KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Law and Justice Review / 2011 / Sayı: 2

The history of alternative dispute resolutionsin the United States

Hümeyra Zeynep Nalçacıoğlu ERDEN
Sayfa
237–274
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

ADR techniques are the guidelines to cooperate with the opposite side and the US has ear-ly discovered how these techniques are beneficial.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The aim of this study is to present the birth, the improvements and the promotion of Alternative Dispute Resolutions (ADR) in the United States.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:After that, how America met ADR will be expressed in a chronological order between 1700 to 2000s with emphasizing and reasoning the most important steps, which are im-portant for the development of ADR in the US.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:ADR techniques are the guidelines to cooperate with the opposite side and the US has ear-ly discovered how these techniques are beneficial.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

The aim of this study is to present the birth, the improvements and the promotion of Alternative Dispute Resolutions (ADR) in the United States. In the research stage of this study, Emory University School of Law Library and its online law database were the guidelines. In this pa-per, the forms of common ADR procedures, which are negotiation, medi-ation, and arbitration, are introduced in brief and compared in order to get acquainted with them. Then premature ADR examples are explained in traditional societies and religions in order to notice the differences and improvements between before and now. After that, how America met ADR will be expressed in a chronological order between 1700 to 2000s with emphasizing and reasoning the most important steps, which are im-portant for the development of ADR in the US. As a human being the best means to understand each other is communication. ADR techniques are the guidelines to cooperate with the opposite side and the US has ear-ly discovered how these techniques are beneficial.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ERDEN, H. Z. N. (2011). The history of alternative dispute resolutionsin the United States. Law and Justice Review, Sayı: 2, 237–274. https://ajindex.com/articles/345265

Kaynakça (4)

  1. Academy of Family Mediators, www.mediate.com/people/personprofile.cfm?auid=724. ADR Preference and Usage Survey in Collaboration with Tort Trial and In-surance Practice Section of the American Bar Association prepared by Na-tional Arbitration Forum, 2006. Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR): An Overview: www.law.cornell.edu/wex/ index.php/ADR. Alternative Dispute Resolution, www.australianarbitration.com/alternative-dispute-resolution Arbitration Now Opportunities For Fairness, Process, Renewal and Invigora-tion (Paul H. Haagen ed., 1999),
  2. Atlas, N. F., Huber, S. K., and Trachte, W. E. 2000. ADR The Litigator’s Book. Section of Litigation Press:
  3. US. Barrett, J. T., and Barrett, J. P. 2004. A History of Alternative Dispute Reso-lution: The Story of a Political, Cultural, and Social Movement. Jossey-Bass: US. Beheshti, M. Arbitration in Islam, http://smma59.wordpress.com/2006/09/ 12/arbitration-in-islam/. Benham, R., Barton, A. B., Alternative Dispute Resolution: Ancient Models Provide Modern Inspiration, 12 Georgia State University L. R. 634. Bowman, F. O. American Buffalo: Vanishing Acquittals and The Gradual Extinction of the Federal Criminal Trial Lawyer, www.pennumbra.com/ responses/ 11-2007/Bowman.pdf. Cain, M., and Kulcsar, K. 1982. Thinking Disputes: An Essay on the Origins of the Dispute Industry. Law Society Review: Volume 16, Number 3. Christopher W. Moore, Negotiation, www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/army/ usace/ negotiation.htm. Cona, F. A., Application of Online Systems in Alternative Dispute Resolu-tion, 45 Buffalo L.R. 975 (1997).
  4. Cooper, L. J., Nolan, D. R. 2005. ADR in the Workplace. West Group Pub-lishing: US. Crowne, C.H., The Alternative Dispute Resolution Act of 1998: Implement-ing a New Paradigm of Justice, 76 N.Y.U. Law Review (December 2001), Volume 76. Cutler, A. C. 2003. Private Power and the Global Authority: Transitional Merchant Law in the Global Political Economy. Cambridge University Press: New York. Executive Order 10988 Law & Legal Definition, http://definitions.uslegal.com/e/ executive-order-10988. Fisher, R., Ury, W., and Patton, B. (1991). Getting to Yes. Penguin Books: US. Fulbright-Jaworski 6thLitigation Trends Survey Report (2009): Expect In-crease in Commercial International Arbitration, www.fulbright.com Goldberg, S. B., Green, E. D., and Sander, F. E. 1985. Dispute Resolution.Little Brown and Company: Boston. Haagen, P. H., ed. Arbitration Now: Opportunities for Fairness, Process Renewal and Invigoration. American Bar