Dergiler / Balkan Medical Journal / 2016 / Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 3

Linguistic Validation of the Turkish Version of the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory - Head and Neck Cancer Module

Sayfa
339–343
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Only 5 of the 26of participants reported trouble completing any singlequestionnaire items, namely the "difficulty remembering"item for 3 individuals.Conclusion: The T-MDASI-HN is linguistically validwith ease of completion, relevance, comprehensibility,and applicability and it can be a useful clinical and researchtool.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Background: The use of patient symptom reports withfrequent symptom assessment may be preferred overthe more commonly used health-related quality of lifequestionnaires.Aims: We sought to linguistically validate the Turkishversion of the M.D.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Overall, 97 percent of the individualTMDASI-HN items were completed.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Only 5 of the 26of participants reported trouble completing any singlequestionnaire items, namely the "difficulty remembering"item for 3 individuals.Conclusion: The T-MDASI-HN is linguistically validwith ease of completion, relevance, comprehensibility,and applicability and it can be a useful clinical and researchtool.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Background: The use of patient symptom reports withfrequent symptom assessment may be preferred overthe more commonly used health-related quality of lifequestionnaires.Aims: We sought to linguistically validate the Turkishversion of the M.D. Anderson Symptom InventoryHeadand Neck module (MDASI-HN) patient reportedoutcome questionnaire.Study Design: Validation study.Methods: Following standard forward and backwardtranslation of the original and previously validatedEnglish MDASI-HN into a Turkish version (T-MDASIHN),it was administered to patients with head and neckcancer able to read and understand Turkish. Patientswere then cognitively debriefed to evaluate their understandingand comprehension of the T-MDASI-HN.Individual and group responses are presented using descriptivestatistics.Results: Twenty-six participants with head and neckcancer completed the T-MDASIHN and accompanyingcognitive debriefing. Overall, 97 percent of the individualTMDASI-HN items were completed. Averagerecorded time to complete the 28 item TMDASI-HNquestionnaire was 5.4 minutes (range 2-10). Averageoverall ease of completion, understandability, and acceptabilitywere favorably rated at 1.0, 1.1, and 0.2,respectively, on scales from 0 to 10. Only 5 of the 26of participants reported trouble completing any singlequestionnaire items, namely the "difficulty remembering"item for 3 individuals.Conclusion: The T-MDASI-HN is linguistically validwith ease of completion, relevance, comprehensibility,and applicability and it can be a useful clinical and researchtool.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

SELEK, U., ÖZYAR, E., ATALAR, B., GUNN, G. B., MENDOZA, T. R., CLEELAND, C. S., ROSENTHAL, D. I. (2022). Linguistic Validation of the Turkish Version of the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory - Head and Neck Cancer Module. Balkan Medical Journal, Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 3, 339–343. https://ajindex.com/articles/461356

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Rosenthal DI, Mendoza TR, Fuller CD, Hutcheson KA, Wang XS, Hanna EY, et al. Patterns of symptom burden during radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy for head and neck cancer: a prospective analysis using the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Symptom Inventory-Head and Neck Module. Cancer 2014
  2. [CrossRef] 2. Basch E, Abernethy AP, Mullins CD, Reeve BB, Smith ML, Coons SJ, et al. Recommendations for incorporating patient-reported outcomes into clinical comparative effectiveness research in adult oncology. J Clin Oncol 2012
  3. [CrossRef] 3. Cleeland CS, Sloan JA. Assessing the Symptoms of Cancer Using Patient-Reported Outcomes (ASCPRO): searching for standards. J Pain Symptom Manage 2010
  4. [CrossRef] 4. Cleeland CS, Mendoza TR, Wang XS, Chou C, Harle MT, Morrisey M, et al. Assessing symptom distress in cancer patients: the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory. Cancer 2000
  5. [CrossRef] 5. Ivanova MO, Ionova TI, Kalyadina SA, Uspenskaya OS, Kishtovich AV, Guo H, et al. Cancer-related symptom assessment in Russia: validation and utility of the Russian M. D. Anderson Symptom Inventory. J Pain Symptom Manage 2005
  6. [CrossRef] 6. Lin C-C, Chang A-P, Cleeland CS, Mendoza TR, Wang XS. Taiwanese version of the M. D. Anderson symptom inventory: symptom assessment in cancer patients. J Pain Symptom Manage 2007
  7. [CrossRef] 7. Mystakidou K, Cleeland C, Tsilika E, Katsouda E, Primikiri A, Parpa E, et al. Greek M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory: validation and utility in cancer patients. Oncology 2004
  8. [CrossRef] 8. Okuyama T, Wang XS, Akechi T, Mendoza TR, Hosaka T, Cleeland CS, et al. Japanese version of the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory: a validation study. J Pain Symptom Manage 2003
  9. [CrossRef] 9. Wang XS, Wang Y, Guo H, Mendoza Tr, Hao XS, Cleeland CS. Chinese version of the M. D. Anderson Symptom Inventory: validation and application of symptom measurement in cancer patients. Cancer 2004
  10. [CrossRef] 10. Yun YH, Mendoza TR, Kang IO, You CH, Roh JW, Lee CG, et al. Validation study of the Korean version of the M. D. Anderson Symptom Inventory. J Pain Symptom Manage 2006
  11. [CrossRef] 11. Rosenthal DI, Mendoza TR, Chambers MS, Asper JA, Gning I, Kies MS, et al. Measuring head and neck cancer symptom burden: the development and validation of the M. D. Anderson symptom inventory, head and neck module. Head Neck 2007
  12. [CrossRef] 12. Rosenthal DI, Men