Journals / Balkan Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering / 2020 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 4

Development of Short Forms of Scales with Decision Tree Algorithms

Pages
285–290
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results obtained, a high level of correlation was found between scales’ short and long forms.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Scales or surveys are among the measurement tools developed to measure the perceptions of individuals on specified topics.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In some cases, the length of these measuring tools may negatively affect the response rates of individuals towards these tools.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results obtained, a high level of correlation was found between scales’ short and long forms.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Scales or surveys are among the measurement tools developed to measure the perceptions of individuals on specified topics. In some cases, the length of these measuring tools may negatively affect the response rates of individuals towards these tools. In this regard, this study aimed to development of short forms of scales by decision trees algorithms. In this way, it can be provided to design short-form measuring tools that perform similar functions and to increase the rate of responses to measuring tools. In the study, predictions were made with decision trees, which are data mining methods. In this context, analyzes were made with decision trees algorithms to obtain short forms of three scales. According to the results obtained, a high level of correlation was found between scales’ short and long forms. Thus, it can be concluded that short forms of scales are suitable for measuring similar purposes. Instead of using scales consisting of 40, 20 and 20 items, expected measurements can be made with at least three and 10 items with appropriate tree algorithms for each scale. Among the suggestions of the study, it is possible to carry out similar studies for frequently used scales. So high participation rates for scales can be obtain.

🔖

Cite This Article

AYDEMIR, E., KAYSI, F. (2022). Development of Short Forms of Scales with Decision Tree Algorithms. Balkan Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 4, 285–290. https://ajindex.com/articles/460554

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. O. D. Duncan, “Notes on social measurement: Historical and critical”, New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1984
  2. F. M., Lord, M. R. Novick, “Statistical theories of mental test scores, Charlotte, NC: Infprmation Age, 2008
  3. R. F. DeVellis, “Scale development: Theory and applications”, Sage publications, 2016
  4. B., Marcus, M., Bosnjak, S., Lindner, S., Pilischenko, & A. Schütz, “Compensating for low topic interest and long surveys: A field experiment on nonresponse in web surveys”, Social Science Computer Review, vol.25, pp.372-383, 2007
  5. P., Edwards, I. Roberts, M. Clarke, C. DiGuiseppi, S. Pratap, R. Wentz, İ. Kwan, “Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: Systematic review”, British Medical Journal, vol.324, 2002, pp.1183–1185
  6. K. Sheehan, “E-mail survey response rates: A review”, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, vol.6, 2001
  7. A. H. Church, “Estimating the effect of incentives on mail survey response rates: A meta-analysis”, Public Opinion Quarterly, vol.57, 1993, pp.62–79
  8. F. J. Yammarino, S. J. Skinner, T. L. Childers, “Understanding mail survey response behavior”, Public Opinion Quarterly, vol.55, 1991, pp.613–639
  9. G. Yetter, K. Capaccioli, “Differences in responses to Web and paper surveys among school professionals”, Behavior Research Methods, vol.42, 2010, pp.266-272
  10. D. S. Carlson, K. M. Kacmar, J. H. Wayne, & J. G. Grzywacz, “Measuring the positive side of the work–family interface: Development and validation of a work–family enrichment scale”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, vol.68, 2006, pp.131-164
  11. K. Kacmar, C. Michele, S. Wayne, D. S. Carlson, M. Ferguson, & D. Whitten, “A short and valid measure of work-family enrichment”, Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, vol.19, 2014, pp.32-45
  12. İ. D. Ülbeği, E. İplik, “İş-Aile Zenginleşmesi Ölçeğinin Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması”, Journal of Business Research-Turk, vol.10, 2018, pp.722-741
  13. M. Kwon, J. Y. Lee, W. Y. Won, J. W. Park, J. A. Min, C. Hahn, X. Gu, J. Choi, D. J. Kim, “Development and validation of a smartphone addiction scale (SAS)”, PloS one, vol.8, 2013b, e56936.
  14. M. Kwon, D. J. Kim, H. Cho, & S. Yang, “The smartphone addiction scale: development and validation of a short version for adolescents”, PloS one, vol.8, 2013a, e83558
  15. S. Sendjaya, N. Eva, I. B. Butar, M. Robin & S. Castles, “SLBS-6: Validation of a short form of the servant leadership behavio