Dergiler / Anadolu Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi :A-Uygulamalı Bilimler ve Mühendislik / 2018 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 2

INVESTIGATION OF STRONG COLUMN – WEAK BEAM RATIO IN MULTI-STOREY STRUCTURES

Sayfa
242–252
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The results of the investigation highlighted that irregularity in the strong column-weak beam compositionmay negatively affect the other irregularities in the structure.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:It is expected that the engineering constructions should carry the vertical and horizontal loads during the service within thedetermined safety margin.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:It is possible to absorb andconsume the earthquake energy via beam plastic joint hinges if the columns are constructed to be more durable than the beams.For this, it is foreseen that the ratio of the ultimate strength of the upper and lower columns to the right and left beams (β)should be greater than one (β = 1.2) in the beam-column joints as stated in the Turkish Earthquake Code.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The results of the investigation highlighted that irregularity in the strong column-weak beam compositionmay negatively affect the other irregularities in the structure.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

It is expected that the engineering constructions should carry the vertical and horizontal loads during the service within thedetermined safety margin. The basic principal of having strong column-weak beam preference is essential for earthquakeresistant structures for all construction types including concrete, steel, wood and prefabricated. The major criteria for havingearthquake resistant structure is to ensure that the columns are stronger and carry the most load than the beam in the nodes.This criterion has been widely adopted in earthquake codes in Europe, USA, Japan and India. It is possible to absorb andconsume the earthquake energy via beam plastic joint hinges if the columns are constructed to be more durable than the beams.For this, it is foreseen that the ratio of the ultimate strength of the upper and lower columns to the right and left beams (β)should be greater than one (β = 1.2) in the beam-column joints as stated in the Turkish Earthquake Code. This coefficient isusually greater than 1.2 in the earthquake codes adopted in the world. It was observed that many structures were damaged orcollapsed due to not meeting the coefficient criteria stated above. This criterion is the most effective one among many to preventthe damage in the structure under seismic action. In this study, the effect of the change in the coefficient on the column andbeam moments is investigated under the Turkish Earthquake Code. Different numerical examples are presents for thecoefficient of 10. The results of the investigation highlighted that irregularity in the strong column-weak beam compositionmay negatively affect the other irregularities in the structure.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

GÖKDEMİR, H., GÜNAYDIN, A. (2022). INVESTIGATION OF STRONG COLUMN – WEAK BEAM RATIO IN MULTI-STOREY STRUCTURES. Anadolu Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi :A-Uygulamalı Bilimler ve Mühendislik, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 2, 242–252. https://ajindex.com/articles/438219

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. TEC. Deprem Bölgelerinde Yapılacak Binalar Hakkında Yönetmelik. Bayındırlık ve İskan Bakanlığı (in Turkish), Ankara, 2007
  2. ACI Committee 318. Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete. American Concrete Institute, Detroit, MI, 2002
  3. EC8. Design Provisions for Earthquake Resistance of Structures. Pub. ENV-2003-2, Comite Europeaen 23 de Normalization, Brussels, 2003
  4. IS:1893 (Part 1). Indian Standard Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, 2007
  5. Doğan M. Yapıların Deprem Analizi, Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi, Yayın No:143, ISBN 978- 975-7936-52-7 (in Turkish), 2012
  6. FEMA 356. NEHRP Commentary on the Guidelines for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings. FEMA 356, Washington, DC., USA, (2000)
  7. Tsonos AG. Cyclic load behaviour of reinforced concrete beam-column sub assemblages of modern structures. ACI Struct J 2007; 104(4): 468-478
  8. Higazy M, Elnashai S, Agbabian S. Behaviour of beam-column connections under axial column tension. J Struct Eng 1996; 122 (5): 501-511
  9. Febres C, Wight J. Experimental study of reinforced concrete interior wide beam–column connections subjected to lateral loading. ACI Struct J 2001; 98: 572-582
  10. Murty CVR. IITK-BMTPC Earthquake Tips-Learning Earthquake Design and Construction, National Information Centre of Earthquake Engineering, NICEE, India: 2005
  11. Elnashai AS, Sarno LD. Fundamentals of Earthquake Engineering. 1st ed. New York, NY, USA: Wiley, 2008
  12. Mwafy AM, Elnashai AS. Static pushover versus dynamic collapse analysis of RC buildings. Eng Struct 2001; 23(5): 407-424
  13. SAP2000. Structural Analysis Program. CSI, Berkeley, USA.