Dergiler / Iğdır Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 3

Investigations of hysteresis based direct torque controlled and field oriented controlled IPM drives for electric vehicle applications

Sayfa
1477–1488
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Since the modern processors can easily deal with higher computational burden and field-oriented control is feasible in real time, it has been validated by extensive simulations that FOC based IPM drives are superior to their HB-DTC counterparts.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Direct Torque Control (DTC) techniques are widely used in the control of AC machines as an opponent of space vector pulse width modulation (SVPWM) based field-oriented control (FOC).
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In both techniques, the results have been obtained by simulating a 4.1 kW interior mounted permanent magnet synchronous (IPM) motor which has been designed and manufactured for research and development for electric vehicle traction applications.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Since the modern processors can easily deal with higher computational burden and field-oriented control is feasible in real time, it has been validated by extensive simulations that FOC based IPM drives are superior to their HB-DTC counterparts.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:FOC · HB-DTC · current distortion

Abstract

Direct Torque Control (DTC) techniques are widely used in the control of AC machines as an opponent of space vector pulse width modulation (SVPWM) based field-oriented control (FOC). In the literature, hysteresis-based DTC (HB-DTC) is a vast majority of DTC techniques as the technique do not require a position resolver or an encoder. In this study, HB-DTC and FOC techniques are compared in detail by paying particular attention to current distortions, torque ripple and computational burden. In both techniques, the results have been obtained by simulating a 4.1 kW interior mounted permanent magnet synchronous (IPM) motor which has been designed and manufactured for research and development for electric vehicle traction applications. The results validate that although the HBDTC drives, have pros such as having less computational burden on the processor and eliminating the need for a position sensor, they have relatively much current distortions and torque ripple and hence the results are much deteriorated. Since the modern processors can easily deal with higher computational burden and field-oriented control is feasible in real time, it has been validated by extensive simulations that FOC based IPM drives are superior to their HB-DTC counterparts.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÖZÇİFLİKÇİ, O. E., KOÇ, M. (2022). Investigations of hysteresis based direct torque controlled and field oriented controlled IPM drives for electric vehicle applications. Iğdır Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 3, 1477–1488. https://ajindex.com/articles/538456

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. Alışkan İ, Ünsal S, 2018. Speed control of permanent magnet synchronous motor by using fuzzy logic controllers having different inference methods. Pamukkale University Journal of Engineering Sciences, 24(2), 185-191.
  2. Alyakhni A, Boulon L, Vinassa J. M, Briat O, 2021. A Comprehensive Review on Energy Management Strategies for Electric Vehicles Considering Degradation Using Aging Models. IEEE Access, 9, 143922-143940.
  3. Ben Mahdhi H, Ben Azza H, Jemli M, 2022. Inverter open-circuit fault diagnosis method in PMSG based wind energy conversion system. Electrical Engineering, 104(3), 1317-1330. Bıçak A,Gelen A, 2021. Sensorless direct torque control based on seven-level torque hysteresis controller for five-phase IPMSM using a sliding-mode observer. Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal, 24(5), 1134-1143.
  4. Bingöl O, Elmas C, 2017. Virtual lab: Space vector PWM for two-and three-level inverters. Pamukkale University Journal of Engineering Sciences, 23, 95-102.
  5. Can Güven E, Gedik K, 2019. Ömrünü Tamamlamış Elektrikli Araç Bataryalarının Çevresel Yönetimi. Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology, 9 (2), 726-737.
  6. Candelo-Zuluaga C, Riba J. R, Garcia A, 2021. PMSM Parameter Estimation for Sensorless FOC Based on Differential Power Factor. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 70, 1-12.
  7. Chokkalingham, B, Padmanaban, S, Blaabjerg F, 2018. Investigation and Comparative Analysis of Advanced PWM Techniques for Three-Phase Three-Level NPC-MLI Drives. Electric Power Components and Systems, 46(3), 258-269.
  8. Deng W, Li S, 2021. Direct Torque Control of Matrix Converter-Fed PMSM Drives Using Multidimensional Switching Table for Common-Mode Voltage Minimization. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 36(1), 683-690.
  9. Ge Y, Yang L, Ma X, 2020. Adaptive sliding mode control based on a combined state/disturbance observer for the disturbance rejection control of PMSM. Electrical Engineering, 102(4), 1863-1879.
  10. Hakami S, Lee K.-B, 2020. Four-Level Hysteresis-Based DTC for Torque Capability Improvement of IPMSM Fed by Three-Level NPC Inverter. Electronics, 9, 1558. Kesler S, 2018. Performance Analysis of Different PWM Techniques on V/f-based Speed Control with Boost Voltage Application for Induction Motors. Pamukkale University Journal of Engineering Sciences, 24, 797-808.
  11. Kim S, Seok J, 2013. Maximum Voltage Utilization of IPMSMs Using Modulating Voltage Scalability for Automotive Applications. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics,