Dergiler / International Dental Research / 2019 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3

Evaluation of shear bond strength of amalgam restorations repaired with composite resin by different surface treatments

Sayfa
105–110
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The differences between the groups werestatistically significant (p

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Aim: Repairing amalgam restorations with composite resins is a clinicalpractice with many advantages.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In this study, the effect of adhesive systems appliedon amalgam surface on composite-amalgam connection was investigated.Methodology: Standard cavities were opened in 70 acrylic molds thathad completed their polymerization and amalgams were placed in thesecavities.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The differences between the groups werestatistically significant (p
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Aim: Repairing amalgam restorations with composite resins is a clinicalpractice with many advantages. An effective adhesion is achievedbetween amalgam and composite by applied different surface treatmenton amalgam surface. In this study, the effect of adhesive systems appliedon amalgam surface on composite-amalgam connection was investigated.Methodology: Standard cavities were opened in 70 acrylic molds thathad completed their polymerization and amalgams were placed in thesecavities. Seven groups were randomly assigned to different surfacetreatments on amalgam. In group 1 only roughening with diamond bur, ingroup 2 acid etch, in group 3 acid application after roughening withdiamond bur, in group 4 roughening with diamond bur and silane, in group5 acid etch and silane, in group 6 roughening with diamond bur and AlloyPrimer and finally 7. acid etch and Alloy Primer was applied in thesamples. After the application of clearfil universal bond to all groups,composite resins were placed and polymerized. Shear bond strengthswere tested with a Universal testing machine. Obtained data wereevaluated by one way ANOVA and Tukey B tests.Results: In the statistical evaluation of the groups, the highest shearbond strength between amalgam-composite was seen in the 3rd groupwhere both roughening with diamond bur and acid were applied together,and the lowest shear bond strength was seen in the first group with onlyroughening with diamond bur. The differences between the groups werestatistically significant (p

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

SATICI, Ö., CANGÜL, S., ACARTÜRK, M., ADIGÜZEL, Ö., ERPAÇAL, B., ÜNAL, M. (2022). Evaluation of shear bond strength of amalgam restorations repaired with composite resin by different surface treatments. International Dental Research, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3, 105–110. https://ajindex.com/articles/651590

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. Mıhçıoğlu T. Dünden Bugüne Dental Amalgam. Gazi Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 1984;1(2):234-44
  2. Ergücü Z, Türkün LŞ, Türkün M, Özata F. Amalgam ve rezin kompozit kombine restorasyonların bağlanma direncinin incelenmesi. Gazi Üniversitesi Diş Hekim. Fakültesi Derg 2012; 29(3):147-55
  3. Erdemir A, Eldeniz A Ü, Arı H, Belli S. Farklı Bonding Sistemlerin Kompozit Bezinin Amalgama Bağlanma Dayanımı Üzerine Etkisi. Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 2005; 6(1):9-13
  4. Özcan M, Schoonbeek G, Gökçe B, Cömlekoglu E, Dündar M. Bond strength comparison of amalgam repair protocols using resin composite in situations with and without dentin exposure Oper. Dent. 2010;35(6):655–62. (Crossref
  5. Gordan V. V, Riley III J. L, Blaser P. K, Mjör I. A. 2-year clinical evaluation of alternative treatments to replacement of defective amalgam restorations. Operative dentistry 2006; 31(4):418-25. (Crossref
  6. Gordan V. V, Riley III J. L, Blaser P. K, Mondragon E, Garvan C. W, Mjör I. A. Alternative treatments to replacement of defective amalgam restorations: results of a seven-year clinical study. The Journal of the American Dental Associa 2011; 142(7):842-9. (Crossref
  7. Penning C. Repair and revision 1. Repair or replacement of amalgam. Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd 2001;108:46-9
  8. Giannini M, Paulillo L. A. M. S, Ambrosano G. M. B. Effect of surface roughness on amalgam repair using adhesive systems. Brazilian dental journal 2002;13(3):179-83. (Crossref
  9. Elderton R. J, Research on cavity design for amalgam restorations. Proceedings of the international symposium on Amalgam and tooth-colored restorative materials, Nijmegen. The Netherlands. University of Nijmegen 1975;241
  10. Hunter A. R, Treasure E. T, Hunter A. J. Increases in cavity volume associated with the removal of class 2 amalgam and composite restorations. Oper Dent. 1995;20:2-6
  11. Berry T. G, Laswell H. R, Osborne J. W, Gale E. N. Width of isthmus and marginal failure of restorations of amalgam. Oper Dent 1981;6:55-8
  12. Mondelli J, Steagall L, Ishikiriama A, Navarro M. F. L, Soares F. B. Fracture strength of human teeth with cavity preparations. J Prosthet Dent 1980;47:419-22. (Crossref
  13. Xeno V. Scientific Compendium. Dentsply DeTrey, Konstanz, Almanya, 2009
  14. Chang H. S. Effects of layering technique on the shade of resin overlays and the microhardness of dual cure resin cement. Braz Oral Res 2014; 28(1): 28. (Crossref
  15. Chang J, Scherer W, Tauk A, Mart