Male patients showed higher prevalence (15.71%) thanthe female patients (12%).Conclusions: BMC was observed in 27.71% of examined Turkishsubjects and detected more frequently in males and on the right side.
📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale
🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Aim: The aim of the study was to examine the prevalence of bifidmandibular canals (BMC) in a Turkish population, using cone-beamcomputed tomography (CBCT).Methodology: The CBCT images of 350 untreated patients (178male, 172 female ranging in age between 18 and 65,) were includedin this study.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Forstatistical evaluation, a chi‑square test was used to determine anydifferences in the prevalence of BMC with significance set at 5%.Results: BMCs were observed in 129 out of 700 sides (18.42%) and 97out of 350 patients (27.71%), of which, 55 were in males and 42 infemales.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Male patients showed higher prevalence (15.71%) thanthe female patients (12%).Conclusions: BMC was observed in 27.71% of examined Turkishsubjects and detected more frequently in males and on the right side.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri
Abstract
Aim: The aim of the study was to examine the prevalence of bifidmandibular canals (BMC) in a Turkish population, using cone-beamcomputed tomography (CBCT).Methodology: The CBCT images of 350 untreated patients (178male, 172 female ranging in age between 18 and 65,) were includedin this study. The presence or absence of BMC was determined in axial,sagittal, and coronal planes by considering gender and side. Forstatistical evaluation, a chi‑square test was used to determine anydifferences in the prevalence of BMC with significance set at 5%.Results: BMCs were observed in 129 out of 700 sides (18.42%) and 97out of 350 patients (27.71%), of which, 55 were in males and 42 infemales. Regardless of gender, the right side was more frequentlyaffected (73%). Male patients showed higher prevalence (15.71%) thanthe female patients (12%).Conclusions: BMC was observed in 27.71% of examined Turkishsubjects and detected more frequently in males and on the right side.
🔖
Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap
LAÇİN, N., AYTUĞAR, E., VELİ, İ. (2022). Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of bifid mandibular canal in a Turkish population. International Dental Research, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2, 78–83. https://ajindex.com/articles/539544
Orhan K, Aksoy S, Bilecenoglu B, Sakul BU, Paksoy CS. Evaluation of bifid mandibular canals with cone-beam computed tomography in a Turkish adult population: a retrospective study. Surg Radiol Anat 2011;33:501-7. (Crossref) 2. de Oliveira-Santos C, Souza PH, de Azambuja Berti-Couto S, et al. Assessment of variations of the mandibular canal through cone beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Investig 2012;16:387-93. (Crossref
Naitoh M, Hiraiwa Y, Aimiya H, et al. Observation of bifid mandibular canal using cone-beam computerized tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24:155-9
Ghaeminia H, Meijer GJ, Soehardi A, et al. Position of the impacted third molar in relation to the mandibular canal. Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography compared with panoramic radiography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;38:964-71. (Crossref
Worthington P. Injury to the inferior alveolar nerve during implant placement: a formula for protection of the patient and clinician. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:731-4
Mizbah K, Gerlach N, Maal TJ, et al. The clinical relevance of bifid and trifid mandibular canals. Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012;16:147-51. (Crossref
Bilecenoglu B, Tuncer N. Clinical and anatomical study of retromolar foramen and canal. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006;64:1493-7. (Crossref
Cangul S, Adiguzel O. Cone-Beam Three-Dimensional Dental Volumetric Tomography in Dental Practice. Int Dent Res 2017;7:62-70. (Crossref
Aktuna Belgin C, Adiguzel O, Bud M, Colak M, Akkus Z. Mandibular Buccal Bone Thickness In Southeastern Anatolian People: A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Study. Int Dent Res 2017;7:6-12. (Crossref
Kang JH, Lee KS, Oh MG, et al. The incidence and configuration of the bifid mandibular canal in Koreans by using cone-beam computed tomography. Imaging Sci Dent. 2014;44:53-60. (Crossref
Das S, Suri RK. An anatomic-radiological study of an accessory mandibular foramen on the medial mandibular surface. Folia Morphol 2004;63:511-3
Villaça-Carvalho MF, Manhães LR Jr, de Moraes ME, et al. Prevalence of bifid mandibular canals by cone beam computed tomography. Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016;20:289-94. (Crossref
Kuribayashi A, Watanabe H, Imaizumi A, et al. Bifid mandibular canals: cone beam computed tomography evaluation. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2010;39:235-9. (Crossref
Langlais RP, Broadus R, Glass BJ. Bifid mandibular canals in panoramic radiographs. J Am Dent Assoc 1985;110:923-6. (Crossref