SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eurasian Journal of Emergency Medicine / 2021 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 1

Knowledge Level and Beliefs of Patients and Their Relatives aboutHypnosis and Their Attitudes toward Use of Hypnosis for Sedationand Analgesia Purposes in the Emergency Department

serhat koyuncu
Harun Güneş
Pages
25–34
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Overall results of total study sample and differences between various sub-groups were evaluated.Results: Mean age of participants was 34.27 years.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: To evaluate the knowledge level and beliefs of patients and their relatives about hypnosis and their attitudes toward use of hypnosis for sedation and analgesia purposes in the emergency department.Materials and Methods: The study was conducted as a two-center study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The total number of participants recruited into the study was 384.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Overall results of total study sample and differences between various sub-groups were evaluated.Results: Mean age of participants was 34.27 years.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the knowledge level and beliefs of patients and their relatives about hypnosis and their attitudes toward use of hypnosis for sedation and analgesia purposes in the emergency department.Materials and Methods: The study was conducted as a two-center study. The total number of participants recruited into the study was 384. A questionnaire including socio-demographic features, sources of information, knowledge and beliefs about hypnosis, and attitudes of participants toward the use of hypnosis in the emergency department in different clinical scenarios was used. Overall results of total study sample and differences between various sub-groups were evaluated.Results: Mean age of participants was 34.27 years. Two hundred and sixteen (56.3%) participants were male. Television was the source of information with the highest effect on the knowledge of participants about hypnosis. Participants were seen to mostly believe myths about hypnosis. They preferred hypnosis only in the case of the existence or possibility of drug dependence (mean ± standart deviation=3.78±1.979).Conclusion: Participants were mostly misled by improper sources of information so they were seen to be reluctant to prefer hypnosis in all clinical scenarios other than the existence or possibility of drug dependence

🔖

Cite This Article

koyuncu, S., Güneş, H. (2022). Knowledge Level and Beliefs of Patients and Their Relatives aboutHypnosis and Their Attitudes toward Use of Hypnosis for Sedationand Analgesia Purposes in the Emergency Department. Eurasian Journal of Emergency Medicine, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 1, 25–34. https://ajindex.com/articles/507916

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (20)

  1. Iserson KV. An hypnotic suggestion: review of hypnosis for clinical emergency care. J Emerg Med. 2014;46:588-96
  2. Deltito JA. Hypnosis in the treatment of acute pain in the emergency department setting. Postgrad Med J. 1984;60:263-6
  3. Iserson KV. Hypnosis for pediatric fracture reduction. J Emerg Med. 1999;17:53-6
  4. Birnie KA, Noel M, Parker JA, Chambers CT, Uman LS, Kisely SR, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of distraction and hypnosis for needlerelated pain and distress in children and adolescents. J Pediatr Psychol. 2014;39:783-808
  5. Accardi MC, Milling LS. The effectiveness of hypnosis for reducing procedurerelated pain in children and adolescents: a comprehensive methodological review. J Behav Med. 2009;32:328-39
  6. Wood C, Bioy A. Hypnosis and pain in children. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2008;35:437-46
  7. Catoire P, Delaunay L, Dannappel T, Baracchini D, Marcadet-Fredet S, Moreau O, et al. Hypnosis versus diazepam for embryo transfer: a randomized controlled study. Am J Clin Hypn. 2013;55:378-86
  8. Güler N. SS-584 Hipnosis in an emergency department, less chemistry, saving time. In: Proceedings of the 5th Intercontinental Emergency Medicine Congress; 2018; Apr 19-22; Antalya, Turkey. 2018.p.243
  9. Levine JD, Gordon NC, Fields HL. The mechanism of placebo analgesia. Lancet. 1978;2:654-7
  10. Goldstein A, Hilgard ER. Failure of the opiate antagonist naloxone to modify hypnotic analgesia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1975;72:2041-3
  11. Bierman SF. Hypnosis in the emergency department. Am J Emerg Med. 1989;7:238-42
  12. Goldie L. Hypnosis in the Casualty Department. Br Med J. 1956;2:1340-2
  13. Iserson K. Relocating dislocations in a wilderness setting: use of hypnosis. J Wild Med. 1991;2:22-6
  14. Kohen DP. Applications of relaxation/mental imagery (self-hypnosis) in pediatric emergencies. Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 1986;34:283-94
  15. Paris PM. Pain management in the child. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 1987;5:699-707
  16. Wain HJ, Amen DG. Emergency room use of hypnosis. Gen Hosp Psych. 1986;8:19-22
  17. Johnson ME, Hauck C. Beliefs and opinions about hypnosis held by the general public: a systematic evaluation. Am J Clin Hypn. 1999;42:10-20
  18. Barling NR, De Lucchi AAG. Knowledge, attitudes and beliefs about clinical hypnosis. Aust J Clin Exp Hypn. 2004;32:36-52
  19. Green JP. Beliefs about hypnosis: popular beliefs, misconceptions, and the importance of experience. Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 2003;51:369-81
  20. Kizilkoyun F. Türkiye’nin uyuştur