Dergiler / Balkan Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering / 2020 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 4

Development of Short Forms of Scales with Decision Tree Algorithms

Sayfa
285–290
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

So high participation rates for scales can be obtain.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Scales or surveys are among the measurement tools developed to measure the perceptions of individuals on specified topics.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In some cases, the length of these measuring tools may negatively affect the response rates of individuals towards these tools.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:So high participation rates for scales can be obtain.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Scales or surveys are among the measurement tools developed to measure the perceptions of individuals on specified topics. In some cases, the length of these measuring tools may negatively affect the response rates of individuals towards these tools. In this regard, this study aimed to development of short forms of scales by decision trees algorithms. In this way, it can be provided to design short-form measuring tools that perform similar functions and to increase the rate of responses to measuring tools. In the study, predictions were made with decision trees, which are data mining methods. In this context, analyzes were made with decision trees algorithms to obtain short forms of three scales. According to the results obtained, a high level of correlation was found between scales’ short and long forms. Thus, it can be concluded that short forms of scales are suitable for measuring similar purposes. Instead of using scales consisting of 40, 20 and 20 items, expected measurements can be made with at least three and 10 items with appropriate tree algorithms for each scale. Among the suggestions of the study, it is possible to carry out similar studies for frequently used scales. So high participation rates for scales can be obtain.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

AYDEMIR, E., KAYSI, F. (2022). Development of Short Forms of Scales with Decision Tree Algorithms. Balkan Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 4, 285–290. https://ajindex.com/articles/460554

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. O. D. Duncan, “Notes on social measurement: Historical and critical”, New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1984
  2. F. M., Lord, M. R. Novick, “Statistical theories of mental test scores, Charlotte, NC: Infprmation Age, 2008
  3. R. F. DeVellis, “Scale development: Theory and applications”, Sage publications, 2016
  4. B., Marcus, M., Bosnjak, S., Lindner, S., Pilischenko, & A. Schütz, “Compensating for low topic interest and long surveys: A field experiment on nonresponse in web surveys”, Social Science Computer Review, vol.25, pp.372-383, 2007
  5. P., Edwards, I. Roberts, M. Clarke, C. DiGuiseppi, S. Pratap, R. Wentz, İ. Kwan, “Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: Systematic review”, British Medical Journal, vol.324, 2002, pp.1183–1185
  6. K. Sheehan, “E-mail survey response rates: A review”, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, vol.6, 2001
  7. A. H. Church, “Estimating the effect of incentives on mail survey response rates: A meta-analysis”, Public Opinion Quarterly, vol.57, 1993, pp.62–79
  8. F. J. Yammarino, S. J. Skinner, T. L. Childers, “Understanding mail survey response behavior”, Public Opinion Quarterly, vol.55, 1991, pp.613–639
  9. G. Yetter, K. Capaccioli, “Differences in responses to Web and paper surveys among school professionals”, Behavior Research Methods, vol.42, 2010, pp.266-272
  10. D. S. Carlson, K. M. Kacmar, J. H. Wayne, & J. G. Grzywacz, “Measuring the positive side of the work–family interface: Development and validation of a work–family enrichment scale”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, vol.68, 2006, pp.131-164
  11. K. Kacmar, C. Michele, S. Wayne, D. S. Carlson, M. Ferguson, & D. Whitten, “A short and valid measure of work-family enrichment”, Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, vol.19, 2014, pp.32-45
  12. İ. D. Ülbeği, E. İplik, “İş-Aile Zenginleşmesi Ölçeğinin Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması”, Journal of Business Research-Turk, vol.10, 2018, pp.722-741
  13. M. Kwon, J. Y. Lee, W. Y. Won, J. W. Park, J. A. Min, C. Hahn, X. Gu, J. Choi, D. J. Kim, “Development and validation of a smartphone addiction scale (SAS)”, PloS one, vol.8, 2013b, e56936.
  14. M. Kwon, D. J. Kim, H. Cho, & S. Yang, “The smartphone addiction scale: development and validation of a short version for adolescents”, PloS one, vol.8, 2013a, e83558
  15. S. Sendjaya, N. Eva, I. B. Butar, M. Robin & S. Castles, “SLBS-6: Validation of a short form of the servant leadership behavio