KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1

Students’ Perceptions About Learning Environment of a Distance Course Based on Technology Acceptance Model: A Descriptive Study

-

Erman UZUN
Ali YILDIRIM
M.yaşar ÖZDEN
Sayfa
201–211
Yayın Tarihi
2013-03-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

It is believed that the underlying reason of this situation was based on the students’ low computer competency and e-learning experiences.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) is a measure to assess the underlying reasons about the use of a technology.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The participants were the 32 first year vocational higher education institution students.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:It is believed that the underlying reason of this situation was based on the students’ low computer competency and e-learning experiences.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Teknoloji kabul modeli · motivasyon algısı · kullanışlılık algısı

Özet

Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) is a measure to assess the underlying reasons about the use of a technology. In this study an extended version of TAM were used. This extended version composed of three factors. These are “perceived motivation towards learning environment”, “perceived usefulness” and “perceived ease of use”. In this study, the learning environment of a distance course was investigated to see students’ perceptions. This distance course was delivered from one university to the other university via video-conferencing with ITL Learning Gateway content management system during the whole semester. The participants were the 32 first year vocational higher education institution students. The descriptive findings revealed that each factor of TAM perceived by students as having moderate advantages. It is believed that the underlying reason of this situation was based on the students’ low computer competency and e-learning experiences.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate students’ perceptions of learning environment of a distance course through Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), a measure to assess the underlying reasons about the use of a technology. This distance course was delivered from one university to the other university via video-conferencing with ITL Learning Gateway content management system in one semester. An extended version of TAM was used as conceptual framework, which composed of three factors: “perceived motivation towards learning environment”, “perceived usefulness” and “perceived ease of use”. A total of 32 first year vocational higher education institution students who registered for this distance course participated in this study. Data were collected through a questionnaire based on the extended version of TAM. The findings revealed that each factor of TAM was perceived by students as “moderately advantageous.” This perception could be due to students’ low computer competency and e-learning experiences.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

UZUN, E., YILDIRIM, A., ÖZDEN, M. (2013). Students’ Perceptions About Learning Environment of a Distance Course Based on Technology Acceptance Model: A Descriptive Study. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1, 201–211. https://ajindex.com/articles/248568

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. Bertrand, M. & Bouchard, S. (2008). Applying the technology acceptance model to VR with people who are favorable to its use. Journal of CyberTherapy and Rehabilitation, 1(2), 200-210.
  2. Chang, S., Chou, C., and Yang, J. (2010). The literature review of technology acceptance model: A study of the bibliometric distributions, PACIS 2010 Proceedings, 1634-1640.
  3. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of ınformation technology. MIS Quarterly, 3 (2), 319-339.
  4. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., and Warshaw, P. R. (1989), User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models, Management Science, 35, 982–1003
  5. Dishaw, M. T. and Strong, D. M. (1999). Extending the technology acceptance model with tasktechnology fit constructs. Information and Management, 36(1), 9-21.
  6. Garson, G. David. (2007). Scales and Standard Measures. Retrieved on August 24, 2010, from http://www2.chass.ncsu.edu/garson/pa765/standard.htm
  7. Gefen, D. (2004). What makes an ERP implementation relationship worthwhile: linking trust mechanism and ERP usefulness. Journal of Management Information Systems, 21 (1), 263-288.
  8. Gündüz, H. B. (2010). Digital divide in Turkish primary schools: Sakarya sample. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9(1), 43-53.
  9. Hudson, H. (2011). The Digital Divide. Instructor, 121(2), 46-50.
  10. Işık, A., Aşkun, C. S., Özden, M. Y. (2010). Perceptions of students and teachers about the use of elearning / sharing portal in educational activities. In D'Agustino S. (Ed.). Resistance and Access to Instructional Technologies: Assessing Future Trends in Education, IGI Press.
  11. Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Computers as Mindtools For Schools: Engaging Critical Thinking. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall. Karahanna, E. and Straub, D.W. (1999). The psychological origins of perceived usefulness and ease of use. Information and Management, 35(4), 237-250.
  12. King, W.R., & He, J. (2006). A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model. Information & Managemement, 43, 740-755.
  13. Koç, E., Yıldırım Z. & Özden, M.Y., (2006), Perceptions on problem-based online learning, Academic Exchange Quarterly, 10(3), 34-38.
  14. Koufaris, M. (2003). Applying the technology acceptance model and flow theory to online consumer behaviour. Information Systems Research, 13 (2), 205-223.
  15. Lederer, A. L., Maupin, D. J., Sena, M. P., & Zhuang, Y. (2000). The technology acceptance model and the world wild web. Decision Support Systems, 29