Journals / Turkish Neurosurgery / 2020 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 4

A New Practical Intracerebral Hematoma Volume Calculation Method and Comparison to simple ABC/2

Pages
520–526
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The proposed method calculates the subdural hematoma volumes muchbetter than the conventional one, and the root mean square error (RMSE) values were 32.17 and 20.62 ml for sABC/2 and our newmethod, respectively, whereas the RMSE values for parenchymal hematomas were 25.01 and 20.46 ml for sABC/2 and our newmethod, respectively.CONCLUSION: Our new formula for calculating the volume of subdural and parenchymal hematomas is as practical as sABC/2 andallows the clinician to apply the method bedside.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:AIM: To find a more practical and effective formula than simple ABC/2 (sABC/2) to calculate the hematoma volume in patients withsubdural and parenchymal haemorrhage.MATERIAL and METHODS: We reviewed the records of 157 patients who underwent brain computed tomography examinationsfor stroke from January to October 2017.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Our method, sABC/2 formula, and the planimetric method (the gold standard) were usedfor measuring the volumes of hematoma.RESULTS: The concordance in brain hematoma volumes calculated by sABC/2 and the proposed method as compared toplanimetry were 0.92 and 0.93, respectively (p<0.05).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The proposed method calculates the subdural hematoma volumes muchbetter than the conventional one, and the root mean square error (RMSE) values were 32.17 and 20.62 ml for sABC/2 and our newmethod, respectively, whereas the RMSE values for parenchymal hematomas were 25.01 and 20.46 ml for sABC/2 and our newmethod, respectively.CONCLUSION: Our new formula for calculating the volume of subdural and parenchymal hematomas is as practical as sABC/2 andallows the clinician to apply the method bedside.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

AIM: To find a more practical and effective formula than simple ABC/2 (sABC/2) to calculate the hematoma volume in patients withsubdural and parenchymal haemorrhage.MATERIAL and METHODS: We reviewed the records of 157 patients who underwent brain computed tomography examinationsfor stroke from January to October 2017. Our method, sABC/2 formula, and the planimetric method (the gold standard) were usedfor measuring the volumes of hematoma.RESULTS: The concordance in brain hematoma volumes calculated by sABC/2 and the proposed method as compared toplanimetry were 0.92 and 0.93, respectively (p<0.05). The proposed method calculates the subdural hematoma volumes muchbetter than the conventional one, and the root mean square error (RMSE) values were 32.17 and 20.62 ml for sABC/2 and our newmethod, respectively, whereas the RMSE values for parenchymal hematomas were 25.01 and 20.46 ml for sABC/2 and our newmethod, respectively.CONCLUSION: Our new formula for calculating the volume of subdural and parenchymal hematomas is as practical as sABC/2 andallows the clinician to apply the method bedside.

🔖

Cite This Article

CÜCE, F., TULUM, G., DANDİN, Ö., ERGIN, T., KARADAŞ, Ö., OSMAN, O. (2020). A New Practical Intracerebral Hematoma Volume Calculation Method and Comparison to simple ABC/2. Turkish Neurosurgery, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 4, 520–526. https://ajindex.com/articles/404311

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Cuce F, Dandin O, Teomete U, Osman O, Ergin T, Tulum G, Aydin OU: Semi-automated calculation of intracranial haematoma volume with a new method. Injury 47(6):1361- 1363, 2016 2. Divani AA, Majidi S, Luo X, Souslian FG, Zhang J, Abosch A, Tummala RP: The ABCs of accurate volumetric measurement of cerebral hematoma. Stroke 42:1569-1574, 2011 3. Freeman WD, Barrett KM, Bestic JM, Meschia JF, Broderick DF, Brott TG: Computer-assisted volumetric analysis compared with ABC/2 method for assessing warfarin-related intracranial hemorrhage volumes. Neurocrit Care 9:307-312, 2008 4. Gebel JM, Sila CA, Sloan MA, Granger CB, Weisenberger JP, Green CL, Topol EJ, Mahaffey KW: Comparison of the ABC/2 estimation technique to computer-assisted volumetric analysis of intraparenchymal and subdural hematomas complicating the GUSTO-1 trial. Stroke 29:1799-1801, 1998 5. Hemphill JC, Bonovich DC, Besmertis L, Manley GT, Johnston SC: The ICH score: A simple, reliable grading scale for intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke 32:891-897, 2001 6. Hussein HM, Tariq NA, Palesch YY, Qureshi AI; ATACH Investigators: ATACH investigators. Reliability of hematoma volume measurement at local sites in a multicenter acute intracerebral hemorrhage clinical trial. Stroke 44:237-239, 2013 7. Huttner HB, Steiner T, Hartmann M, Köhrmann M, Juettler E, Mueller S, Wikner J, Meyding-Lamade U, Schramm P, Schwab S, Schellinger PD: Comparison of ABC/2 estimation technique to computer-assisted planimetric analysis in warfarin-related intracerebral parenchymal hemorrhage. Stroke 37:404–408, 2006 8. Khan M, Baird GL, Elias R, Rodriguez-Srednicki J, Yaghi S, Yan S, Collins S, Thompson BB, Wendell LC, Potter NS, Fehnel C, Saad A, Silver B: Comparison of intracerebral hemorrhage volume calculation methods and their impact on scoring tools. J Neuroimaging 27:144-148, 2017 9. Kothari RU, Brott T, Broderick JP, Barsan WG, Sauerbeck LR, Zuccarello M, Khoury J: The ABCs of measuring intracerebral hemorrhage volumes. Stroke 27:1304–1305, 1996 10. Maeda AK, Aguiar LR, Martins C, Bichinho GL, Gariba MA: Hematoma volumes of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: The ellipse (ABC/2) method yielded volumes smaller than those measured using the planimetric method. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 71:540-544, 2013 11. Morgan T, Zuccarello M, Narayan R, Keyl P, Lane K, Hanley D: Preliminary findings of the minimally-invasive surgery plus rtPA for intracerebral hemorrhage evacuation (MISTIE) clinical trial. Acta Neurochir Suppl 105:147-151, 20