Dergiler / Turkish Neurosurgery / 2020 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 4

A New Practical Intracerebral Hematoma Volume Calculation Method and Comparison to simple ABC/2

Sayfa
520–526
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The proposed method calculates the subdural hematoma volumes muchbetter than the conventional one, and the root mean square error (RMSE) values were 32.17 and 20.62 ml for sABC/2 and our newmethod, respectively, whereas the RMSE values for parenchymal hematomas were 25.01 and 20.46 ml for sABC/2 and our newmethod, respectively.CONCLUSION: Our new formula for calculating the volume of subdural and parenchymal hematomas is as practical as sABC/2 andallows the clinician to apply the method bedside.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:AIM: To find a more practical and effective formula than simple ABC/2 (sABC/2) to calculate the hematoma volume in patients withsubdural and parenchymal haemorrhage.MATERIAL and METHODS: We reviewed the records of 157 patients who underwent brain computed tomography examinationsfor stroke from January to October 2017.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Our method, sABC/2 formula, and the planimetric method (the gold standard) were usedfor measuring the volumes of hematoma.RESULTS: The concordance in brain hematoma volumes calculated by sABC/2 and the proposed method as compared toplanimetry were 0.92 and 0.93, respectively (p<0.05).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The proposed method calculates the subdural hematoma volumes muchbetter than the conventional one, and the root mean square error (RMSE) values were 32.17 and 20.62 ml for sABC/2 and our newmethod, respectively, whereas the RMSE values for parenchymal hematomas were 25.01 and 20.46 ml for sABC/2 and our newmethod, respectively.CONCLUSION: Our new formula for calculating the volume of subdural and parenchymal hematomas is as practical as sABC/2 andallows the clinician to apply the method bedside.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:2017 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

AIM: To find a more practical and effective formula than simple ABC/2 (sABC/2) to calculate the hematoma volume in patients withsubdural and parenchymal haemorrhage.MATERIAL and METHODS: We reviewed the records of 157 patients who underwent brain computed tomography examinationsfor stroke from January to October 2017. Our method, sABC/2 formula, and the planimetric method (the gold standard) were usedfor measuring the volumes of hematoma.RESULTS: The concordance in brain hematoma volumes calculated by sABC/2 and the proposed method as compared toplanimetry were 0.92 and 0.93, respectively (p<0.05). The proposed method calculates the subdural hematoma volumes muchbetter than the conventional one, and the root mean square error (RMSE) values were 32.17 and 20.62 ml for sABC/2 and our newmethod, respectively, whereas the RMSE values for parenchymal hematomas were 25.01 and 20.46 ml for sABC/2 and our newmethod, respectively.CONCLUSION: Our new formula for calculating the volume of subdural and parenchymal hematomas is as practical as sABC/2 andallows the clinician to apply the method bedside.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

CÜCE, F., TULUM, G., DANDİN, Ö., ERGIN, T., KARADAŞ, Ö., OSMAN, O. (2020). A New Practical Intracerebral Hematoma Volume Calculation Method and Comparison to simple ABC/2. Turkish Neurosurgery, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 4, 520–526. https://ajindex.com/articles/404311

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (1)

  1. Cuce F, Dandin O, Teomete U, Osman O, Ergin T, Tulum G, Aydin OU: Semi-automated calculation of intracranial haematoma volume with a new method. Injury 47(6):1361- 1363, 2016 2. Divani AA, Majidi S, Luo X, Souslian FG, Zhang J, Abosch A, Tummala RP: The ABCs of accurate volumetric measurement of cerebral hematoma. Stroke 42:1569-1574, 2011 3. Freeman WD, Barrett KM, Bestic JM, Meschia JF, Broderick DF, Brott TG: Computer-assisted volumetric analysis compared with ABC/2 method for assessing warfarin-related intracranial hemorrhage volumes. Neurocrit Care 9:307-312, 2008 4. Gebel JM, Sila CA, Sloan MA, Granger CB, Weisenberger JP, Green CL, Topol EJ, Mahaffey KW: Comparison of the ABC/2 estimation technique to computer-assisted volumetric analysis of intraparenchymal and subdural hematomas complicating the GUSTO-1 trial. Stroke 29:1799-1801, 1998 5. Hemphill JC, Bonovich DC, Besmertis L, Manley GT, Johnston SC: The ICH score: A simple, reliable grading scale for intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke 32:891-897, 2001 6. Hussein HM, Tariq NA, Palesch YY, Qureshi AI; ATACH Investigators: ATACH investigators. Reliability of hematoma volume measurement at local sites in a multicenter acute intracerebral hemorrhage clinical trial. Stroke 44:237-239, 2013 7. Huttner HB, Steiner T, Hartmann M, Köhrmann M, Juettler E, Mueller S, Wikner J, Meyding-Lamade U, Schramm P, Schwab S, Schellinger PD: Comparison of ABC/2 estimation technique to computer-assisted planimetric analysis in warfarin-related intracerebral parenchymal hemorrhage. Stroke 37:404–408, 2006 8. Khan M, Baird GL, Elias R, Rodriguez-Srednicki J, Yaghi S, Yan S, Collins S, Thompson BB, Wendell LC, Potter NS, Fehnel C, Saad A, Silver B: Comparison of intracerebral hemorrhage volume calculation methods and their impact on scoring tools. J Neuroimaging 27:144-148, 2017 9. Kothari RU, Brott T, Broderick JP, Barsan WG, Sauerbeck LR, Zuccarello M, Khoury J: The ABCs of measuring intracerebral hemorrhage volumes. Stroke 27:1304–1305, 1996 10. Maeda AK, Aguiar LR, Martins C, Bichinho GL, Gariba MA: Hematoma volumes of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: The ellipse (ABC/2) method yielded volumes smaller than those measured using the planimetric method. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 71:540-544, 2013 11. Morgan T, Zuccarello M, Narayan R, Keyl P, Lane K, Hanley D: Preliminary findings of the minimally-invasive surgery plus rtPA for intracerebral hemorrhage evacuation (MISTIE) clinical trial. Acta Neurochir Suppl 105:147-151, 20