Dergiler / The European Research Journal / 2020 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2

Prevalence of joint hypermobility, hypermobility spectrum disorder and hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome in a university population: an observational study

Sayfa
120–129
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Awareness of the prevalence of joint hypermobility, hypermobility spectrum disorders and hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome in healthy young population may contribute prevention of disability.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objectives: To investigate the prevalence of joint hypermobility classes, hypermobility spectrum disorders, hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome and their relations with sex ina university population.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Methods: Three hundred and thirty-five students met the inclusion criteria (university students who are not disabled, without known disease, aged 18-25 years).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Awareness of the prevalence of joint hypermobility, hypermobility spectrum disorders and hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome in healthy young population may contribute prevention of disability.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2017 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Joint laxity · musculoskeletal complications · chronic pain

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the prevalence of joint hypermobility classes, hypermobility spectrum disorders, hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome and their relations with sex ina university population. They are notable topics in rehabilitation, since they represents the basis for some secondary disability conditions. Methods: Three hundred and thirty-five students met the inclusion criteria (university students who are not disabled, without known disease, aged 18-25 years). Joint hypermobility were classified as generalized, peripheral and localized asymptomatic or hypermobility spectrum disorders. Hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome was defined according to; 1) Brighton criteria with cut-off Beighton scoring ≥ 4/9, 2) Villefranche criteria with cut-off Beighton scoring ≥ 5/9, and 3) The 2017 International Classification of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. Results: In total, 77.3% (n = 259) of participants had any class of joint hypermobility and 25.9% (n=87) of them had generalized class. Asymptomatic joint hypermobility and hypermobility spectrum disorders prevalence in a university population were found to be 38.8% and 38.5%, respectively. Generalized, peripheral, localized asymptomatic joint hypermobility and hypermobility spectrum disorders were found; 13.1%, 4.2%, 21.5%, and 12.8%, 7.5%, 18.2%, respectively. Prevalence of hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome according to three classifications were found to be; 19.4%, 15.2%, and 1.2%, respectively. Conclusions: The most common classes are localized asymptomatic joint hypermobility in women and localized hypermobility spectrum disorders in men. Awareness of the prevalence of joint hypermobility, hypermobility spectrum disorders and hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome in healthy young population may contribute prevention of disability.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

TUNA, F. (2020). Prevalence of joint hypermobility, hypermobility spectrum disorder and hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome in a university population: an observational study. The European Research Journal, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2, 120–129. https://ajindex.com/articles/361003

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Beighton P, Solomon L, Soskolne C. Articular mobility in an African population. Ann Rheum Dis 1973;32:413-8
  2. Simmonds JV, Herbland A, Hakim A, Ninis N, Lever W, Aziz Q, et al. Exercise beliefs and behaviours of individuals with Joint Hypermobility syndrome/Ehlers-Danlos syndrome-hypermobility type. Disabil Rehabil 2019;41:445-55
  3. Krahe AM, Adams RD, Nicholson LL. Features that exacerbate fatigue severity in joint hypermobility syndrome/Ehlers-Danlos syndrome-hypermobility type. Disabil Rehabil 2018;40:1989-96
  4. Malfait F, Francomano C, Byers P, Belmont J, Berglund B, Black J,et al. The 2017 international classification of the Ehlers-Danlos syndromes. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 2017;175:8-26
  5. Bovet C, Carlson M, Taylor M. Quality of life, unmet needs, and iatrogenic injuries in rehabilitation of patients with Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome hypermobility type/Joint Hypermobility Syndrome. Am J Med Genet A 2016;170:2044-51
  6. Gerwin RD. Benign joint hypermobility is not benign. Myopain 2015;23:11-2
  7. Fikree A, Aktar R, Morris JK, Grahame R, Knowles CH, Aziz Q. The association between Ehlers-Danlos syndrome-hypermobility type and gastrointestinal symptoms in university students: a cross-sectional study. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2017;29:e12942
  8. De Wandele I, Calders P, Peersman W, Rimbaut S, De Backer T, Malfait F, et al. Autonomic symptom burden in the hypermobility type of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: a comparative study with two other EDS types, fibromyalgia, and healthy controls. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2014;44:353-61
  9. Scheper MC, Juul-Kristensen B, Rombaut L, ameckers EA, Verbunt J, Engelbert RH. Disability in adolescents and adults diagnosed with hypermobility-related disorders: a meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2016;97:2174-87
  10. Scheper MC, Nicholson LL, Adams RD, Tofts L, Pacey V. The natural history of children with joint hypermobility syndrome and Ehlers-Danlos hypermobility type: a longitudinal cohort study. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2017;56:2073-83
  11. Scheper MC, de Vries JE, Juul-Kristensen B, Nollet F, Engelbert RH. The functional consequences of generalized joint hypermobility: a cross-sectional study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2014;15:243
  12. Remvig L, Jensen DV, Ward RC. Epidemiology of general joint hypermobility and basis for the proposed criteria for benign joint hypermobility syndrome: review of the literature. J Rheumatol 2007;34:804-9
  13. Remvig L, Flycht L, Christensen KB, Juul-Kristensen B. Lack of consensus on test