KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Contemporary Educational Technology / 2017 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2

Effects of Inquiry Types on States Related to Community of Inquiry in Online Learning Environments: An Explanatory Case Study

Mustafa Serkan GUNBATAR
Tolga GUYER
Sayfa
158–175
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

According to these findings, we can arrive at the conclusion that, within the scope of Community of Inquiry, the students in the guided inquiry group had a more efficient working process than the students in the open inquiry group.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The purpose of this study, with reference to Community of Inquiry, is to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of Learning activities based on Online Inquiry differentiating as Open and Guided Inquiries.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:According to the Community of Inquiry index results, scores of all guided inquiry students in terms of the scale were higher at a statistically significant level than those of open group.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:According to these findings, we can arrive at the conclusion that, within the scope of Community of Inquiry, the students in the guided inquiry group had a more efficient working process than the students in the open inquiry group.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

The purpose of this study, with reference to Community of Inquiry, is to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of Learning activities based on Online Inquiry differentiating as Open and Guided Inquiries. This study employs mixed research method and explanatory design. The data were collected with the Community of Inquiry Index and the Student Process Survey. According to the Community of Inquiry index results, scores of all guided inquiry students in terms of the scale were higher at a statistically significant level than those of open group. Similarly, regarding the subscales of community of inquiry index teaching presence and cognitive presence factor scores were higher in favor of the guided inquiry students. There is no significant difference between the social presence scores of the groups. Obtained qualitative data also support this result. According to these findings, we can arrive at the conclusion that, within the scope of Community of Inquiry, the students in the guided inquiry group had a more efficient working process than the students in the open inquiry group.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

GUNBATAR, M. S., GUYER, T. (2022). Effects of Inquiry Types on States Related to Community of Inquiry in Online Learning Environments: An Explanatory Case Study. Contemporary Educational Technology, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2, 158–175. https://ajindex.com/articles/476630

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (4)

  1. Akyol, Z., et al. (2009). Response to the review of the community of inquiry framework. Journal of Distance Education, 23(2), 123-136.
  2. Altunsoy, S. (2008). Ortaöğretim biyoloji ogretiminde arastirmaya dayalı ogrenme yaklasiminin ogrencilerin bilimsel surec becerilerine, akademik basarilarina ve tutumlarina etkisi (Unpublished master's thesis). Secuk University, Konya. Arbaugh, J. B., Cleveland-lnnes, M., Diaz, S. R., Garrison, D. R., Ice, P., Richardson, J. C., Swan, K. P. (2008). Developing community of inquiry instrument: Testing measure of the community of inquiry framework using multi-institutional sample. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(3), 133--136. Arslan, A. (2007). Fen egitiminde arastirmaya dayali ogretim yonteminin kavramsal ogrenmeye etkisi (Unpublished master's thesis). Marmara University, lstanbul. Buyukozturk, S., Akgun, O. E., Ozkahveci, O., Demirel, F. (2004). The validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire. Educational Sciences: Theory Practice, 4(2), 231--237. Buyukozturk, S. (2010). Sosyal bilimler icin veri analiziel kitabi (20 th ed.). Ankara:Pegem A.Coll, C., Rochera, MJ. Gispert, I. (2014). Supporting online collaborative learning in small groups: Teacher feedback on learning content, academic task and social participation. Computers Education, 75, 53--64. Caliskan, H. (2008). Ilkogretim 7. sinifsosyal bilgiler dersinde arastirmaya dayali ogrenme yak/asiminin derse yonelik tutuma, basariya ve kalici/ik duzeyine etkisi Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Gazi University, Ankara.
  3. Duban, N. (2008). Ilkogretim fen ve teknoloji dersinin sorgulamaya dayali ogrenme yaklasimina gore islenmesi: Bir eylem arastirmasi. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Anadolu University, Eskisehir. Freankel, J.R. Wallen, N. E. (2009). How to design and evaluate research in education. (7th. ed.). New York: McGraw--Hill. Garrison, D. R. (2007). Online community of inquiry review: Social, cognitive, and teaching presence issues. Journal ofAsynchronous Learning Networks,11(1), 61--72. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in text--based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2), 87-- 105. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7-23.
  4. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., Ar