Cameron, K. S., Dutton, J. E., & Quinn, R. E. (2003). An introduction to positive organizational scholarship. In Positive Organizational Scholarship, pp. 3–13.
  9. Cordeiro, W. P. (2003). The only solution to the decline in business ethics: Ethical managers. Teaching Business Ethics, 7(3), 265–277.
  10. Coulthard, M. (2014). An introduction to discourse analysis. Routledge. Dahling, J. J., Whitaker, B. G., & Levy, P. E. (2009). The development and validation of a new Machiavellianism scale. Journal of Management, 35(2), 219–257.
  11. Den Hartog, D. N., & Belschak, F. D. (2012). Work engagement and Machiavellianism in the ethical leadership process. Journal of Business Ethics, 107(1), 35–47. e Cunha, M. P., Clegg, S., & Rego, A. (2013). Lessons for leaders: Positive organization studies meets Niccolò Machiavelli. Leadership, 9(4), 450–465.
  12. Fry, L. W. (2003). Toward a theory of spiritual leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(6), 693–727.
  13. Gottschall, J. (2012). The storytelling animal: How stories make us human. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. Grant, R. W. (1997). Hypocrisy and integrity: Machiavelli, Rousseau, and the ethics of politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  14. Greenleaf, R. K. (20