Dergiler / Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International / 2019 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2

Adaptation of Academic Entitlement Questionnaire

Sayfa
314–351
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Thus, it canbe stated that Academic Entitlement Questionnaire is a valid and reliable instrument for measuringacademic entitlement of Turkish university students.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Academic entitlement is one of the most significant problems that affect not only students’academic success but also lead them to engage in various uncivil and undesired behaviors such asdisrespect, anger and aggression.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Academically entitled students are inconsiderate oftheir friends, intolerant to even constructive feedback, and exhibit unethical behaviors such ascheating, plagiarism, etc..
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Thus, it canbe stated that Academic Entitlement Questionnaire is a valid and reliable instrument for measuringacademic entitlement of Turkish university students.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Academic entitlement is one of the most significant problems that affect not only students’academic success but also lead them to engage in various uncivil and undesired behaviors such asdisrespect, anger and aggression. It might disrupt individuals’ psychological and social adaptationby itself or interacting with other problems. Academically entitled students are inconsiderate oftheir friends, intolerant to even constructive feedback, and exhibit unethical behaviors such ascheating, plagiarism, etc.. This global phenomenon is a significant problem in Turkey as well.Therefore, the need for having a sound grasp of academic entitlement led to initial reliability andvalidity studies of Academic Entitlement Questionnaire in Turkish Culture in this study. Analyseswere carried out on 469 participants data, 351 (75%) of whom were females and 118 (25%) ofwhom were males. It was found that Turkish and English forms were equivalent, the constructwith a-five-item unidimensional scale was confirmed. Furthermore, for concurrent validity,relationship between academic entitlement and similar structures of narcissism, entitlement andacademic self-efficacy was investigated. Results indicated that academic entitlement was found tobe significantly related to narcissism and entitlement and negatively related to academic selfefficacy. This indicates that academic entitlement despite related to these three structures is adifferent construct. For reliability, internal consistency coefficients and test-retest methods wereused. These analyses indicated that the scale assess academic entitlement consistently. Thus, it canbe stated that Academic Entitlement Questionnaire is a valid and reliable instrument for measuringacademic entitlement of Turkish university students.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KURTYILMAZ, Y. (2022). Adaptation of Academic Entitlement Questionnaire. Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2, 314–351. https://ajindex.com/articles/435919

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (6)

  1. Achacoso, M. V. (2002). “What do you mean my grade is not an A?” An investigation of academic entitlement, causal attributions, and self-regulation in college students. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global Database. (UMI No. 3225897) Akıncı, İ. (2015). The relationship between the types of narcissism and psychological wellbeing: The roles of emotions and difficulties in emotion regulation. [Narsisizm türleri ve psikolojik iyilik hali arasındaki ilişki: Duyguların ve duygu düzenleme güçlüklerinin rolü.] (Master Thesis. Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi,
  2. Ankara, Türkiye). Retrieved from http://etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12619052/index.pdf
  3. Ames, D. R., Rose, P., & Anderson, C. P. (2006). The NPI-16 as a short measure of narcissism. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(4), 440–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2005.03.002
  4. Anderson, D., Halberstadt, J., & Aitken, R. (2013). Entitlement attitudes predict students’ poor performance in challenging academic conditions. International Journal of Higher Education, 2(2), 151-158. doi:10.5430/ijhe.v2n2p151 Atay, S. (2009). Narsistik Kişilik Envanteri’nin Türkçe’ye standardizasyonu. Gazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 11(1), 181-196. Retrieved from https://scholar.google.com.tr/scholar?output=instlink&q=info:aS2DGracyxoJ:scholar.go ogle.com/&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5&scillfp=8210132015291129990&oi=lle Baranoff, J., Oei, T. P., Cho, S. H., & Kwon, S. M. (2006). Factor structure and internal consistency of the Young Schema Questionnaire (Short Form) in Korean and Australian samples. Journal of Affective Disorders, 93(1-3), 133-140. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2006.03.003 Barton, A. L., & Hirsch, J. K. (2016). Permissive parenting and mental health in college students: Mediating effects of academic entitlement. Journal of American College Health, 64(1), 1-8. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2015.1060597 Benson, J. (1998). Developing a strong program of construct validation: A test anxiety example. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 17, 10–17.
  5. Boswell, S. S. (2012). “I deserve success”: Academic entitlement attitudes and their relationships with course self-efficacy, social networking, and demographic variables. Social Psychology of Education, 15(3), 353-365. doi:10.1007/s11218-012-9184-4
  6. Campbell, W. K., Bonacci, A. M., Shelton, J., Exline, J. J., & Bushman, B. J. (2004). Psychological entitlement: Interpersonal consequences and validation of a self-report meas