Dergiler / Yakın Doğu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2

THE THEME OF CHANGE IN THE CONSERVATIVE IDEOLOGY

MUHAFAZAKÂR İDEOLOJİDE DEĞİŞİM TEMASI

Sayfa
59–78
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

This dilemma is unavoidable because like any other ideology, conservatism has a vision of ideal society, and ideologies are by their nature transformative, in other words, they are ‘anti-conservative’, in the narrow sense of the term.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This paper aims to clarify the role of change in the conservative thought and offer a framework for analyzing conservatism through this concept.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Although some thinkers perceive conservatism and change as mutually exclusive concepts, the theme of change always appears in both conservative politics and the conservative political thought.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:This dilemma is unavoidable because like any other ideology, conservatism has a vision of ideal society, and ideologies are by their nature transformative, in other words, they are ‘anti-conservative’, in the narrow sense of the term.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

This paper aims to clarify the role of change in the conservative thought and offer a framework for analyzing conservatism through this concept. Although some thinkers perceive conservatism and change as mutually exclusive concepts, the theme of change always appears in both conservative politics and the conservative political thought. Changes proposed by the conservatives are justified through the ‘natural-artificial’ dichotomy. Nevertheless, since the application of this dichotomy to the social norms is necessarily a theoretical move, there is a dilemma for the conservative mind which despises the theoretical thinking for the sake of the practical wisdom. This dilemma is unavoidable because like any other ideology, conservatism has a vision of ideal society, and ideologies are by their nature transformative, in other words, they are ‘anti-conservative’, in the narrow sense of the term.

Abstract

Bu makale, muhafazakâr düşüncede değişim kavramının yerini açıklığa kavuşturmayı ve değişim kavramı üzerinden muhafazakâr siyasetin okunmasını sağlayacak bir çerçeve önermeyi amaçlar. Muhafazakârlık ve değişim kavramlarının birbirlerini dışladığını ileri süren düşünürler olsa da, gerek muhafazakâr siyasette gerekse bu siyasetin düşünsel altyapısını oluşturan düşünürlerin eserlerinde bir değişim temasına her zaman rastlanır. Muhafazakârlık önerdiği toplumsal ve siyasal değişimleri ‘doğal-yapay’ kavram çifti üzerinden meşrulaştırır. Ancak bu ayrımın toplumsal formlara uygulanması zorunlu olarak kuramsal bir manevra olduğu için, gündelik yaşamın bilgeliğini kuramsal akla üstün tutan muhafazakâr akıl bu noktada bir çıkmaza düşmektedir. Bunun nedeni, her ideolojide olduğu gibi muhafazakârlıkta da bir ideal toplum kurgusunun olması, ideolojilerin doğaları gereği dönüştürücü olmaları, bir diğer ifadeyle kavramın dar anlamıyla anti-muhafazakâr olmalarıdır.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÖZSEL, D. (2014). THE THEME OF CHANGE IN THE CONSERVATIVE IDEOLOGY. Yakın Doğu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2, 59–78. https://ajindex.com/articles/332527

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Alexandre-Collier, A. (2011), “Nicolas Sarkozy’s UMP: The Reinvention of the Bonapartist Tradition?,” in Reflections on Conservatism, ed. D. Özsel, Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Newcastle upon Tyne, pp. 178-190.
  2. Blakemore, S. (1988), Burke and the Fall of Language: The French Revolution as Linguistic Event, University Press of New England, Hanover. Burke, E. (1791a), A Letter from Mr. Burke, to a Member of the National Assembly; in Answer to Some Objections to his Book on French Affairs, London. Burke, E. (1803), “Reflections on the Revolution in France, and on the Proceedings of Certain Societies in London relative to that Event,” in The Works of Edmund Burke– A New Edition,
  3. Vol V, F. And C. Rivington, London, pp. 27-435.
  4. Burke, E. (1970a), “The Nature of Society and Government,” in The Conservative Tradition in European Thought: An Anthology Selected and Edited by Robert Lindsay Schuettinger, Ed. R. L. Schuettinger, G. P. Putnam’s Sons, New York, pp. 38-44.
  5. Burke, E. (1970b), “Tradition and Progress,” in The Conservative Tradition in European Thought: An Anthology Selected and Edited by Robert Lindsay Schuettinger, ed. R. L. Schuettinger, G. P. Putnam’s Sons, New York, pp. 49-54.
  6. Burke, E. (1990), Miscellaneous Writings (Selected Works Vol. 4), Liberty Fund, Indianapolis, Retrieved January 15, 2011 from the World Wide Web: http://files.libertyfund.org/files/659/Burke_0005-04_EBk_v6.0.pdf
  7. Cameron, D. (2009),
  8. The Big Society, Retrieved January 22, 2010, from http://www.conservatives.com/News/Speeches/2009/11/David_Cameron_The_Big _Society.aspx. Casey, G. (2011), “Conservatism and Libertarianism: Friends or Foes?,” in Reflections on Conservatism, Ed. D. Özsel, Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Newcastle upon Tyne, pp. 33-53.
  9. Chapman, G. W. (1967), Edmund Burke: The Practical Imagination, Harvard University Press,
  10. Massachusetts. Crane, E. H. (2001), “The Dangers of Compassionate Conservatism,” in Cato Policy Report, May/June 2001, p. 2. Devigne, R. (1994), Recasting Conservatism: Oakeshott, Strauss, and the Response to Postmodernism, Yale University Press, New Haven. Dorey, p. (2011), “A Conservative “Third Way”?: British Conservatives and the Development of post-Thatcherite Conservatism,” in Reflections on Conservatism, ed. D. Özsel, Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Newcastle upon Tyne, pp. 146-177.
  11. De Bruyn, F. (1996), The Literary Genres of Edmund Burke: The Political Uses of Literary Form, Clarendon Press,
  12. Oxford. Egedy, G. (2011), “The Conservatism of Józse