KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Alanya Akademik Bakış / 2022 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3

The Myth of the Environmental Kuznets Curve: Second Generation Panel Approach for MIST Countries

Sevginaz IŞIK
Sayfa
3199–3214
Yayın Tarihi
2022-09-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

For the entire group and individually for Indonesia and Turkey, CO2 emissions per capita rise perilously as real GDP per capita increases.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The focus of the empirical analysis in this paper is to investigate the orthodox idea of “grow first, clean next” promoted by the Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In this respect, we examined the relation between CO2 emissions and economic growth for MIST countries for the period spanning from 1971 to 2016.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:For the entire group and individually for Indonesia and Turkey, CO2 emissions per capita rise perilously as real GDP per capita increases.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2016 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:EKC · CO2 Emissions · MIST Countries

Özet

The focus of the empirical analysis in this paper is to investigate the orthodox idea of “grow first, clean next” promoted by the Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis. In this respect, we examined the relation between CO2 emissions and economic growth for MIST countries for the period spanning from 1971 to 2016. With the help of second-generation panel data techniques, we employed the PANICCA unit root test, Durbin-Hausman Panel Cointegration test, and used the AMG estimator approach. The results strongly support a monotonously increasing relationship between CO2 emissions and economic growth. For the entire group and individually for Indonesia and Turkey, CO2 emissions per capita rise perilously as real GDP per capita increases.

Abstract

The focus of the empirical analysis in this paper is to investigate the orthodox idea of “grow first, clean next” promoted by the Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis. In this respect, we examined the relation between CO2 emissions and economic growth for MIST countries for the period spanning from 1971 to 2016. With the help of second-generation panel data techniques, we employed the PANICCA unit root test, Durbin-Hausman Panel Cointegration test, and used the AMG estimator approach. The results strongly support a monotonously increasing relationship between CO2 emissions and economic growth. For the entire group and individually for Indonesia and Turkey, CO2 emissions per capita rise perilously as real GDP per capita increases.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

IŞIK, S. (2022). The Myth of the Environmental Kuznets Curve: Second Generation Panel Approach for MIST Countries. Alanya Akademik Bakış, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3, 3199–3214. https://ajindex.com/articles/456954

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. AGRAS, J., and CHAPMAN, D. (1999). “A Dynamic Approach to the Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis’’. Ecological Economics, 28(2), 267–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(98)00040-8
  2. AKBOSTANCI, E., TÜRÜT-AŞIK, S., and TUNÇ, G. I. (2009). “The Relationship Between Income and Environment in Turkey: Is There An Environmental Kuznets Curve? ’’. Energy Policy, 37(3), 861–867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.088
  3. APERGIS, N., and PAYNE, J. E. (2009). “CO2 Emissions, Energy Usage, and Output in Central America’’. Energy Policy, 37(8), 3282–3286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.03.048
  4. AZOMAHOU, T., LAISNEY, F., and NGUYEN VAN, P. (2006). “Economic Development and CO2 Emissions: A Nonparametric Panel Approach’’. Journal of Public Economics, 90(6–7), 1347–1363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2005.09.005
  5. BAI, J., and NG, S. (2004). “A Panic Attack on Unit Roots and Cointegration’’. Econometrica, 72(4), 1127–1177. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2004.00528.x
  6. BAI, J., and NG, S. (2010). “Instrumental Variable Estimation in a Data Rich Environment’’. Econometric Theory, 26, 1577-1606. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266466609990727
  7. BAKIRTAS, I., and CETIN, M. A. (2017). “Revisiting the Environmental Kuznets Curve and Pollution Haven Hypotheses: MIKTA Sample’’. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 24(22), 18273–18283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9462-y
  8. BALTAGI, B. H. (2005). Econometric Analysis of Panel Data (Third Ed.). John Wiley and Sons, Ltd. BECKERMAN, W. (1992). “Economic Growth and the Environment: Whose Growth? Whose Environment? ’’. World Development, 20(4), 481–496. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(92)90038-W
  9. BREUSCH, T. S., and PAGAN, A. R. (1980). “The Lagrange Multiplier Test and its Applications to Model Specification in Econometrics’’. Review of Economic Studies, 47(1), 239–253.
  10. CAVIGLIA-HARRIS, J. L., CHAMBERS, D., and KAHN, J. R. (2009). “Taking the “U “ out of Kuznets. A Comprehensive Analysis of the EKC and Environmental Degradation’’. Ecological Economics, 68(4), 1149–1159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.08.006
  11. CHOI, E., HESHMATI, A., and CHO, Y. (2010). “An Empirical Study of the Relationships between CO2 Emissions, Economic Growth and Openness’’. IZA Discussion Paper Series (Issue 5304). DASGUPTA, S., LAPLANTE, B., WANG, H., and WHEELER, D. (2002). “Confronting the Environmental Kuznets Curve’’. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16(1), 147–168. https://doi.org/10.2307/2696580
  12. DESTEK, M. A., and SARKO