KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace / 2019 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2

Reflecting on the Reflectivist Approach to Qualitative Interviewing

Alper KALİBER
Sayfa
339–357
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Finally, the concluding part introducessome works utilising interviewing in Turkish IR and wraps up the theoretical/methodological arguments disseminated throughout the study at hand.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This study aims to reflect on qualitative interviewing with a particular emphasison semi-structured interviewing (SSI), with the purpose of guiding students andyoung scholars of International Relations and Political Science who will usethis method in their research.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:This study begs to differ from both radical postpositivist’sdeep scepticism which makes any scientific inquiry almost impossibleas well as from positivism’s unreflective, unproblematized, instrumental approachto interviewing.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Finally, the concluding part introducessome works utilising interviewing in Turkish IR and wraps up the theoretical/methodological arguments disseminated throughout the study at hand.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

This study aims to reflect on qualitative interviewing with a particular emphasison semi-structured interviewing (SSI), with the purpose of guiding students andyoung scholars of International Relations and Political Science who will usethis method in their research. This study begs to differ from both radical postpositivist’sdeep scepticism which makes any scientific inquiry almost impossibleas well as from positivism’s unreflective, unproblematized, instrumental approachto interviewing. It proposes a reflectivist approach to qualitative interviewingthat emphasizes the political nature of the interviewing process with variouspolitical, ethical and even social consequences. The reflectivist approach requiresresearchers to be self-critical at all times, in particular concerning their role andinfluence on the interview setting and the interviewee. This article proceeds asfollows: It first addresses my own research on the nexus between civil societyand the Kurdish question in Turkey, where SSI has been operationalized as themain research method. It then addresses the positivist and post-positivist debateson qualitative interviewing as well as the reflectivist approach that this studypromotes. The article then engages in SSI in three distinct stages: pre-interview,interview and post-interview phases. Finally, the concluding part introducessome works utilising interviewing in Turkish IR and wraps up the theoretical/methodological arguments disseminated throughout the study at hand.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KALİBER, A. (2022). Reflecting on the Reflectivist Approach to Qualitative Interviewing. All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2, 339–357. https://ajindex.com/articles/434995

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. Alvesson, Mats. “Beyond Neopositivists, Romantics, and Localists: A Reflexive Approach to Interviews in Organizational Research.” Academy of Management Review 28, no. 1 (2003): 13–33.
  2. Alvesson, Mats. “Methodology for Close up Studies- Struggling with Closeness and Closure.” Higher Education 46 (2003): 167–93.
  3. Aydın Düzgit, Senem. “Legitimizing Europe in Contested Settings: Europe as a Normative Power in Turkey?” Journal of Common Market Studies. Accessed March 8, 2018. doi: 10.11/jcms.12647. Baker, Carolyn. “Membership Categorizations and Interview Accounts.” In Qualitative Research, edited by David. Silverman, 130–43. London: Sage, 1997.
  4. Brinkmann, Svend. Qualitative Interviewing. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
  5. Boşnak, Büke. “Europeanisation and De-Europeanisation Dynamics in Turkey: The Case of Environmental Organisations.” South European Society and Politics 21, no. 1 (2016): 75–90.
  6. Buzan, Barry, Ole Waever, and Jaap de Wilde. Security: A New Framework for Analysis. London: Lynne Rienner, 1998.
  7. Bürgin, Alexander. “Why the EU Still Matters in Turkish Domestic Politics: Insights from Recent Reforms in Migration Policy.” South European Society and Politics 21, no.1 (2016): 105–18.
  8. Caputo, John D. Radical Hermeneutics: Repetition, Deconstruction, and the Hermeneutic Project. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1987.
  9. Diefenbach, Thomas. “Are Case Studies More Than Sophisticated Storytelling?: Methodological Problems of Qualitative Empirical Research Mainly Based on Semi-structured Interviews.” Quality & Quantity 43 (2009): 875–94.
  10. Grigoriadis, Ioannis N. Trials of Europeanization: Turkish Political Culture and the European Union. UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.
  11. Irvine, Annie, Paul Drew, and Roy Sainsbury. “‘Am I Not Answering your Questions Properly?’ Clarification, Adequacy and Responsiveness in Semi-Structured Telephone and Face-to-Face Interviews.” Qualitative Research 13, no.1 (2012): 87–106.
  12. Kaliber, Alper. “De-Europeanisation of Civil Society and Public Debates in Turkey: The Kurdish Question Revisited.” South European Society and Politics 21, no. 1 (2016): 59–74.
  13. Kaliber, Alper, and Nathalie Tocci. “Conflict Society and the Transformation of Turkey’s Kurdish Question.” Security Dialogue 41, No. 2 (2010): 191–215.
  14. Keyman, E. Fuat. “Turkish Foreign Policy in the post-Arab Spring Era: From Proactive to Buffer State.” Third World Quarterly 37, no. 12 (2016): 2274–87.
  15. McLaren, Lauren M. and Meltem Müftüler Baç. “Turkish Parliament