KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Orthodontics / 2017 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 4

Camouflage Treatment of a Severe Deep-Bite and Orthognathic Surgery Required Case with En Masse Retraction

ZEYNEP ÇOBAN BÜYÜKBAYRAKTAR
ERCAN CENK DORUK
Hasan CAMCI
Sayfa
126–131
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Acceptable esthetic and functional results were obtained at the end of the treatment.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In adult patients with severe class II division 2 malocclusion, the ideal treatment option is the orthognathic surgery.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In this case report, the camouflage treatment with two maxillary premolar extractions in a 21-year-old female patient who did not accept orthognathic surgery is presented.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Acceptable esthetic and functional results were obtained at the end of the treatment.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

In adult patients with severe class II division 2 malocclusion, the ideal treatment option is the orthognathic surgery. However, camouflage therapy is also an acceptable treatment option due to its less traumatic and acceptable esthetic and functional results. In this case report, the camouflage treatment with two maxillary premolar extractions in a 21-year-old female patient who did not accept orthognathic surgery is presented. Acceptable esthetic and functional results were obtained at the end of the treatment.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

BÜYÜKBAYRAKTAR, Z. Ç., DORUK, E. C., CAMCI, H. (2017). Camouflage Treatment of a Severe Deep-Bite and Orthognathic Surgery Required Case with En Masse Retraction. Turkish Journal of Orthodontics, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 4, 126–131. https://ajindex.com/articles/375099

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (7)

  1. Acar Güngör A. Molar distalization in the treatment of class II malocclusions. EÜ Dişhek Fak Derg 2006; 27: 97-105. Sarver DM. Esthetic Orthodontics and Orthognathic Surgery. St. Louis; Mosby Inc: 1998; 2-7.
  2. Kuhlberg AJ, Glynn E. Treatment planning considerations for adult patients. Dent Clin North Am 1997; 41: 17-27.
  3. Kubein-Meesenburg D, Ihlow D. The problems of borderline cases: an aid for the analysis of orthodontic therapies. J Orofac Orthop 2006; 67: 207-14. [CrossRef] Ackerman JL, Proffit WR. Soft tissue limitations in orthodontics: treatment planning guidelines. Angle Orthod 1997; 67: 327-36.
  4. Ruf S, Pancherz H. Orthognathic surgery and dentofacial orthopedics in adult Class II Division 1 treatment: mandibular sagittal split osteotomy versus Herbst appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004; 126: 140-52. [CrossRef] Bell R, Kiyak HA, Joondeph DR, McNeill RW, Wallen TR. Perceptions of facial profile and their influence on the decision to undergo orthognathic surgery. Am J Orthod 1985; 88: 323-32. [CrossRef] Mihalik CA, Proffit WR, Phillips C. Long-term follow-up of Class II adults treated with orthodontic camouflage: a comparison with orthognathic surgery outcomes. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003; 123: 266-78. [CrossRef] Upadhyay M, Yadav S, Nagaraj K, Nanda R. Dentoskeletal and soft tissue effects of mini-implants in class II division 1 patients. Angle Orthod. 2008; 79: 240247. Bishara SE, Cummins DM, Jakobsen JR, Zaher AR Dentofacial and soft tissue changes in class II, Division 1 cases treated with and without extractions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995; 107: 28-37. [CrossRef] Proffit WR, Fields H. The biologic basis of orthodontic therapy. Contemporary orthodontics, 4, 2000.
  5. Xu TM, Zang X, Oh HS, Boyd RL, Korn EL, Baumrind S. Randomized clinical trial comparing control of maxillary anchorage with 2 retraction techniques. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010; 138: 544.e1-9; discussion 544-5.
  6. Park HS, Kwon TG. Sliding mechanics with microscrew implant anchorage. Angle Orthod 2004; 74: 703-10.
  7. Qamruddin I, Shahid F, Alam MK, Zehra Jamal W. Camouflage of Severe Skeletal Class II Gummy Smile Patient Treated Nonsurgically with Mini Implants. Case Rep Dent 2014; 2014: 382367. [CrossRef] Badri T, Pavithranand A, Rajasigamani K, Kyung HM. Comparison and measurement of the amount of anchorage loss of the molars with and without the use of implant anchorage during canine retraction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006; 129: 551-54. [CrossRef]