Dergiler / International Dental Research / 2019 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3

Oral and maxillofacial surgery and dental rehabilitation under sedation and general anesthesia

Sayfa
111–118
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

However, due to the risks associated with GA, anestheticprocedures should only be performed by experienced anesthetists underoperating room conditions.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Aim: The aim of this study was to retrospectively analyze dentalprocedures performed under general anesthesia (GA) or deep sedation atDicle University Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Oral andMaxillofacial Surgery from May 2013 to May 2018.Methodology: This study included 182 patients treated under GA andsedation from May 2013 to May 2018.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Children andadults were compared in terms of general anesthesia (GA) and deepsedation (SD).Results: Of 182 patients (age range: 1–61 years), 63 were had anAmerican Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) status of I (completely healthy)and 119 were of ASA II status (mild systemic disease).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:However, due to the risks associated with GA, anestheticprocedures should only be performed by experienced anesthetists underoperating room conditions.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:2013 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to retrospectively analyze dentalprocedures performed under general anesthesia (GA) or deep sedation atDicle University Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Oral andMaxillofacial Surgery from May 2013 to May 2018.Methodology: This study included 182 patients treated under GA andsedation from May 2013 to May 2018. The records of these cases werereviewed retrospectively in terms of patient demographic characteristics,medical history, dental procedures, and treatment duration. Children andadults were compared in terms of general anesthesia (GA) and deepsedation (SD).Results: Of 182 patients (age range: 1–61 years), 63 were had anAmerican Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) status of I (completely healthy)and 119 were of ASA II status (mild systemic disease). A total of 143patients (60 children and 83 adults) underwent GA, while 39 patients (18children and 21 adults) underwent deep sedation. The mean duration ofthe procedures performed under GA and deep sedation was 75 and 40min, respectively. Following the procedure, 103 patients were dischargedon the same day, whereas 78 patients required postoperative care andwere discharged on the following day. The number of patients exposedto GA and SD were 143 and 39, respectively. The number of child patientsexposed to GA was 60, while that of adults was 83.Conclusions: The frequency of dental rehabilitation under GA orsedation is increasing. Patients who cannot undergo dental proceduresunder local anesthesia can be treated under preferably GA, as long as theindications, patient characteristics, and anesthesia plan are carefullyconsidered. Data suggest that adults are more suitable for GA thanchildren. However, due to the risks associated with GA, anestheticprocedures should only be performed by experienced anesthetists underoperating room conditions.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

YILMAZ, U. N. (2022). Oral and maxillofacial surgery and dental rehabilitation under sedation and general anesthesia. International Dental Research, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3, 111–118. https://ajindex.com/articles/539536

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (16)

  1. Vargas Roman M del P, Rodriguez Bermudo S, Machuca Portillo G. Dental treatment under general anesthesia: a useful procedure in the third millennium? (1) Med Oral 2003;8:129-35
  2. Landes DP. The provision of general anaesthesia in dental practice, an end which had to come? Br Dent J. 2002 9;192:129- 31. (Crossref
  3. Karacalar S, Aykaç B. Dental girişimlerde genel anestezi uygulamaları. Marmara Med Jour. 2010;23(3):400-7
  4. Lyratzopoulos G, KM Blain. Inhalation sedation with nitros oxide as an alternative to dental general anaesthesia for children. Journal of Public Healt Medicine. 2003;25(4):303-12. (Crossref
  5. Ay S, Kambek S, Cevit Ö, Öztürk M, Yeler H, Acar G. Çocuklarda diş çekiminde sedasyon için midazolam değerlendirilmesi. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi. 1999;2(2):71-5
  6. Roelofse JA, Shipton EA, de la Harpe CJ, Blignaut RJ. Intranasal sufentanil/midasolam versus ketamine/midasolam for analgesia/sedation in pediatric populatiun prior to undergoing multiple dental extractions under general anesthesia: A prospective, double-blind, randomized comparison. Anesth Progress. 2004;51:114-21
  7. Paris ST, Cafferkey M,Tarling M,Hancock P, Yate PM, Flynn PJ. Comparison of sevoflurane and halotane for outpatient dental anesthesia in children. British J of Anesth. 1997;79:280-4. (Crossref
  8. Hargreaves JA. A clinical investication of halotane anaesthesia for dental extractions in children. J Col Gen Practit. 1963;6:395-9
  9. Küçükyavuz Z.Çocuklarda genel anestezi ile diş çekimi sırasında kullanılan sevofluran ve halotanın anestezi indüksiyonu ve postoperatif dönem açısından karşılaştırılması. Diş Hekimleri Birliği Dergisi. 2002;8(3):149-54
  10. Quinn AC, Samaan A,McAteer EM, Moss E,Vucevic M.The reinforced laringeal mask airway for dentoalveolar surgery. British Jour Anaesth. 1996;77;185-8. (Crossref
  11. Küçükyavuz Z, Açar E (Evaluation of the characteristics of patients operated under general anesthesia in dentistry).Türkiye Klinikleri J Dental Sci 2002;8(1):13-9
  12. American Dental Association. Guidelines for Teaching Pain Control and Sedation to Dentists and Dental Student. Adopted by the ADA House of Delegate, October 2007
  13. Aypar Ü. Diş Hekimliği ve Anestezi. Nobel Tıp Kitabevi, 2005. Diş hekimliği girişimlerinde sedasyon sf: 119
  14. Boyle CA. Sedation or general anaesthesia for treating anxious children. Evid Based Dent 2009;10:69. (Crossref
  15. Conscious sedation in the provision of dental care 2003
  16. Öztürk M,