Evaluation of the Relationship between Curve of Spee, WALA-FA Distance and Curve of Wilson in Normal Occlusion

Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: To test the hypotheses that (i) there is a significant correlation between the curve of Spee (COS), basal arch (WALA ridge) to dental arch distance (WALA-FA distance) and curve of Wilson (CW) and that (ii) the deepening of the COS is affected by the CW and the WALA-FA distance.

📊

Temel Bulgular & Veri:Methods: Mandibular models of 50 patients aged between 20 and 35 years were scanned with TRIOS.

💡

Sonuç & Katkı:The CW and WALA-FA distance could not be effective in the deepening of the COS

🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon

📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem

⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objective: To test the hypotheses that (i) there is a significant correlation between the curve of Spee (COS), basal arch (WALA ridge) to dental arch distance (WALA-FA distance) and curve of Wilson (CW) and that (ii) the deepening of the COS is affected by the CW and the WALA-FA distance. Methods: Mandibular models of 50 patients aged between 20 and 35 years were scanned with TRIOS. The xyz coordinate system was determined, and a reference occlusal plane was generated. The depth of the COS, the CW, and WALA-FA distance were measured using an engineering software. Results: The greatest difference in the measurement of the depth of the COS between the right and left was found to be 0.41±0.50 mm in the first molar teeth. On the basis of the results of Pearson correlation analysis, there was no strong correlation between the depth of the COS, the CW, and the WALA-FA distance. Conclusion: It was shown that there was no strong correlation between the depth of COS, CW, and WALA-FA distance. The CW and WALA-FA distance could not be effective in the deepening of the COS

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

DİNDAROĞLU, F., DURAN, G. S., TEKELİ, A., GÖRGÜLÜ, S., DOĞAN, S. (2016). Evaluation of the Relationship between Curve of Spee, WALA-FA Distance and Curve of Wilson in Normal Occlusion. Turkish Journal of Orthodontics, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 4, 91–97. https://ajindex.com/articles/375036

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

Yeni Sekmede Aç ↗

↗Yeni Sekme

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (1)

Little RM, Wallen TR, Riedel RA. Stability and relapse of mandibular anterior alignment-first premolar extraction cases treated by traditional edgewise orthodontics. Am J Orthod 1981; 80: 349-65. [CrossRef] 2. Raberin M, Laumon B, Martin JL, Brunner F. Dimensions and form of dental arches in subjects with normal occlusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993; 104: 67-72. [CrossRef] 3. Andrews LF. The 6-elements orthodontic philosophy: Treatment goals, classification, and rules for treating. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2015; 148: 883-7. [CrossRef] 4. Lundstrom AF. Malocclusion of the teeth regarded as a problem in connection with the apical base. Int J Orthod Oral Surg 1925; 11: 591-612. 5. Kim KY, Bayome M, Kim K, Han SH, Kim Y, Baek SH, et al. Three-dimensional evaluation of the relationship between dental and basal arch forms in normal occlusion. Korean J Orthod 2011; 41: 288-96. [CrossRef] 6. Shu R, Han X, Wang Y, Xu H, Ai D, Wang L, et al. Comparison of arch width, alveolar width and buccolingual inclination of teeth between Class II division 1 malocclusion and Class I occlusion. Angle Orthod 2012; 83: 246-252. [CrossRef] 7. Gupta D, Miner RM, Arai K, Will LA. Comparison of the mandibular dental and basal arch forms in adults and children with Class I and Class II malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010; 138: 10.e11-18; discussion 10-11. 8. Zou W, Jiang J, Xu T, Wu J. Relationship between mandibular dental and basal bone arch forms for severe skeletal Class III patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2015; 147: 37-44. [CrossRef] 9. Barrera JM, Llamas JM, Espinar E, Sáenz-Ramírez C, Paredes V, Pérez-Varela JC. Wilson maxillary curve analyzed by CBCT. A study on normocclusion and malocclusion individuals. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2013; 18: e547-52. [CrossRef] 10. Andrews LF. The six keys to normal occlusion. Am J Orthod 1972; 62: 296-309. [CrossRef] 11. The gliding path of the mandible along the skull. Ferdinand Graf Spee (1855-1937), prosector at the Anatomy Institute of Kiel. J Am Dent Assoc 1980; 100: 670-5. 12. Osborn JW. Orientation of the masseter muscle and the curve of Spee in relation to crushing forces on the molar teeth of primates. Am J Phys Anthropol 1993; 92: 99-106. [CrossRef] 13. Farella M, Michelotti A, van Eijden TM, Martina R. The curve of Spee and craniofacial morphology: a multiple regression analysis. Eur J Oral Sci 2002; 110: 277-81. [CrossRef] 14. Marshall SD, Caspersen M, Hardinger RR, Franciscus RG, Aquil