Dergiler / Dicle Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Mühendislik Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 1

Selection of Pile Foundation Systems:An Integrated Multi-Criteria DecisionMaking

Sayfa
133–145
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Based on the findings of the case study, the methodology proposed paves the way formaking an efficient decision for pile foundation selection.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Pile foundations have been used for transmitting loads from structure to the soil.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:This study proposes an integrated methodology for selecting the most appropriate pile foundationdesign for a given soil profile.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Based on the findings of the case study, the methodology proposed paves the way formaking an efficient decision for pile foundation selection.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Pile foundations have been used for transmitting loads from structure to the soil. Design of pile foundationinvolves the determination of the design parameters such as pile type, pile diameter, pile length, pile layoutetc. This study proposes an integrated methodology for selecting the most appropriate pile foundationdesign for a given soil profile. The methodology incorporates Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) andVlsekriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR)/Preference Ranking OrganizationMethod for Enrichment Evaluations (PROMETHEE) and Finite Element Analysis (FEM). While AHP isused for determining the weights of criteria, VIKOR and PROMETHEE are employed in order to acquirefinal rankings of alternatives. Then, a finite element analysis is applied on a selected set of best alternativesto provide precise results. Finally, a case study is conducted to show the effectiveness of the proposedmethodology. Based on the findings of the case study, the methodology proposed paves the way formaking an efficient decision for pile foundation selection.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ESKİ, Ö., BAŞARI, E., ARAZ, Ö. U., TURAN, M. E. (2022). Selection of Pile Foundation Systems:An Integrated Multi-Criteria DecisionMaking. Dicle Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Mühendislik Dergisi, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 1, 133–145. https://ajindex.com/articles/487470

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (9)

  1. Vuji´c, S.; Hudej, M.; Miljanovi´c, I. Results of the promethee method application in selecting the technological system at the majdan III open pit mine. Arch. Min. Sci. 2013, 58, 1229–1240
  2. Büyüközkan, G.; Görener, A. “Evaluation of product development partners using an integrated AHP-VIKOR model,” Kybernetes, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 220–237, Feb. 2015, doi: 10.1108/K-01-2014-0019
  3. Thirugnanam, A.; Singh Sivam, S.P.S.; Saravanan, K.; Harshavardhana, N.; Kumaran, D. “Conventional Super Plastic Forming and Multi-attribute Optimization through VIKOR and ANOVA,” Int. J. Veh. Struct. Syst., vol. 12, no. 1, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.4273/ijvss.12.1.07
  4. Zavadskas, E.K.; Antuchevičienė, J.; Kapliński, O. Multi-criteria decision making in civil engineering. Part II – applications. Eng. Struct. Technol. 2015, 7, pp.151–167. doi:10.3846/2029882X.2016.1139664
  5. Navarro Martínez, I.; Martí Albiñana, J.V.; Yepes Piqueras, V. Multi-Criteria Decision Making Techniques in Civil Engineering Education for Sustainability. ICERI2018 Proc. 2018, 1, 9798–9807
  6. Rehman, A.U.; Abidi, M.H.; Umer, U. MultiCriteria Decision-Making Approach for Selecting Wind Energy Power Plant Locations. Sustainability 2019, 11, 6112
  7. Kolios, A.; Collu, M.; Chahardehi, A; Brennan, F.P.; Patel, M.H. A multi-criteria decision making method to compare support structures for offshore wind turbines, EWEC, Warsaw, Poland, 2010
  8. Zavadskas, E.K.; Turskis, Z.; Vilutiene, T. Multiple criteria analysis of foundation instalment alternatives by applying Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS) method. Arch. Civ. Mech. Eng. 2010, 10, pp.123–141. doi:10.1016/S1644-9665(12)60141-1 9. Sušinskas, S.; Zavadskas, E.K.; Turskis, Z. Multiple Criteria Assessment of Pile-Columns Alternatives, Balt. J. Road Bridg. Eng. 2011, 6, pp.145–152. doi:10.3846/bjrbe.2011.19
  9. Zavadskas, E.K.; Sušinskas, S.; Daniūnas, A.; Turskis, Z.; Sivilevičius, H. Multiple criteria selection of pile-column construction technology. J. Civ. Eng. Manag. 2012, 18, pp.834–842. Doi:10.3846/13923730.2012.744537 11. Dachowski R. and Gałek K. Selection of the Best Method for Underpinning Foundations Using the PROMETHEE II Method, Sustainability 2020, 12, 5373; doi:10.3390/su12135373 12. Turskis, Z.; Daniūnas, A.; Zavadskas, E.K.; Medzvieckas, J. Multicriteria Evaluation of Building Foundation Alternatives. Comput. Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 2016, 31, pp.717–729. doi:10.1111/mice.12202 13. Saaty, T.L. The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority S