Dergiler / International Dental Research / 2022 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 1

Investigation the angulation of maxillary impacted canines by using cone-beam computed tomography

Sayfa
9–13
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

In the present study, no significant difference was found between angulation and canine localization and gender.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the angulation and localization of unilaterally impacted canines by using CBCT.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Results: The mean age was 35.42±12.29 years in men and 31.10±11.09 years in women.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:In the present study, no significant difference was found between angulation and canine localization and gender.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the angulation and localization of unilaterally impacted canines by using CBCT. Methodology: Seventy-two images were included in the study based on the inclusion criteria. Demographic information (age and gender), localization and angulation of the impacted canine teeth were recorded. Canine angulation was measured between the two lines drawn on the coronal section of CBCT, with the first line drawn from the crista galli to the anterior nasal spine and the second line drawn along the long axes of the impacted canine teeth. Results: The mean age was 35.42±12.29 years in men and 31.10±11.09 years in women. In women, 16 of the impacted canines were on the right and 23 were on the left side, while in men, 21 of them were on the right and 12 were on the left side. Mean angulation was 34.6° (range, 17.6°- 64.4°) for women and 36.2° (range, 21.4°-56.3°) for men. A weak negative correlation was found between patient age and angulation (p=0.49, rho = - 0.233). Conclusion: Angulation of maxillary impacted canines is an important predictive factor in orthodontic treatment. In the present study, no significant difference was found between angulation and canine localization and gender.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

LAÇİN, N., YALÇIN, M. (2022). Investigation the angulation of maxillary impacted canines by using cone-beam computed tomography. International Dental Research, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 1, 9–13. https://ajindex.com/articles/539435

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (1)

  1. Hitchen AD. The impacted maxillary canine. Br Dent J 1956; 100:1−14. Ericson S, Kurol J. Radiographic assessment of maxillary canine eruption in children with clinical signs of eruption disturbances. Eur J Orthod 1986; 8(3):133−140. (Crossref) Dachi SF, Howell FV. A survey of 3,874 routine full-mouth radiographs. II. A study of impacted teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1961; 14(10):1165−1169. (Crossref) Yan B, Sun Z, Fields H, Wang L. Maxillary Canine Impaction Increases Root Resorption Risk of Adjacent Teeth: A Problem of Physical Proximity. Orthod Fr 2015; 86(2):169-79. (Crossref) Bishara SE. Impacted maxillary canines: a review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992; 101:159-71. (Crossref) Grisar K, Piccart F, Al-Rimawi AS, Basso I, Politis C, Jacobs R. Three-dimensional Position of Impacted Maxillary Canines: Prevalence, Associated Pathology and Introduction to a New Classification System. Clin Exp Dent Res 2019; 5(1):19-25. (Crossref) Malik DS, Fida M, Sukhia RH. Correlation between radiographic parameters for the prediction of palatally impacted maxillary canines. J Orthod 2019; 46(1):6-13. (Crossref) Haney E, Gansky SA, Lee JS, Johnson E, Maki K, Miller AJ, et al. Comparative analysis of traditional radiographs and cone beam computed tomography volumetric images in the diagnosis and treatment planning of maxillary impacted canines. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010; 137:590–597. (Crossref) Counihan K, Al-Awadhi EA, Butler J. Guidelines for the assessment of the impacted maxillary canine. Dent Update 2013; 40(9):770-7. (Crossref) Chapokas AR, Almas K, Schincaglia GP. The Impacted Maxillary Canine: A Proposed Classification for Surgical Exposure. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2012; 113(2):222-8. (Crossref) Alqerban A, Jacobs R, Fieuws S, Willems G. Radiographic predictors for maxillary canine impaction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2015; 147(3):345-54. (Crossref) Bazargani F, Magnuson A, Dolati A, Lennartsson B. Palatally Displaced Maxillary Canines: Factors Influencing Duration and Cost of Treatment. Eur J Orthod 2013; 35(3):310-6. (Crossref)