Dergiler / Balkan Medical Journal / 2013 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 2

Clinical features and prognostic factors of Hodgkin’s lymphoma: A single center experience

Sayfa
178–185
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusion: This is the first study that demonstrates the demographic, clinical and prognostic features of HL patients in Turkey, and provides a general picture of the HL patients in our country.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Background: Hodgkin’s lymphoma (HL) is a B cell lymphoma characterized by the presence of Reed-Sternberg cells.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:HL comprises 1% of all cancer cases and 14% of all lymphoma cases.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusion: This is the first study that demonstrates the demographic, clinical and prognostic features of HL patients in Turkey, and provides a general picture of the HL patients in our country.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Background: Hodgkin’s lymphoma (HL) is a B cell lymphoma characterized by the presence of Reed-Sternberg cells. HL comprises 1% of all cancer cases and 14% of all lymphoma cases. Aims: We designed a retrospective study to investigate the clinical features and prognostic factors of HL patients diagnosed at an experienced oncology centre. Study Design: Retrospective study. Methods: Demographic characteristics, histopathological and clinical features, treatment modalities and response to treatment were obtained from hospital records. Dates of initial diagnosis, remission and relapse, last visit and death were recorded for survival analyses. Results: We analysed data of 391 HL patients (61% male, 39% female; mean age 35.7±15.1 years). The most common classical HL histological subtype was nodular sclerosing HL (NSHL) (42.7%). The most common stage was II 50.4%. The most common chemotherapy regimen was doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine and dacarbazine (ABVD) (70.6%). Five and 10-year survival rates were 90% and 84%, respectively. Early-stage patients with good prognostic factors had better overall and relapse-free survival rates. The presence of “B” symptoms, albumin level, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score, and LDH were prognostic factors that affect the survival in both univariate and multivariate analyses. Conclusion: This is the first study that demonstrates the demographic, clinical and prognostic features of HL patients in Turkey, and provides a general picture of the HL patients in our country.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

SELEK, U., ÇELİK, İ., YILDIZ, F., KARS, A., BARIŞTA, İ., ÜLGER, Ş., TEKUZMAN, G., ÖZIŞIK, Y., KILIÇKAP, S. (2022). Clinical features and prognostic factors of Hodgkin’s lymphoma: A single center experience. Balkan Medical Journal, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 2, 178–185. https://ajindex.com/articles/461600

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (5)

  1. Ferlay J, Bray F, Pisani P, et al (Eds). GLOBOCAN 2002: Cancer Incidence, Mortality and Prevalence Worldwide. Lyon: IARC Press; 2004
  2. Pahwa P, Karunanayake CP, Spinelli JJ, Dosman JA, McDuffie HH. Ethnicity and incidence of Hodgkin’s lymphoma in Canadian population. BMC Cancer 2009;9:141-9. [CrossRef] 3. Yung L, Linch D. Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Lancet 2003;361:943-51. [CrossRef] 4. MacLennan KA, Bennett MH, Tu A, Hudson BV, Easterling MJ, Hudson GV, et al. Relationship of histopathologic features to survival and relapse in nodular sclerosing Hodgkin’s disease. A study of 1659 patients. Cancer 1989;64:1686-93. [CrossRef] 5. Al-Salam S, John A, Daoud S, Chong SM, Castella A. Expression of Epstein-Barr virus in Hodgkin’s lymphoma in a population of United Arab Emirates nationals. Leuk Lymphoma 2008;49:1769- 77. [CrossRef] 6. Connors JM. State-of-the-art therapeutics: Hodgkin’s lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:6400-8. [CrossRef] 7. Fong D, Steurer M, Greil R, Gunsilius E, Spizzo G, Gastl G, et al. Hodgkin’s lymphoma in Tyrol-a population-based study. Ann Hematol 2009;88:449-56. [CrossRef] 8. McMahon B. Epidemiological evidence on the nature of Hodgkin’s disease. Cancer 1957;10:1045-54. [CrossRef] 9. Gutensohn NM, Shapiro DS. Social class risk factors among children with Hodgkin’s disease. Int J Cancer. 1982;30:433-5. [CrossRef] 10. Coskun HS, Er O, Eser B, et al. Early stage Hodgkin’s disease: Experiences of Erciyes University. Erciyes Med J 2002;24:120-5
  3. Hodgson DC, Gospodarowicz MK. Clinical evaluation and staging of Hodgkin’s lymphoma. In: Hoppe RT, Mauch PM, Armitage JO, Diehl V, Weiss LM (Eds): Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2007, pp 123-32
  4. Hoppe RT, Hanlon AL, Hanks GE, Owen JB. Progress in the treatment of Hodgkin’s disease in the United States, 1973 versus 1983. The Patterns of Care Study. Cancer 1994;74:3198-203. [CrossRef] 13. Kennedy BJ, Loeb V Jr, Peterson VM, Donegan WL, Natarajan N, Mettlin C. National survey of patterns of care for Hodgkin’s disease. Cancer 1985;56:2547-56. [CrossRef] 14. Hasenclever D, Diehl V. A prognostic score for advanced Hodgkin’s disease. International Prognostic Factors Project on Advanced Hodgkin’s Disease. N Engl J Med 1998;339:1506-14. [CrossRef] 15. Cosset JM, Henry-Amar M, Noordijk P, et al. The EORTC trials for adult patients with early stage Hodgkin’s disease. A 1997 update; 39th Ann Sci Meet ASTRO, Orlando, FL. 1997
  5. Klimm BD, Engert A, Brillant C, et al. Comparison