KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Contemporary Educational Technology / 2018 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 4

Examination of Undergraduate and Associate Degree Students’ Computer Programming Attitude and Self-Efficacy According to Thinking Style, Gender and Experience

Mustafa Serkan Günbatar
Sayfa
354–373
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

There was also a significantdifference between the participants with different programming experience levels in termsof the common effect of programming attitude and self-efficacy, whereas no difference wasfound in terms of attitude alone.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This study aimed to determine undergraduate and associate degree students’ computerprogramming attitude and self-efficacy levels, and compare them according to thinkingstyle, gender, department, weekly study time, and programming experience variables.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Results suggested that the participants with differentthinking styles showed significant differences regarding programming attitude andprogramming self-efficacy.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:There was also a significantdifference between the participants with different programming experience levels in termsof the common effect of programming attitude and self-efficacy, whereas no difference wasfound in terms of attitude alone.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

This study aimed to determine undergraduate and associate degree students’ computerprogramming attitude and self-efficacy levels, and compare them according to thinkingstyle, gender, department, weekly study time, and programming experience variables. Thestudy employed the correlational research model. The researcher attempted to reach allassociate and undergraduate students who had received the computer programmingcourse at a state university. The computer programming self-efficacy scale, the computerprogramming attitude scale, and the holistic and analytic thinking in problem-solving scalewere used to collect research data. Results suggested that the participants with differentthinking styles showed significant differences regarding programming attitude andprogramming self-efficacy. Programming attitude and thinking style were significantpredictors of programming self-efficacy. No difference was observed between genders interms of the common effect and the partial effect of programming attitude andprogramming self-efficacy. However; differences were observed between participants fromdifferent departments and with different weekly study time. There was also a significantdifference between the participants with different programming experience levels in termsof the common effect of programming attitude and self-efficacy, whereas no difference wasfound in terms of attitude alone.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Günbatar, M. S. (2022). Examination of Undergraduate and Associate Degree Students’ Computer Programming Attitude and Self-Efficacy According to Thinking Style, Gender and Experience. Contemporary Educational Technology, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 4, 354–373. https://ajindex.com/articles/476621

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (8)

  1. Adamopoulos, F. (2017). An influence model of the experience of learning programming. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). RMIT, Melbourne, Australia. Alsancak-Sarikaya, D. (2017, May). The effect of teaching programming on computational thinking skills. 11th International Computer & Instructional Technologies Symposium, Malatya, Turkey, 24-26 May 2017.
  2. Altun, A. & Mazman, S. G. (2012). Programlamaya iliskin oz yeterlilik algisi olceginin Turkce formunun gecerlilik ve guvenirlik calismasi. Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 3(2), 297-308.
  3. Altun, A. & Mazman, S. G. (2015). Identifying latent patterns in undergraduate Students’ programming profiles. Smart Learning Environments, 2(1), 1. Askar, P. & Davenport, D. (2009). An investigation of factors related to self-efficacy for Java programming among engineering students. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 8(1), 26-32.
  4. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman. Barut, E., Tugtekin, U. & Kuzu, A. (2016, October). Programlama egitiminin bilgi islemsel dusunme becerileri baglaminda incelenmesi. 4 th International Instructional Technologies & Teacher Education Symposium. Elazig, Turkey, 6-8 October2016.
  5. Baser, M. (2013). Developing attitude scale toward computer programming. The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies, 6(6), 199-215.
  6. Bergin, S. & Reilly, R. (2005, February). Programming: factors that influence success. In ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 37(1), 411-415).
  7. Byrne, P. & Lyons, G. (2001, June). The effect of student attributes on success in programming. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 33(3), 49-52).
  8. Cetin, I. & Ozden, M. Y. (2015). Development of computer programming attitude scale for university students. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 23(5), 667-672. de Raadt, M., Hamilton, M., Lister, R., Tutty, J., Baker, B., Box, I.,. & Petre, M. (2005). Approaches to learning in computer programming students and their effect on success. In Proceedings of the 28th HERDSA Annual Conference: Higher education in a changing world (HERDSA 2005) (pp. 407-414). Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia. Erol, O. & Kurt, A. A. (2017). Investigation of CEIT students’ attitudes towards programming. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Journal of Faculty of Education, 1(41), 314- 325. Fong, L. L., Sidhu, G. K., & Fook, C. Y. (2014). Exploring 21st century skills among postgraduates in Malaysia. Procedia-Social and Beha