Dergiler / Journal of Eta Maritime Science / 2021 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2

Estimation of Probabilistic Seismic Hazard for Marine Structures: A Case Study for Haydarpaşa Port

Sayfa
74–84
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Unlike the old one, this new document identifies four different levels of ground motion: minimum damage level earthquake (TR=72), limited damage level earthquake (TR=144), controlling damage level earthquake (TR=475), and maximum considered earthquake (TR=2.475)

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The size and importance of maritime transportation in world trade are well known.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In 2007, the first Turkish Seismic Design Code for Port Structures was published, which introduced new design concepts in the seismic design of offshore structures.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Unlike the old one, this new document identifies four different levels of ground motion: minimum damage level earthquake (TR=72), limited damage level earthquake (TR=144), controlling damage level earthquake (TR=475), and maximum considered earthquake (TR=2.475)
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2007 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

The size and importance of maritime transportation in world trade are well known. The number of ports, which is one of the most important elements of maritime transportation, is increasing day by day not only in our country but also throughout the world. Many active fault systems in our country are located at sea. In the Marmara Region in particular, most active branches of the North Anatolian Fault system pass through the Sea of Marmara. When offshore structures such as ports are constructed in high-seismicity zones such as the Sea of Marmara, conducting site-specific seismic hazard studies is necessary to reduce the seismic risk of offshore structures. In 2007, the first Turkish Seismic Design Code for Port Structures was published, which introduced new design concepts in the seismic design of offshore structures. According to this code, the design can be finalized in three basic steps: assessment of regional seismicity, estimation of geotechnical hazards, and soil-structure interaction analysis of offshore structures. Nowadays, the first Turkish Seismic Design Code for Port Structures is on the verge of a major update, which was published as a draft report in May 2019. In this manuscript, site-specific probabilistic seismic hazard analysis is needed to determine the seismic hazard associated with typical port sites. Considering this new draft code as a guideline document, we developed consistent seismic hazard studies for offshore structures within the Haydarpaşa Port sites. Unlike the old one, this new document identifies four different levels of ground motion: minimum damage level earthquake (TR=72), limited damage level earthquake (TR=144), controlling damage level earthquake (TR=475), and maximum considered earthquake (TR=2.475)

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

MERT, A. (2021). Estimation of Probabilistic Seismic Hazard for Marine Structures: A Case Study for Haydarpaşa Port. Journal of Eta Maritime Science, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2, 74–84. https://ajindex.com/articles/413817

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. H. Tsuchida, “History of earthquake-induced damage on port facilities in Japan.” J Foundation Engineering & Equipment, vol. 315, 2-4 in Japanese, 2003
  2. Port and Harbour Research Institute, Handbook on liquefaction remediation of reclaimed land, Ports and Harbours Bureau, Tokyo: Coastal Development Institute of Technology, 1997
  3. R. Boulanger, et al. “Performance of waterfront structures,” Kocaeli, Turkey, Earthquake Reconnaissance Rep. in Chap. 13, Supplement A to Earthquake Spectra, T. L. Youd, J.-P. Bardet, and J. D. Bray Eds., İstanbul: Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi, 2000, pp. 295-310
  4. A.R. Gunbak, O. Muyesser, and Y. Yuksel, “Damages recorded at the coastal and port structures around Izmit Bay under the August 17, 1999 Earthquake.” Presented at PIANC Buenos Aires Conf., 2000. Buenos Aires, Argentina, 2000
  5. Y. Yüksel, B. Alpar, A. Yalciner, E. Cevik, O. Ozguven and Y. Celikoglu, “Effects of the Eastern Marmara Earthquake on the marine structures and coastal areas.” Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers Water and Maritime Engineering, vol. 156, pp. 147-163, Jun 2003
  6. B.M. Sumer, A. Kaya, and N.E.O. Hansen, “Impact of liquefaction on coastal structures in the 1999 Kocaeli, Turkey Earthquake.” in 12th Int. Offshore and Polar Engineering Conf., KitaKyushu: Japan, vol. 2, 2002, pp. 504-511
  7. Kıyı ve Liman Yapıları, Demiryolları ve Hava Meydanları İnşaatlarına İlişkin Deprem Teknik Yönetmeliği, Ulaştırma Bakanlığı, Ankara, Ağustos 2007
  8. M. Cubrinovski, et al. “Liquefaction-induced damage and CPT characterization of the reclamation at centreport Wellington.” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, vol 108, March 2018
  9. Ulasim ve Dagitim Tesisleri İçin Deprem Yönetmelikleri Hazirlanmasi ve Musavirlik Hizmetleri Danismanlik Hizmet Alimi İsi, Yüksel Proje, Nihai Rapora Esas Taslak Rapor (ARA RAPOR-3), Kıyı ve Liman Yapıları (Sektör: Ulaşım Tesisleri – A3) Mayis 2019
  10. The Turkish Statistical Institute, [Online] Available from:
  11. Boğaziçi University, Kandilli Observatory and Earthquake Research Institute (KOERI), Regional Earthquake and Tsunami Monitoring Center, [Online] Available from:www.koeri.boun. edu.tr
  12. R. Armijo, B. Meyer, A. Hubert and A. Barka, “Westward propagation of the North Anatolian fault into the northern Aegean: timing and kinematics,” Geology, vol. 27, pp. 267-270, April 2016
  13. A.C. Yalciner, et al. “Evaluation of tsunami scenario for western Peloponnese,