Dergiler / Medicine Science / 2018 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3

Fentanyl with low dose bupivacaine (isobaric and hyperbaric) and levobupivacaine for combined spinal-epidural technique in cesarean section

Sayfa
494–498
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Sensory block with no motor block was provided by adding fentanyl, especially to levobupivacaine, which eases perioperative period and delivers patient comfort.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:To compare the hemodynamic and motor block effects of fentanyl combined with low doses of isobaric and hyperbaric bupivacaine and isobaric levobupivacaine in Caesarean operations with Combined Spinal-Epidural Anesthesia (CSEA) method.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Methods: A hundred and sixty pregnant women were randomly divided into four groups (n=40).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Sensory block with no motor block was provided by adding fentanyl, especially to levobupivacaine, which eases perioperative period and delivers patient comfort.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

To compare the hemodynamic and motor block effects of fentanyl combined with low doses of isobaric and hyperbaric bupivacaine and isobaric levobupivacaine in Caesarean operations with Combined Spinal-Epidural Anesthesia (CSEA) method. The aim of study is to use levobupivacaine and bupivacaine more effectively and comfortably in caesarean sections. Methods: A hundred and sixty pregnant women were randomly divided into four groups (n=40). A total volume of 1.8 mL containing 9 mg of plain bupivacaine (Group A), 5 mg of plain bupivacaine plus 40 µg fentanyl (Group B), 5 mg of plain levobupivacaine plus 40 µg fentanyl (Group C) and 5mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine plus 40 µg fentanyl (Group D) were applied. Results: Hemodynamic parameters and level of sensory block did not differ among the groups. Time to reach T4 sensory block level was 6 ± 1 min for Group A, 4 ± 1 min for Group B and C, and 7.5±2.5 min for Group D (P= 0.045). Bromage scores were: 110.5 ± 10.1 min, 90.1 ±11.1 min, and 85.1 ± 10.2 min for Group A, B and D, respectively. The patients in Group C had no motor block. Conclusions: Combining fentanyl (40 µg) with low dose (5 mg) isobaric and hyperbaric bupivacaine, and isobaric levobupivacaine provided sufficient anesthesia. Sensory block with no motor block was provided by adding fentanyl, especially to levobupivacaine, which eases perioperative period and delivers patient comfort.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ATALAY, C., KARACA, M., NALDAN, M. E., SOYALP, C., KÜRŞAD, H. (2018). Fentanyl with low dose bupivacaine (isobaric and hyperbaric) and levobupivacaine for combined spinal-epidural technique in cesarean section. Medicine Science, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3, 494–498. https://ajindex.com/articles/277298

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Malvasi A, Tinelli A, Stark M, et al. Low-dose sequential combined spinalepidural anaesthesia in elective Stark caesarean section: a preliminary cohort study. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2010;14:215-21.
  2. Atalay C, Aksoy M, Aksoy AN, et al. Combining intrathecal bupivacaine and meperidine during Caesarean section to prevent spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension and other side effects. J Int Med Res. 2010;38:1626-36.
  3. Goyal A, Shankaranarayan P, Ganapathi P. A randomized clinical study comparing spinal anesthesia with isobaric levobupivacaine with fentanyl and hyperbaric bupivacaine with fentanyl in elective cesarean sections. Anesth Essays Res. 2015;9:57-62.
  4. Glaser C, Marhofer P, Zimpfer G, et al. Levobupivacaine versus racemic bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2002;94:194-8.
  5. Gautier P, De Kock M, Huberty L, et al. Comparison of the effects of intrathecal ropivacaine, levobupivacaine, and bupivacaine for caesarean section. Br J Anaesth. 2003;91:684–9.
  6. Casati A, Putzu. Bupivacaine, levobupivacaine and ropivacaine: are they clinically different? Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2005;19:247-68.
  7. Sen H, Purtuloglu T, Sızlan A, et al. Comparison of intrathecal hyperbaric and isobaric levobupivacaine in urological surgery. Minerva Anesthesiol. 2010;76:24-8.
  8. Guasch E, Gilsanz F, Diez J, et al. Maternal hypotension with low doses of spinal bupivacaine or levobupivacaine and epidural volume expansion with saline for cesarean section. Rev Esp Anesthesiol Reanim. 2010;57:267-74.
  9. Turkmen A, Dondu MG, Ali A, et al. Comparison of the anesthetic effects of intrathecal levobupivacaine + fentanyl and bupivacaine + fentanyl during caesarean section. Middle East J Anesthesiol. 2012;21:577-82.
  10. Guler G, Cakir G, Ulgey A, et al. A comparison of spinal anesthesia with levobupivacaine and hyperbaric bupivacaine for cesarean sections: A randomized trial. Open J Anesthesiol. 2012;2:84-9.
  11. Duggal R, Kapoor R, Moyal G. A comparison of intrathecal levobupivacaine with hyperbaric bupivacaine for elective cesarean section: A prospective randomized double-blind study. J Obstet Anaesth Critical Care. 2015;5:7883. Bogra J, Arora N, Srivastava P. Synergistic effect of intrathecal fentanyl and bupivacaine in spinal anesthesia for cesarean section. BMC Anesth. 2005;5:5. Bryson GL, Macneil R, Jeyaraj LM, et al. Small dose spinal bupivacaine for Cesarean delivery does not reduce hypotension but accelerates motor recovery. Can J Anaesth. 2007;54:531-7.
  12. Gunusen I, Karaman S, Sargin A, e