Dergiler / Cerrahpaşa Medical Journal / 2022 / Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 1

Is There Any Relationship Between Varicocele and Reproductive Hormone Status in Non-obstructive Azoospermia?

Sayfa
17–20
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Looking from azoospermia as an endpoint of the spermatogenic failure, varicocele appears to affect testicular hormone production less than idiopathic etiology which can be attributed to genetic causes.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the reproductive hormone parameters according to the presence or absence of varicocele in patients having non-obstructive azoospermia.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Methods: A total of 111 non-obstructive azoospermic men were included in the study retrospectively.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Looking from azoospermia as an endpoint of the spermatogenic failure, varicocele appears to affect testicular hormone production less than idiopathic etiology which can be attributed to genetic causes.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the reproductive hormone parameters according to the presence or absence of varicocele in patients having non-obstructive azoospermia. Methods: A total of 111 non-obstructive azoospermic men were included in the study retrospectively. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the presence of varicocele. Thirty of 111 patients had varicocele (group 1). Control group was formed with 81 patients (group 2). Two groups were compared in terms of serum total testosterone, follicle-stimulating hormone, and luteinizing hormone. Results: Physical examination revealed varicocele in 10.8% (95% CI: 0.0854-0.1348) of the main cohort of non-obstructive azoospermia patients. Mean total testosterone level was higher in patients with varicocele compared to the other group (585 ± 412 ng/dL and 423 ± 167 ng/dL, respectively) (P = .002). The mean follicle-stimulating hormone level was lower in patients with varicocele (group 1) than patients without varicocele (group 1: 17.72 ± 13.2 mIU/mL, group 2: 21.69 ± 16.6 mIU/mL). However, this difference was not statistically significant (P = .38). Conclusions: Serum testosterone levels of non-obstructive azoospermic men with varicocele are higher than men with idiopathic non-obstructive azoospermia. Looking from azoospermia as an endpoint of the spermatogenic failure, varicocele appears to affect testicular hormone production less than idiopathic etiology which can be attributed to genetic causes.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÖZMAN, O., ÇİTGEZ, S., BÜLBÜL, E., ŞAHİN, K. C., ÖZKARA, H. (2022). Is There Any Relationship Between Varicocele and Reproductive Hormone Status in Non-obstructive Azoospermia?. Cerrahpaşa Medical Journal, Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 1, 17–20. https://ajindex.com/articles/473106

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (3)

  1. Leslie SW, Sajjad H, Siref LE. Varicocele. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island, FL, USA: StatPearls Publishing. 2021. Available at:
  2. Czaplicki M, Bablok L, Janczewski Z. Varicocelectomy in patients with azoospermia. Arch Androl. 1979;3(1):51-55. [CrossRef] 3. Whelan P, Levine L. Effects of varicocelectomy on serum testosterone. Transl Androl Urol. 2016;5(6):866-876. [CrossRef] 4. Özman O, Çitgez S, Şimşekoğlu F, Selçuk B, Özden SB, Özkara H. Effect of varicocelectomy on restoration of spermatogenesis in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia. J Urol Surg. 2019;6(2):130-134. [CrossRef] 5. Rodriguez-Rigau LJ, Weiss DB, Zukerman Z, Grotjan HE, Smith KD, Steinberger E. A possible mechanism for the detrimental effect of varicocele on testicular function in man. Fertil Steril. 1978;30(5):577- 585. [CrossRef] 6. Li F, Yue H, Yamaguchi K, et al. Effect of surgical repair on testosterone production in infertile men with varicocele: a meta-analysis. Int J Urol. 2012;19(2):149-154. [CrossRef] 7. Schlegel PN. Testicular sperm extraction: microdissection improves sperm yield with minimal tissue excision. Hum Reprod. 1999;14(1):131-135. [CrossRef] 8. Dubin L, Amelar RD. Varicocele size and results of varicocelectomy in selected subfertile men with varicocele. Fertil Steril. 1970;21(8):606- 609. [CrossRef] 9. Lambert B. The frequency of mumps and of mumps orchitis and the consequences for sexuality and fertility. Acta Genet Stat Med. 1951;2(suppl 1):1-166
  3. Bryson CF, Ramasamy R, Sheehan M, Palermo GD, Rosenwaks Z, Schlegel PN. Severe testicular atrophy does not affect the success of microdissection testicular sperm extraction. J Urol. 2014;191(1):175- 178. [CrossRef] 11. Johnsen SG. Testicular biopsy score count–a method for registration of spermatogenesis in human testes: normal values and results in 335 hypogonadal males. Hormones. 1970;1(1):2-25. [CrossRef] 12. Esteves SC, Glina S. Recovery of spermatogenesis after microsurgical subinguinal varicocele repair in azoospermic men based on testicular histology. Int Braz J Urol. 2005;31(6):541-548. [CrossRef] 13. ur Rehman K, Shahid K, Humayun H. Hypogonadotropic hypogonadism: new identification of testicular blood flow and varicocele aftertreatment with gonadotropins. Fertil Steril. 2014;102(3):700- 704.e1. [CrossRef] 14. Özman O, Bakırcıoğlu ME. Clinical impact of parental consanguineous marriage in idiopathic nonobstructive azoospermia. F S Rep. 2020;1