KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Meandros Medical And Dental Journal / 2021 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 1

Effect of Non-cadaveric Methods on the Anatomy Education of Medical Students

Kadavra Dışı Yöntemlerin Tıp Öğrencilerinin Anatomi Eğitimine Etkisi

Nazlı Gülriz ÇERİ
Sayfa
105–115
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

With the emergence of pandemic diseases, 3D applications will gain more importance as the future of anatomy education.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: Recently, with the inability to conduct face-to-face training due to the increasing cases of pandemic diseases such as the coronavirus disease-2019, the importance of digital applications in practical anatomy education has increased.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Materials and Methods: A total of 120 second-year medical student volunteers who had never used the three-dimensional (3D) Human Anatomy Application participated in the study.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:With the emergence of pandemic diseases, 3D applications will gain more importance as the future of anatomy education.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:2019 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Objective: Recently, with the inability to conduct face-to-face training due to the increasing cases of pandemic diseases such as the coronavirus disease-2019, the importance of digital applications in practical anatomy education has increased. This study aimed to compare cadaveric and non-cadaveric examination methods to evaluate the benefits of innovative models for education. Materials and Methods: A total of 120 second-year medical student volunteers who had never used the three-dimensional (3D) Human Anatomy Application participated in the study. They were asked to fill out a questionnaire containing their opinions about the anatomy lesson. Then, the students were randomly divided into three groups according to their learning methods. Results: Among the participants, 75.9% stated that working on the model was sufficient and 36.7% mostly used the printed human anatomy atlas when studying for practical lesson. While the success rates of different modules were similar in the practice groups, in the same module, the success of the 3D Human Anatomy Application group was higher than that of other practice groups. Conclusion: Although they had not used it before, students who received training with the 3D Human Anatomy Application were more successful than the other groups. 3D applications developed in recent years have offered a new perspective to anatomy education by creating a sense of reality without touching it and allow formations and examinations from all angles. With the emergence of pandemic diseases, 3D applications will gain more importance as the future of anatomy education.

Abstract

Amaç: Son yıllarda koronavirüs hastalığı-2019 gibi pandemik hastalıkların artmasıyla yüz yüze eğitimin yapılamaması anatomi uygulama eğitiminde dijital uygulamaların önemini artırmıştır. Gelişen teknolojinin yarattığı yenilikçi modellerin eğitime sağladığı yararları değerlendirmek için kadavra dışında kullandığımız yöntemleri kıyaslamak istedik. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Çalışmamıza üç boyutlu (3D) İnsan Anatomisi Uygulaması’nı hiç kullanmayan 120 ikinci sınıf tıp öğrencisi gönüllü katıldı. Öğrencilerden anatomi dersi ile ilgili görüşlerini içeren bir anket doldurmaları istendi. Daha sonra öğrenciler öğrenme yöntemlerine göre rastgele üç gruba ayrıldı. Bulgular: Anket sonucunda öğrencilerin %75,9’u maket üzerinde çalışmanın yeterli olduğunu, %36,7’si uygulama dersi için çalışırken en çok basılı insan anatomisi atlasını kullandığını belirtmiştir. Test sonucunda ise uygulama gruplarında farklı ders kurulları arasında başarı benzerken, aynı ders kurulunda 3D İnsan Anatomisi Uygulama grubunun başarısı diğer uygulama gruplarına göre daha yüksekti. Sonuç: Daha önce kullanmadıkları halde 3D İnsan Anatomisi Uygulaması ile eğitim alan öğrenciler diğer gruplara göre daha başarılı oldular. Son yıllarda gelişen 3D anatomi uygulamaları, dokunmadan gerçeklik hissi yaratarak ve oluşumların tüm açılardan incelenmesine olanak sağlayarak anatomi eğitimine yeni bir bakış açısı sunmuştur. Artan pandemik hastalıklar nedeniyle anatomi eğitiminin geleceğinde daha fazla önem kazanacağını düşünüyoruz.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÇERİ, N. G. (2021). Effect of Non-cadaveric Methods on the Anatomy Education of Medical Students. Meandros Medical And Dental Journal, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 1, 105–115. https://ajindex.com/articles/282737

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (16)

  1. Meyer JJ, Obmann MM, Gießler M, Schuldis D, Brückner AK, Strohm PC, et al. Interprofessional approach for teaching functional knee joint anatomy. Ann Anat 2017; 210: 155-9
  2. Böckers A, Jerg-Bretzke L, Lamp C, Brinkmann A, Traue HC, Böckers TM. The gross anatomy course: an analysis of its importance. Anat Sci Educ 2010; 3: 3-11
  3. McLachlan JC, Patten D. Anatomy teaching: ghosts of the past, present and future. Med Educ 2006; 40: 243-53
  4. Kamphuis C, Barsom E, Schijven M, Christoph N. Augmented reality in medical education? Perspect Med Educ 2014; 3: 300- 11
  5. Kawashiro Y, Anahara R, Kohno T, Mori C, Matsuno Y. Attitudes of healthcare students on gross anatomy laboratory sessions. Anat Sci Educ 2009; 2: 273-9
  6. McLachlan JC, Bligh J, Bradley P, Searle J. Teaching anatomy without cadavers. Med Educ 2004; 38: 418-24
  7. Winkelmann A. Anatomical dissection as a teaching method in medical school: a review of the evidence. Med Educ 2007; 41: 15-22
  8. Zhang L, Wang Y, Xiao M, Han Q, Ding J. An ethical solution to the challenges in teaching anatomy with dissection in the Chinese culture. Anat Sci Educ 2008; 1: 56-9
  9. Trelease RB. From chalkboard, slides, and paper to e-learning: How computing technologies have transformed anatomical sciences education. Anat Sci Educ 2016; 9: 583-602
  10. Fruhstorfer BH, Palmer J, Brydges S, Abrahams PH. The use of plastinated prosections for teaching anatomy--the view of medical students on the value of this learning resource. Clin Anat 2011; 24: 246-52
  11. Azer SA, Eizenberg N. Do we need dissection in an integrated problem-based learning medical course? Perceptions of firstand second-year students. Surg Radiol Anat 2007; 29: 173-80
  12. Riederer BM, Bueno-López JL. Anatomy, respect for the body and body donation-A guide for good practice. Eur J Anat 2014; 18: 361-8
  13. Habicht JL, Kiessling C, Winkelmann A. Bodies for Anatomy Education in Medical Schools: An Overview of the Sources of Cadavers Worldwide. Acad Med 2018; 93: 1293-300
  14. Garment A, Lederer S, Rogers N, Boult L. Let the dead teach the living: the rise of body bequeathal in 20th-century America. Acad Med 2007; 82: 1000-5
  15. Biasutto SN, Sharma N, Weiglein AH, Benia FM, McBride J, BuenoLópez JL, et al. Human bodies to teach anatomy: Importance and procurement-Experience with cadaver donation. Rev Argent Anat Clin 2014; 6: 72-86
  16. Yaqinuddin A, Ikram MF, Zafar M, Eldin NS, Mazhar MA, Qazi S, et al. The integrated clinical anatomy program at Alfa