Dergiler / Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi / 2011 / Sayı: 7

THE EUROPEANIZATION OF TURKEY: REFORM IN LOCAL GOVERNMENTS

Sayfa
103–126
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

This article aims to study the impact of the process ofintegration in Turkey in the context of local administration reform, which constituted the last section ofthe reform process and to demonstrate that it did not bring a substantial legal and institutional transformation.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:A longstanding pre-candidate and relatively recent candidate to join the EU, Turkey has experiencedmany ups and downs with the EU.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The period that begins with the recognition of its status as a candidatein 1999 and ends with the general elections held in 2007, that is to say, the recent period marked by thefirst interval of the AKP government, is probably the most significant of these highs where it would bepossible to evoke a process of Europeanization.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:This article aims to study the impact of the process ofintegration in Turkey in the context of local administration reform, which constituted the last section ofthe reform process and to demonstrate that it did not bring a substantial legal and institutional transformation.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2007 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

A longstanding pre-candidate and relatively recent candidate to join the EU, Turkey has experiencedmany ups and downs with the EU. The period that begins with the recognition of its status as a candidatein 1999 and ends with the general elections held in 2007, that is to say, the recent period marked by thefirst interval of the AKP government, is probably the most significant of these highs where it would bepossible to evoke a process of Europeanization. This article aims to study the impact of the process ofintegration in Turkey in the context of local administration reform, which constituted the last section ofthe reform process and to demonstrate that it did not bring a substantial legal and institutional transformation.

Abstract

A longstanding pre-candidate and relatively recent candidate to join the EU, Turkey has experiencedmany ups and downs with the EU. The period that begins with the recognition of its status as a candidatein 1999 and ends with the general elections held in 2007, that is to say, the recent period marked by thefirst interval of the AKP government, is probably the most significant of these highs where it would bepossible to evoke a process of Europeanization. This article aims to study the impact of the process ofintegration in Turkey in the context of local administration reform, which constituted the last section ofthe reform process and to demonstrate that it did not bring a substantial legal and institutional transformation.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ARIKAN, Y. E. (2011). THE EUROPEANIZATION OF TURKEY: REFORM IN LOCAL GOVERNMENTS. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi, Sayı: 7, 103–126. https://ajindex.com/articles/322515

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. ANDERSEN, S.S. (2004), “The Mosaic of Europeanization: An Organizational Perspective on National Re-contextualization”, Arena Working Papers, WP (11), Centre for European Studies, University of Oslo. Avrupa Birliği Genel Sekreterliği, Avrupa Birliği Müktesebatının Üstlenilmesine İlişkin Türkiye Ulusal Programları [National Program for the Adoption of the Acquis], available online at: http://www.abgs.gov.tr/index.php?p=194&l=1.
  2. AYDIN, M. & AÇIKMEŞE, S.A. (2007), “Europeanization through EU conditionality: understanding the new era in Turkish foreign policy”, Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans, 9(3), 263-274.
  3. BACHE, I. (2010), “Europeanization and multi-level governance: EU cohesion policy and pre-accession aid in Southeast Europe”, Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 10(1), 1-12.
  4. BACHE, I., & JORDAN, A. (2006), "Europeanization and domestic change”. I. Bache and A. Jordan (eds.), The Europeanization of British politics, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 17-36.
  5. BAYRAKTAR, S.U. (2007), Turkish municipalities: Reconsidering local democracy beyond administrative autonomy, available online at: http://wwwejtsorg.revues.org/document1103.html
  6. BELGENET (2002), AKP İktidarının Acil Eylem Planı [Emergency Action Plan of AKP government], available online at: http://www.belgenet.com/ eko/acileylem_161102.html. BÖRZEL, T, RISSE, T. (2000), “When Europe hits home: Europeanization and domestique change”, European Integration Online Papers (EloP), 4(15), available online at: http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2000-015a.htm.
  7. BÖRZEL, T. (1999), “Towards convergence in Europe? Institutional adaptation to Europeanization in Germany and Spain”. Journal of Common Market Studies, (4), 573-596.
  8. BÖRZEL, T. (2002), “Pace setting, foot-dragging and fence-sitting: Membres States responses to Europeanization”, Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(2), -214. BÖRZEL, T. & RISSE T. (2003), “Conceptualising the domestic impact of Europe”. K. Featherstone&C. Radaelli (eds.), The Politics of Europeanization, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 57-80.
  9. CASANOVA, J. (2006), “The Long, Difficult, and Tortuous Journey of Turkey into Europe and the Dilemmas of European Civilization”, Constellations, 13(2), -247. ÇELENK, A.A. (2009), “Europeanization and Administrative Reform: The Case of Turkey”, Mediterranean Politics, 14(1), 41-60.
  10. CHP (1999), „Yerel Çözüm 2000‟ [Local Solution 2000], available online at: http://www.chp.org.tr/Files/1999_02526_.pdf.
  11. CHP (2004), CHP Söz Veriyor: Yerel yönetim