KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace / 2019 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2

Broadening the Horizons of the “International” by Historicizing it: Comparative Historical Analysis

Mustafa Serdar PALABIYIK
Sayfa
307–325
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The article concludesthat CHA might contribute to the study of IR by enhancing interdisciplinaryapproaches and by adding a socio-historical depth to the ‘international’, whichhelps to overcome historicism and presentism at the same time.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This article intends to analyze the use of comparative historical analysis (CHA)in the discipline of International Relations (IR).
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:After describing the historicalevolution and fundamental premises of CHA, the article continues with theclassification of CHA.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The article concludesthat CHA might contribute to the study of IR by enhancing interdisciplinaryapproaches and by adding a socio-historical depth to the ‘international’, whichhelps to overcome historicism and presentism at the same time.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

This article intends to analyze the use of comparative historical analysis (CHA)in the discipline of International Relations (IR). After describing the historicalevolution and fundamental premises of CHA, the article continues with theclassification of CHA. Then the strengths and weaknesses of the method as wellas its utilization by various theories of IR are discussed. The second part of thearticle deals with the employment of CHA by the author of this article in his ownresearch design, in order to give an idea that how CHA might contribute to abetter understanding of the “international”. In doing that, the advantages anddisadvantages of the method are revisited in a way to show the contributionsprovided as well as the difficulties encountered in practice. The article concludesthat CHA might contribute to the study of IR by enhancing interdisciplinaryapproaches and by adding a socio-historical depth to the ‘international’, whichhelps to overcome historicism and presentism at the same time.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

PALABIYIK, M. S. (2022). Broadening the Horizons of the “International” by Historicizing it: Comparative Historical Analysis. All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2, 307–325. https://ajindex.com/articles/434988

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Adas, Michael. “Comparative History and Challenge of the Grand Narrative.” In A Companion to World History, edited by Douglas Northrop, 229–43. West Sussex: Blackwell Publishing Ltd., 2012.
  2. Aston, T. H., and C. H. E. Philpin, ed. The Brenner Debate: Agrarian Class Structure and Economic Development in Pre-Industrial Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.
  3. Baldwin, Peter. “Comparing and Generalizing: Why All History is Comparative, Yet No History Is Sociology.” In Comparison and History: Europe in Cross-National Perspective, edited by Deborah Cohen and Maura O’Connor, 1–22. New York and London: Routledge, 2004.
  4. Bendix, Reinhard. Work and Authority in Industry: Managerial Ideologies in the Course of Industrialization. New York: Transaction Publishers, 1963.
  5. Bloch, Marc. “Pour une histoire compare des sociétés européennes.” Revue de synthèse historique 46 (1928): 15–50.
  6. Brenner, Robert. “Agrarian Class Structure and Economic Development in Pre-Industrial Europe.” Past and Present 70 (1976): 30–75.
  7. Buzan, Barry. An Introduction to the English School of International Relations: The Societal Approach. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2014.
  8. Cohen, Deborah, and Maura O’Connor. “Introduction: Comparative History, Cross-National History, Transnational History – Definitions.” In Comparison and History: Europe in Cross-National Perspective, edited by Deborah Cohen and Maura O’Connor, ix–xxiv. New York and London: Routledge, 2004.
  9. Coulborn, Rushton. “A Paradigm for Comparative History?” Current Anthropology 10, no. 2–3 (1969): 175–78.
  10. Degler, Carl N. “Comparative History: An Essay Review.” The Journal of Southern History 34, no. 3 (1968): 425– 30. Dunne, Tim. “A British School of International Relations.” In The British Study of Politics in the Twentieth Century, edited by Jack Hayward, Brian Berry, and Archie Brown, 395–424. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
  11. Elman, Colin, and Miriam Fendius Elman. “Diplomatic History and International Relations Theory: Respecting Difference and Crossing Boundaries.” International Security 22, no. 1 (1997): 5–21.
  12. Esenbel, Selçuk. Japon Modernleşmesi ve Osmanlı: Japonya’nın Türk Dünyası ve İslam Politikaları. 2nd ed. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları, 2015.
  13. Gills, B. K. “International Relations Theory and the Processes of World History: Three Approaches.” In The Study of International Relations: The State of the Art, edited by Hugh C. Dyer and Leon Mangasarian, 103–54. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 1989.
  14. Grew, Raymond. “The Case fo