Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Orthodontics / 2015 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 4

Inconsistency between ANB Angle and Wits Appraisal in the Turkish Population

Sayfa
103–108
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

In Model 3, inclination of the occlusal plane (OP-SN⁰) (OR=1.07, p=0.02) was the independent predictor of the inconsistency.Conclusion: An increase in SN-MP⁰ and OP-SN⁰ are effective in the development of inconsistency between the ANB and Wits appraisals in the Turkish population

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the cephalometric parameters that impair the consistency between the Wits and ANB measurements, which are used in the determination of anteroposterior jaw relationships by logistic regression analysis in the Turkish population.Methods: This retrospective study was conducted on 207 lateral cephalometric radiographs of 100 females (mean age: 15.5±1.09 years; age range: 14.2–17.3 years) and 107 males (mean age: 15.1±0.93 years; age range: 14.1–16.9 years) obtained from the archives of the orthodontic department.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The cephalometric parameters that cause the inconsistency were determined using a logistic regression method with the creation of three different regression models.Results: We found posterior rotation of the mandible (SN-MP⁰) (OR=1.09; p=0.029) as an independent predictor of the inconsistency in Model 1.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:In Model 3, inclination of the occlusal plane (OP-SN⁰) (OR=1.07, p=0.02) was the independent predictor of the inconsistency.Conclusion: An increase in SN-MP⁰ and OP-SN⁰ are effective in the development of inconsistency between the ANB and Wits appraisals in the Turkish population
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the cephalometric parameters that impair the consistency between the Wits and ANB measurements, which are used in the determination of anteroposterior jaw relationships by logistic regression analysis in the Turkish population.Methods: This retrospective study was conducted on 207 lateral cephalometric radiographs of 100 females (mean age: 15.5±1.09 years; age range: 14.2–17.3 years) and 107 males (mean age: 15.1±0.93 years; age range: 14.1–16.9 years) obtained from the archives of the orthodontic department. Lateral cephalometric radiographs were divided into two groups according to the presence of inconsistency between the ANB angle and Wits appraisal. The cephalometric parameters that cause the inconsistency were determined using a logistic regression method with the creation of three different regression models.Results: We found posterior rotation of the mandible (SN-MP⁰) (OR=1.09; p=0.029) as an independent predictor of the inconsistency in Model 1. In Model 2, SN-MP⁰ (OR=1.11; p=0.016) was also found to be effective on the development of the inconsistency. In Model 3, inclination of the occlusal plane (OP-SN⁰) (OR=1.07, p=0.02) was the independent predictor of the inconsistency.Conclusion: An increase in SN-MP⁰ and OP-SN⁰ are effective in the development of inconsistency between the ANB and Wits appraisals in the Turkish population

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

DURAN, G. S., DİNDAROĞLU, F., GÖRGÜLÜ, S., KILIÇ, S. (2015). Inconsistency between ANB Angle and Wits Appraisal in the Turkish Population. Turkish Journal of Orthodontics, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 4, 103–108. https://ajindex.com/articles/375043

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (2)

  1. Ackerman JL, Proffit WR, Sarver DM. The emerging soft tissue paradigm in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Clin Orthod Res 1999; 2: 49-52
  2. Downs WB. The role of cephalometrics in orthodontic case analysis and diagnosis. Am J Orthod 1952; 38: 162-82. [CrossRef] 3. Steiner C. The use of cephalometrics as an aid to planning and assessing orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod 1960; 46: 721-35. [CrossRef] 4. Jr MNJ. A method of cephalometric evaluation. Am J Orthod 1984; 86: 449-68. [CrossRef] 5. Jacobson A. The “Wits” appraisal of jaw disharmony. Am J Orthod 1975; 67: 125-38. [CrossRef] 6. Brown M. Eight methods of analysing a cephalogram to establish anteroposterior skeletal discrepancy. Br J Orthod 1981; 8: 139-46. [CrossRef] 7. Hussels W, Nanda RS. Analysis of factors affecting angle ANB. Am J Orthod 1984; 85: 411-23. [CrossRef] 8. Chang HP. Assessment of anteroposterior jaw relationship. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1987; 92: 117-22. [CrossRef] 9. Bishara SE, Fahl JA, Peterson LC. Longitudinal changes in the ANB angle and Wits appraisal: clinical implications. Am J Orthod 1983; 84: 133-9. [CrossRef] 10. Rotberg S, Fried N, Kane J, Shapiro E. Predicting the “Wits” appraisal from the ANB angle. Am J Orthod 1980; 77: 636-42. [CrossRef] 11. Järvinen S. Relation of the Wits appraisal to the ANB angle: a statistical appraisal. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1988; 94: 432-5. [CrossRef] 12. Hurmerinta K, Rahkamo A, Haavikko K. Comparison between cephalometric classification methods for sagittal jaw relationships. Eur J Oral Sci 1997; 105: 221-7. [CrossRef] 13. Basciftci FA, Uysal T, Buyukerkmen A. Craniofacial structure of Anatolian Turkish adults with normal occlusions and well-balanced faces. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004; 125: 366-72. [CrossRef] 14. Gazilerli Ü. Wits ölçümü. Turkish J Orthod 1991; 9: 56-62. [CrossRef] 15. Nanda RS. Growth changes in skeletal-facial profile and their significance in orthodontic diagnosis. Am J Orthod 1971; 59: 501-13. [CrossRef] 16. Jacobson A. Application of the “Wits” appraisal. Am J Orthod 1976; 70: 179-89. [CrossRef] 17. Richardson M. Measurement of dental base relationship. Eur J Orthod 1982; 4: 251-6. [CrossRef] 18. Fushima K, Kitamura Y, Mita H, Sato S, Suzuki Y, Kim YH. Significance of the cant of the posterior occlusal plane in class II division 1 malocclusions. Eur J Orthod 1996; 18: 27-40. [CrossRef] 19. Hwang HS, Kim WS, McNamara JA. Ethnic differences in the soft tissue profile of Korean and E