KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi / 2010 / Sayı: 5

AN ANALYSIS OF THE EXPORT AND ECONOMIC GROWTH IN TURKEY OVER THE PERIOD OF 1950-2009

DİLEK TEMİZ
Aytaç GÖKMEN
Sayfa
123–141
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The direction of this causality is from economic growth (real GDP) to real export.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:real GDP) by using annual time series data for the Turkish economy over the period 1950-2006.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Thestudy applies a number of econometric techniques: ADF unit root test, Johansen cointegration test, vectorerror correction model (VECM), and Granger causality test.The results of this dissertation show that all the variables are stationary in the first difference.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The direction of this causality is from economic growth (real GDP) to real export.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:2006 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

real GDP) by using annual time series data for the Turkish economy over the period 1950-2006. Thestudy applies a number of econometric techniques: ADF unit root test, Johansen cointegration test, vectorerror correction model (VECM), and Granger causality test.The results of this dissertation show that all the variables are stationary in the first difference. Moreover,the Johansen cointegration test confirms the existence of the long run relationship among the twovariables. The Granger test shows one way causality from economic growth to real net exports. Thecausality results are consistent with the results reported by the Vector Error Correction Model (VECM).There is a long run and also short run causality relationship between the real export and the economicgrowth. The direction of this causality is from economic growth (real GDP) to real export.

Abstract

real GDP) by using annual time series data for the Turkish economy over the period 1950-2006. Thestudy applies a number of econometric techniques: ADF unit root test, Johansen cointegration test, vectorerror correction model (VECM), and Granger causality test.The results of this dissertation show that all the variables are stationary in the first difference. Moreover,the Johansen cointegration test confirms the existence of the long run relationship among the twovariables. The Granger test shows one way causality from economic growth to real net exports. Thecausality results are consistent with the results reported by the Vector Error Correction Model (VECM).There is a long run and also short run causality relationship between the real export and the economicgrowth. The direction of this causality is from economic growth (real GDP) to real export.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

TEMİZ, D., GÖKMEN, A. (2010). AN ANALYSIS OF THE EXPORT AND ECONOMIC GROWTH IN TURKEY OVER THE PERIOD OF 1950-2009. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi, Sayı: 5, 123–141. https://ajindex.com/articles/322641

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (7)

  1. ABDULAI, A and JAQUET, P. (2002), “ Exports and Economic Growth: Cointegration and Caus ality Evidence for Cote d'Ivoi re”, African Development Review, Vol. 14, No 1, pp. 1-17.
  2. ABOU-SAIT, F. (2005), “Are Exports the Engine of Economic Growth? An Application of Cointegration and Caus ality Analysis for Egypt, 1977-2003, Economic Research Working Paper No 76. AHMAD, J. and KWAN, A. C. C. (1991) “Causality between exports and economic growth: Empirical evidence from Africa”, Economics Letters, 37, pp. 243- - ALICI, A. A. and UCAL, M. S. (2003), “Foreign Direct Investment Exports and Output Growth of Turkey: Causality Analysis”, Paper to be presented at the European Trade Study Group (ETSG) Fifth Annual Conference Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. ÁLVAREZ-UDE, F. and GALVEZ, M. G., I. (2008), “Empırıcal Evıdence Of The Balance Of Payments Constraıned Growth In Cuba. The Effects Of Comercıal Regımes Sınce 1960”, http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/6993.
  3. Al-YOUSIF, Y. K. (1999), “On the role of exports in the economic growth of Malaysia: A multivariate analysis”, International Economic Journal 13: 67 – 75. AMADE. C; VASAVADA, U.; “Causality between productivity and exports in agriculture: Evidence from Asia and Latin America”, Journal of Agricultural Economics 46:174-186.
  4. ATABEK, A, COSAR, E. and SAHINGOZ, S. (2005), “A New Composite Leading Indicator for Turkish Economic Activity”, Emerging Markets Fianance and Trade, Vol. 40, No.1, pp. 45 – 64. BALASSA, B. (1978), “ Exports and economic growth: further evidence”, Journal of Development Economics, 5, pp. 181-189.
  5. BALASSA, B., (1985), “ Exports, Policy Choices, and Economic Growth in developing Countries Aft er the 1973 oil Shock", Journal of Development Economics, vol. 18, pp. 23-35.
  6. BERUMET, H. and DĐNÇER, N. (2004), “Do Capital Flows Improve Macroeconomic Performance in Emerging Markets?”, Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Vol. 40, No.4, pp.20 – 32. CENERRY, H. B., (1979), Structural Change and Development Policy, New York, Oxford University Press. CĐFTÇĐOĞLU, S. and KARAASLAN, C. (2005), “Comparison of Macroeconomic Performance of Turkey and East Asian Countries, and Econometric Analysis of Economic Growth in Turkey”, Problems and Perspectives in Management, Volume 2, pp. 17 – 24. DICKEY, D. and FULLER, W. (1981), “ Likelihood Ratio Statistics for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root”, Econometrica, Vol. 49, 1057-1072.
  7. DUTT, S. D. and GHOSH, D. (1994), “An empirical investigation of the export growth – e