Female patients showed higher prevalence (41.27%) than themale patients (39.32%).Conclusions: MSS was observed in 40.28% of examined Turkish subjectsand detected more frequently in females and on the bilateral side.
📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale
🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Aim: The aim of the study was to examine the prevalence of maxillarysinus septa (MSS) in a Turkish population, using cone-beam computedtomography (CBCT).Methodology: The CBCT images of 350 untreated patients (178 male,172 female ranging in age between 18 and 65) were included in this study.The presence or absence of MSS was determined in axial, sagittal, andcoronal planes by considering gender and side.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:For statistical evaluation,a chi‐square test was used to determine any differences in the prevalenceof MSS with significance set at 5%.Results: MSSs were observed in 201 out of 700 sides (28.71%) and 141 outof 350 patients (40.28%), of which, 70 were in males and 71 in females.MSS were also observed in a higher prevalence on the bilateral side.(17.14%).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Female patients showed higher prevalence (41.27%) than themale patients (39.32%).Conclusions: MSS was observed in 40.28% of examined Turkish subjectsand detected more frequently in females and on the bilateral side.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri
Abstract
Aim: The aim of the study was to examine the prevalence of maxillarysinus septa (MSS) in a Turkish population, using cone-beam computedtomography (CBCT).Methodology: The CBCT images of 350 untreated patients (178 male,172 female ranging in age between 18 and 65) were included in this study.The presence or absence of MSS was determined in axial, sagittal, andcoronal planes by considering gender and side. For statistical evaluation,a chi‐square test was used to determine any differences in the prevalenceof MSS with significance set at 5%.Results: MSSs were observed in 201 out of 700 sides (28.71%) and 141 outof 350 patients (40.28%), of which, 70 were in males and 71 in females.MSS were also observed in a higher prevalence on the bilateral side.(17.14%). Female patients showed higher prevalence (41.27%) than themale patients (39.32%).Conclusions: MSS was observed in 40.28% of examined Turkish subjectsand detected more frequently in females and on the bilateral side.
🔖
Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap
LAÇİN, N., İZOL, B. S. (2022). Evaluation of septas in maxillary sinus with cone-beam computed tomography. International Dental Research, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2, 41–45. https://ajindex.com/articles/539525
Şimşek Kaya G, Daltaban Ö, Kaya M, Kocabalkan B, Sindel A, Akdağ M. The potential clinical relevance of anatomical structures and variations of the maxillary sinus for planned sinus floor elevation procedures: A retrospective cone beam computed tomography study. Clin Implant Dent Related Res 2019;21(1):114-21. (Crossref
Starch-Jensen T, Aludden H, Hallman M, Dahlin C, Christensen AE, Mordenfeld A. A systematic review and meta-analysis of long-term studies (five or more years) assessing maxillary sinus floor augmenta- tion. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2017;47: 103- 16. (Crossref
Vazquez JCM, de Rivera ASG, Gil HS, Mifsut RS. Complication rate in 200 consecutive sinus lift procedures: guidelines for prevention and treatment. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014;72: 892- 901. (Crossref
Bornstein MM, Seiffert C, Maestre-Ferrín L, et al. An analysis of fre- quency, morphology, and locations of maxillary sinus septa using cone beam computed tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2016;31: 280-7. (Crossref
Jung J, Yim JH, Kwon YD, et al. A radiographic study of the position and prevalence of the maxillary arterial endosseous anastomosis using cone beam computed tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011;26:1273-8
Rancitelli D, Borgonovo AE, Cicciu M, et al. Maxillary sinus septa and anatomic correlation with the Schneiderian membrane. J Craniofac Surg 2015;26:1394–8. (Crossref
Maestre-Ferrin L, Galan-Gil S, Rubio-Serrano M, Penarrocha- Diago M, Penarrocha-Oltra D. Maxillary sinus septa: a systematic review. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2010;15: e383– 6. (Crossref
Hungerbühler A, Rostetter C, Lübbers HT, Rücker M, Stadlinger B. Anatomical characteristics of maxillary sinus septa visualized by cone beam computed tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2019;48(3): 382-7. (Crossref
Dragan E, Odri GA, Melian G, Haba D, Olszewski R. Threedimensional evaluation of maxillary sinus septa for implant placement. Med Sci Monit. 2017;23: 1394-1400. (Crossref
Orhan K, Kusakci Seker B, Aksoy S, Bayindir H, Berberoğlu A, Seker E. Cone beam CT evaluation of maxillary sinus septa prevalence, height, location and morphology in children and an adult population. Med Princ Pract 2013;22(1): 47-53. (Crossref
Goga D1, Romieux G, Bonin B, Picard A, Saffarzadeh A. Preim