Dergiler / International Dental Research / 2021 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: Supplement 1

Current approach to bone augmentation with allogeneic cortical graft: A case report

Sayfa
299–302
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusion: Allogeneic grafts in the treatment of alveolar crest defects; it is a good alternative to autogenous bone grafts, there is no need for a second surgical field and the resulting reduction in morbidity.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Aim: Today, dental implant applications have become the most preferred option in the treatment of tooth deficiencies.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Methodology: A 58-year-old female patient without any systemic disease was admitted to our clinic with the complaint of tooth loss in the right posterior mandibular region.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusion: Allogeneic grafts in the treatment of alveolar crest defects; it is a good alternative to autogenous bone grafts, there is no need for a second surgical field and the resulting reduction in morbidity.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Aim: Today, dental implant applications have become the most preferred option in the treatment of tooth deficiencies. Long-term successful results in dental implant applications depend largely on the volume and quality of the hard and soft tissues in the relevant region. Insufficient soft tissues and alveolar crest resorption complicate implant applications. Grafts and additional surgical procedures are required to compensate for resorption and to provide bone augmentation. Shell technique, one of the augmentation methods used in the treatment of alveolar bone defects, is an important procedure for guided bone regeneration. The purpose of this case report is to describe the treatment of vertical and horizontal bone loss with the Shell technique using allogeneic cortical grafts. Methodology: A 58-year-old female patient without any systemic disease was admitted to our clinic with the complaint of tooth loss in the right posterior mandibular region. In the intraoral and radiological examinations, it was determined that the bone volume in the relevant region was not sufficient for dental implant. Two-stage surgical treatment was planned for the patient. First, vertical and horizontal bone defects were augmented with allogeneic cortical graft application under local anesthesia. After the healing process, dental implants were placed in the sufficient volume of the alveolar bone and the patient's treatment was completed. Conclusion: Allogeneic grafts in the treatment of alveolar crest defects; it is a good alternative to autogenous bone grafts, there is no need for a second surgical field and the resulting reduction in morbidity.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

YILMAZ, U. N., DERKUŞ, F. E. (2022). Current approach to bone augmentation with allogeneic cortical graft: A case report. International Dental Research, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: Supplement 1, 299–302. https://ajindex.com/articles/539462

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Jacotti M, Bernardello F. Allogeneic Block Grafts in the Posterior Mandible. Bone Augmentation by Anatomical Region,2020; 445–452. (Crossref
  2. Ersu B. İmplant Diş Hekimliğinde Kullanılan Ağız İçi Otojen Kemik Greftleri. Cum Üni Diş Hek Dergisi 2007; 10: 135–140
  3. Bernstein S, Cooke J, Fotek P, Wang HL. Vertical Bone Augmentation: Where Are We Now? Implant Dent 2006; 15: 219- 228. (Crossref
  4. Misch CE, Dietsh F. Bone-grafting materials in implant dentistry. Implant Dent 1993; 2: 158-67. (Crossref
  5. Marx RE. Clinical application of bone biology to mandibular and maxillary reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg 1994; 21: 377-92. (Crossref
  6. Khoury F, Ponte A. The three-dimensional reconstruction of the alve- olar crest with mandibular bone block graft: a clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19:795-766
  7. Khoury F, Khoury C. Mandibular Bone Block Grefts: Diagnosis, instrumentation, harvesting techniques and surgical procedures. A. H. Khoury F içinde, Bone augmentation in oral implantology 2007; 115- 207. New Malden: Quintessence
  8. Kruger GO. Text Book of Oral and Maksillofacial Surgery. St. Louis: The CV Mosby; 1984
  9. Misch CM, Misch CE, Resnik RR, and Ismail YH. Reconstruction of maxillary alveolar defects with mandibular symphysis grafts for dental implants: A preliminary procedural report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992; 7:360–366
  10. De Santis D, Trevisiol L, D’Agostino A. et al. Guided bone regeneration with autogenous block grafts applied to Le Fort I osteotomy for treatment of severely resorbed maxillae: A 4‐ to 6‐year prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 23: 60– 69. (Crossref
  11. Misch CM. Comparison of intraoral donor sites for onlay grafting prior to implant placement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997; 12: 767–776
  12. Misch CM. Use of the mandibular ramus as a donor site for onlay bone grafting. J Oral Implantol 2000; 26: 42–49. (Crossref
  13. Keith JD, Jr Petrungaro P, Leonetti JA. et al. Clinical and histologic evaluation of a mineralized block allograft: Results from the developmental period (2001– 2004). Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2006; 26:321–327
  14. Jacotti M, Wang HL, Fu JH. et al. Ridge augmentation with mineralized block allografts: Clinical and histological evaluation of 8 cases treated with the 3‐dimensional block technique. Implant Dent 2012; 21: 444–448. (Crossref)