Dergiler / Medicine Science / 2016 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1

Repeatability and Reproducibility of a New Partial Coherence Interferometer; AL-Scan Optic Biometer

Sayfa
222–232
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The precision of the measurements obtained by the AL-Scan biometer is highly reliable and observer-independent

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The purpose of this study was to evaluate the intra-observer repeatability and inter-observer reproducibility of the ocular parameter measurements in cataract eyes using the new partial coherence interferometer, AL-Scan.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The measurements were repeated by the same observers using the same AL-Scan unit on the same eye approximately 2 weeks later, just before surgery.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The precision of the measurements obtained by the AL-Scan biometer is highly reliable and observer-independent
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the intra-observer repeatability and inter-observer reproducibility of the ocular parameter measurements in cataract eyes using the new partial coherence interferometer, AL-Scan. Eighty-six eyes with cataracts were included in this prospective study. Axial length, average keratometry, anterior chamber depth, central corneal thickness, white-to-white distance and intraocular lens power calculation with the SRK-T formula were determined by two observers. The measurements were repeated by the same observers using the same AL-Scan unit on the same eye approximately 2 weeks later, just before surgery. Inter-observer reproducibility was excellent, with very high interclass correlation coefficients (˃0.984) for all measured parameters. Standard deviations (Sw) and coefficients of variation (CV) of the repeated measurements were low, which demonstrated high intra-observer repeatability, except for the central corneal thickness and white-to-white distance measurements (Sw≤0.224 ∞CV≤ 1.072). The precision of the measurements obtained by the AL-Scan biometer is highly reliable and observer-independent

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

TETİKOĞLU, M., SAĞDIK, H. M., AKTAŞ, S., ÖZCURA, F. (2016). Repeatability and Reproducibility of a New Partial Coherence Interferometer; AL-Scan Optic Biometer. Medicine Science, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1, 222–232. https://ajindex.com/articles/277686

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (16)

  1. Holladay JT. Refractive power calculation for intraocular lenses in the phakic eye. Am J Ophtalmol. 1993;116(1):63-6
  2. Fontes BM, Castro E. Intraocular lenses power calculation by measuring axial length with partial coherence and ultrasonic biometry. Arg Bras Oftalmol. 2011;74(3):166-70
  3. Olsen T. Sources of error in intraocular lens power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1992;18(2):125-9
  4. Carkeet A, Saw SM, Gazzard G, Tang W, Tan DT. Repeatability of IOLMaster biometry in children. Optom Vis Sci. 2004;81(11):829-34
  5. Haigis W, Lega B, Miller N. Comparison of immersion ultrasound biometry and partial coherence interferometry for intraocular lens calculation accordig to Haigis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophtalmol. 2000;238(9):765-73
  6. Hill W, Angeles R, Otani T. Evaluation of a new IOLMaster algorithm to measure axial lenght. J Cataract Ref Surg. 2008;34(6):920-4
  7. ISO 5725. Precision of Test Methods-Determination of Repeatability and Reproducibility for a Standart Test Method by Inter-laboratory test. 2nd ed. Geneva:International Organization for Standardization;1986
  8. Freeman G, Pesudovs K. The impact of cataract severity on measurment acquisition with the IOLMaster. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2005;83(4):439-42
  9. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1(8476):307-10
  10. Norrby S. Sources of error in intraocular lens power calculation. J Cat Refract Surg. 2008;34(3):368-76
  11. Jin GJ, Crandall AS, Jones JJ. Intraocular lens exchange due to incorrect lens power. Ophthalmology. 2007;114(3):417-24
  12. Sahin A, Hamrah P. Clinically relevant biometry. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2012;23(1):47-53
  13. Packer M, Fine IH, Hoffman RS, Coffman PG, Brown LK. Immersion A-scan compared with partial coherence interferometry; outcomes analysis. J Cat Refract Surg. 2002;28(2):239-42
  14. Bhatt AB, Schefler AC, Feuer WJ, Yoo SH, Murray TG. Comparison of predictions made by the intraocular lens master and ultrasound biometry. Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126(7):929-33
  15. Huang J, Savini G, Li J, Lu W, Wu F, Wang J, Li Y, Feng Y, Wang Q. Evaluation of a new optical biometry device for measurements of ocular components and its comparison with IOLMaster. Br J Ophthalmol. 2014;98(9):1277-81
  16. Kaswin G, Rousseau A, Mgarrech M, Barreau E, Labetuulle M. Biometry and intraocular lens power calculation results with a new optical biometry device: comparison with the gold standard. Cataract