Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Orthodontics / 2022 / Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 2

Mechanical Vibration and Chewing Gum Methods in Orthodontic Pain Relief

Sayfa
133–138
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusion: Although the average pain values were perceived as lower, particularly in the mechanical vibration group, the temporary displacement of the teeth has no clinically significant pain relief effect on orthodontic pain.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the pain relief effects of chewing gum and mechanical vibration methods on orthodontic pain caused by the initial archwire.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Methods: In this study, 57 patients, having a 3-6 mm maxillary dental crowding and non-extraction treatment modality were included.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusion: Although the average pain values were perceived as lower, particularly in the mechanical vibration group, the temporary displacement of the teeth has no clinically significant pain relief effect on orthodontic pain.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the pain relief effects of chewing gum and mechanical vibration methods on orthodontic pain caused by the initial archwire. Methods: In this study, 57 patients, having a 3-6 mm maxillary dental crowding and non-extraction treatment modality were included. The pressure pain thresholds of the subjects were measured. Patients were distributed equally by sex and randomly allocated into 3 groups: mechanical vibration, chewing gum, and control. The fixed orthodontic treatment was started in the upper jaw only. In the first and second groups, mechanical vibration was applied and sugar-free gum was chewed, respectively. The third group was used as the control. The pain perceptions were measured using the Visual Analog Scale. Kruskal–Wallis and Friedman tests were used for statistical analysis. Results: The groups were similar at the beginning of the study in terms of age and algometer scores (P = .138 and P =.155, respectively). Statistical significant differences in the Visual Analog Scale scores among the groups could not be detected at any time point. The highest pain scores were detected at the 24th hour of treatment in all 3 groups. There was no statistically significant difference in the highest pain level among the groups (P = .279). Conclusion: Although the average pain values were perceived as lower, particularly in the mechanical vibration group, the temporary displacement of the teeth has no clinically significant pain relief effect on orthodontic pain.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÇELEBİ, F. (2022). Mechanical Vibration and Chewing Gum Methods in Orthodontic Pain Relief. Turkish Journal of Orthodontics, Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 2, 133–138. https://ajindex.com/articles/613061

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. Erdinç AM, Dinçer B. Perception of pain during orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances. Eur J Orthod. 2004
  2. 26(1):79-85. [CrossRef] 2. Bergius M, Berggren U, Kiliaridis S. Experience of pain during an orthodontic procedure. Eur J Oral Sci. 2002
  3. 110(2):92-98. [CrossRef] 3. O’Connor PJ. Patients’ perceptions before, during, and after orthodontic treatment. J Clin Orthod. 2000
  4. 34(10):591-592. 4. Aksoy A, Cesur MG, Dağdeviren BH, Özkaynak YA, Karacin G, Gültekin F. Assessment of pain, anxiety, and cortisol levels during the initial aligning phase of fixed orthodontic treatment. Turk J Orthod. 2019
  5. 32(1):34-40. [CrossRef] 5. Scribante A, Gallo S, Celmare RL, et al. Orthodontic debonding and tooth sensitivity of anterior and posterior teeth. Angle Orthod. 2020
  6. 90(6):766-773. [CrossRef] 6. Krishnan V. Orthodontic pain: from causes to management—a review. Eur J Orthod. 2007
  7. 29(2):170-179. [CrossRef] 7. Bergius M, Kiliaridis S, Berggren U. Pain in orthodontics: a review and discussion of the literature. J Orofac Orthop. 2000
  8. 61(2):125- 137. [CrossRef] 8. Polat O, Karaman AI. Pain control during fixed orthodontic appliance therapy. Angle Orthod. 2005
  9. 75(2):214-219. [CrossRef] 9. Bernhardt MK, Southard KA, Batterson KD, Logan HL, Baker KA, Jakobsen JR. The effect of preemptive and⁄or postoperative ibuprofen therapy for orthodontic pain. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001
  10. 120(1):20-27. [CrossRef] 10. Polat O, Karaman AI, Durmus E. Effects of preoperative ibuprofen and naproxen sodium on orthodontic pain. Angle Orthod. 2005
  11. 75(5):791-796. [CrossRef] 11. Marie SS, Powers M, Sheridan JJ. Vibratory stimulation as a method of reducing pain after orthodontic appliance adjustment. J Clin Orthod. 2003
  12. 37(4):205-208. 12. Farzanegan F, Zebarjad SM, Alizadeh S, Ahrari F. Pain reduction after initial archwire placement in orthodontic patients: A randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012
  13. 141(2):169-173. [CrossRef] 13. Murdock S, Phillips C, Khondker Z, Hershey HG. Treatment of pain after initial archwire placement: a noninferiority randomized clinical trial comparing over-the-counter analgesics and bite-wafer use. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010
  14. 137(3):316-323. [CrossRef] 14. Miles P, Smith H, Weyant R, Rinchuse DJ. The effects of a vibrational appliance on tooth movement and patient discomfort: a prospective randomised clinical trial. Aust Orthod J. 2012
  15. 28(2):213-218. 15. Woodhouse NR, DiBiase AT, Papageorgiou SN, et al. Supplemental vibrationa