KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Eurasian Journal of Emergency Medicine / 2021 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 1

Knowledge Level and Beliefs of Patients and Their Relatives aboutHypnosis and Their Attitudes toward Use of Hypnosis for Sedationand Analgesia Purposes in the Emergency Department

serhat koyuncu
Harun Güneş
Sayfa
25–34
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

They preferred hypnosis only in the case of the existence or possibility of drug dependence (mean ± standart deviation=3.78±1.979).Conclusion: Participants were mostly misled by improper sources of information so they were seen to be reluctant to prefer hypnosis in all clinical scenarios other than the existence or possibility of drug dependence

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Aim: To evaluate the knowledge level and beliefs of patients and their relatives about hypnosis and their attitudes toward use of hypnosis for sedation and analgesia purposes in the emergency department.Materials and Methods: The study was conducted as a two-center study.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The total number of participants recruited into the study was 384.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:They preferred hypnosis only in the case of the existence or possibility of drug dependence (mean ± standart deviation=3.78±1.979).Conclusion: Participants were mostly misled by improper sources of information so they were seen to be reluctant to prefer hypnosis in all clinical scenarios other than the existence or possibility of drug dependence
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the knowledge level and beliefs of patients and their relatives about hypnosis and their attitudes toward use of hypnosis for sedation and analgesia purposes in the emergency department.Materials and Methods: The study was conducted as a two-center study. The total number of participants recruited into the study was 384. A questionnaire including socio-demographic features, sources of information, knowledge and beliefs about hypnosis, and attitudes of participants toward the use of hypnosis in the emergency department in different clinical scenarios was used. Overall results of total study sample and differences between various sub-groups were evaluated.Results: Mean age of participants was 34.27 years. Two hundred and sixteen (56.3%) participants were male. Television was the source of information with the highest effect on the knowledge of participants about hypnosis. Participants were seen to mostly believe myths about hypnosis. They preferred hypnosis only in the case of the existence or possibility of drug dependence (mean ± standart deviation=3.78±1.979).Conclusion: Participants were mostly misled by improper sources of information so they were seen to be reluctant to prefer hypnosis in all clinical scenarios other than the existence or possibility of drug dependence

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

koyuncu, S., Güneş, H. (2022). Knowledge Level and Beliefs of Patients and Their Relatives aboutHypnosis and Their Attitudes toward Use of Hypnosis for Sedationand Analgesia Purposes in the Emergency Department. Eurasian Journal of Emergency Medicine, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 1, 25–34. https://ajindex.com/articles/507916

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (20)

  1. Iserson KV. An hypnotic suggestion: review of hypnosis for clinical emergency care. J Emerg Med. 2014;46:588-96
  2. Deltito JA. Hypnosis in the treatment of acute pain in the emergency department setting. Postgrad Med J. 1984;60:263-6
  3. Iserson KV. Hypnosis for pediatric fracture reduction. J Emerg Med. 1999;17:53-6
  4. Birnie KA, Noel M, Parker JA, Chambers CT, Uman LS, Kisely SR, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of distraction and hypnosis for needlerelated pain and distress in children and adolescents. J Pediatr Psychol. 2014;39:783-808
  5. Accardi MC, Milling LS. The effectiveness of hypnosis for reducing procedurerelated pain in children and adolescents: a comprehensive methodological review. J Behav Med. 2009;32:328-39
  6. Wood C, Bioy A. Hypnosis and pain in children. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2008;35:437-46
  7. Catoire P, Delaunay L, Dannappel T, Baracchini D, Marcadet-Fredet S, Moreau O, et al. Hypnosis versus diazepam for embryo transfer: a randomized controlled study. Am J Clin Hypn. 2013;55:378-86
  8. Güler N. SS-584 Hipnosis in an emergency department, less chemistry, saving time. In: Proceedings of the 5th Intercontinental Emergency Medicine Congress; 2018; Apr 19-22; Antalya, Turkey. 2018.p.243
  9. Levine JD, Gordon NC, Fields HL. The mechanism of placebo analgesia. Lancet. 1978;2:654-7
  10. Goldstein A, Hilgard ER. Failure of the opiate antagonist naloxone to modify hypnotic analgesia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1975;72:2041-3
  11. Bierman SF. Hypnosis in the emergency department. Am J Emerg Med. 1989;7:238-42
  12. Goldie L. Hypnosis in the Casualty Department. Br Med J. 1956;2:1340-2
  13. Iserson K. Relocating dislocations in a wilderness setting: use of hypnosis. J Wild Med. 1991;2:22-6
  14. Kohen DP. Applications of relaxation/mental imagery (self-hypnosis) in pediatric emergencies. Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 1986;34:283-94
  15. Paris PM. Pain management in the child. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 1987;5:699-707
  16. Wain HJ, Amen DG. Emergency room use of hypnosis. Gen Hosp Psych. 1986;8:19-22
  17. Johnson ME, Hauck C. Beliefs and opinions about hypnosis held by the general public: a systematic evaluation. Am J Clin Hypn. 1999;42:10-20
  18. Barling NR, De Lucchi AAG. Knowledge, attitudes and beliefs about clinical hypnosis. Aust J Clin Exp Hypn. 2004;32:36-52
  19. Green JP. Beliefs about hypnosis: popular beliefs, misconceptions, and the importance of experience. Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 2003;51:369-81
  20. Kizilkoyun F. Türkiye’nin uyuştur