KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Meandros Medical And Dental Journal / 2018 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 2

Evaluation of Different Root Canal Filling Methods in Primary Teeth

Sezin ÖZER
EMİNE ŞEN TUNÇ
ELİF KALYONCUOĞLU
Banu GÜLCAN
Sayfa
132–137
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusion: Based on the results of this study apart from the endodontic irrigation needle group, all the tested methods could be used for obturation of primary teeth.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: To compare the efficacy of 5 different methods for filling primary teeth root canals by digital radiography.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Materials and Methods: A total of 50 extracted primary anterior teeth with no more than 25% root resorption were prepared using Mtwo® NiTi rotary instruments to a standard apical file size.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusion: Based on the results of this study apart from the endodontic irrigation needle group, all the tested methods could be used for obturation of primary teeth.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Objective: To compare the efficacy of 5 different methods for filling primary teeth root canals by digital radiography. Materials and Methods: A total of 50 extracted primary anterior teeth with no more than 25% root resorption were prepared using Mtwo® NiTi rotary instruments to a standard apical file size. Teeth were randomly divided into 5 groups, as follows according to the sealer application method. Group 1: Metapex® syringe (control); group 2: Metapex® syringe and Endoactivator® (sonic activation); group 3: Metapex® syringe and indirect ultrasonic activation; group 4: Endodontic irrigation needle; group 5: Lentulo spiral. Photostimulated phosphor radiographs of canals were evaluated for length of filling (underfilled, suboptimally filled, optimally filled, overfilled) and quality of filling (presence, localization and total sum of voids). Data was statistically analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Bonferroni-corrected MannWhitney U tests. Results: For the both length and the quality of the filling the worse results were seen in the endodontic irrigation needle group (group 4) (p 0.05). Conclusion: Based on the results of this study apart from the endodontic irrigation needle group, all the tested methods could be used for obturation of primary teeth.

Abstract

Amaç: Süt dişleri kök kanallarının dolumu için kullanılan beş farklı metodun etkinliğinin dijital radyografi yöntemiyle karşılaştırılmasıdır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Çalışmada kök rezorpsiyonu %25’ten fazla olmayan toplam 50 adet çekilmiş süt ön diş kullanıldı. Dişler, Mtwo® NiTi döner aletler kullanılarak standart bir apikal genişlik elde edilecek şekilde hazırlandı. Dişler rastgele 5 gruba ayrıldı: grup 1: Metapex® şırınga (kontrol); grup 2: Metapex® şırınga ve Endoaktivatör® (sonik aktivasyon); grup 3: Metapex® şırınga ve indirekt ultrasonik aktivasyon grup 4: Endodontik irrigasyon iğnesi; grup 5: Lentulo spiral. Kanalların fosfor plakla alınmış radyografik görüntüleri ile kanal dolgusunun uzunluğu (yetersiz, ideale yakın, ideal ve taşkın dolgu) ve kalitesi (boşlukların varlığı, lokalizasyonu ve toplam alanı) değerlendirildi. Veriler istatistiksel olarak KruskalWallis ve Bonferroni-düzeltmeli Mann-Whitney U testleri kullanılarak analiz edildi. Bulgular: Kök kanal dolumları hem uzunluk hem de kalite anlamında değerlendirildiğinde en kötü sonuçlar endodontik irrigasyon iğnesi grubunda elde edildi (grup 4) (p 0,05). Sonuç: Çalışmanın sonuçlarına göre; endodontik irrigasyon iğnesi grubu dışında tüm test edilen yöntemler süt dişlerinin kanal dolgusu sırasında kullanılabilir.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÖZER, S., TUNÇ, E. Ş., KALYONCUOĞLU, E., GÜLCAN, B. (2018). Evaluation of Different Root Canal Filling Methods in Primary Teeth. Meandros Medical And Dental Journal, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 2, 132–137. https://ajindex.com/articles/282817

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. Thomas AM, Chandra S, Chandra S, Pandey RK. Elimination of infection in pulpectomized deciduous teeth: a short-term study using iodoform paste. J Endod 1994; 20: 233-5.
  2. Pinkham JR, Casamassimo PS, Mctigue DJ, Fields HW, Nowak AJ. Pediatric Dentistry: Infancy Through Adolescence. 4th ed. Philadelhia; Pa: WB Saunders Co; 2005; pp. 375-90.
  3. Cohen S, Hargreaves K. Pediatric Endodontics: Endodontic treatment for the primary and young permanent dentition. Pathways of pulp. 8th edition; 2002; pp. 893-5.
  4. Bawazir OA, Salama FS. Clinical evaluation of root canal obturation methods in primary teeth. Pediatr Dent 2006; 28: 39-47.
  5. Ozalp N, Saroğlu I, Sönmez H. Evaluation of various root canal filling materials in primary molar pulpectomies: an in vivo study. Am J Dent 2005; 18: 347-50.
  6. Nurko C, Garcia-Godoy F. Evaluation of a calcium hydroxide/ iodoform paste (Vitapex) in root canal therapy for primary teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent 1999; 23: 289-94.
  7. Sridhar N, Tandon S. Continued root-end growth and apexification using a calcium hydroxide and iodoform paste (Metapex®): three case reports. J Contemp Dent Pract 2010; 11: 63-70.
  8. Kahn FH, Rosenberg PA, Schertzer L, Korthals G, Nguyen PN. An in-vitro evaluation of sealer placement methods. Int Endod J 1997; 30: 181-6.
  9. Guelmann M, McEachern M, Turner C. Pulpectomies in primary incisors using three delivery systems: an in vitro study. Clin Pediatr Dent 2004; 28: 323-6.
  10. Dandashi MB, Nazif MM, Zullo T, Elliott MA, Schneider LG, Czonstkowsky M. An in vitro comparison of three endodontic techniques for primary incisors. Pediatr Dent 1993; 15: 254-6.
  11. Bagis B, Turkaslan S, Vallittu PK, Lassila LV. Effect of high frequency ultrasonic agitation on the bond strength of selfetching adhesives. J Adhes Dent 2009; 11: 369-74.
  12. Shahid S, Billington RW, Hill RG, Pearson GJ. The effect of ultrasound on the setting reaction of zinc polycarboxylate cements. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2010; 21: 2901-5.
  13. Plotino G, Pameijer CH, Grande NM, Somma F. Ultrasonics in endodontics: a review of the literature. J Endod 2007; 33: 81-95.
  14. Grover R, Mehra M, Pandit IK, Srivastava N, Gugnani N, Gupta M. Clinical efficacy of various root canal obturating methods in primary teeth: a comparative study. Eur J Paediatr Dent 2013; 14: 104-8. Schneider SW. A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1971; 32: 271-5.
  15. Shantiaee Y, Maziar F, Dianat O, Mahjour F. Comparing microleakage in root canals obturated with nanosilv