KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Participatory Educational Research / 2017 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1

Evaluation Of Constructivist Learning Approach Through Experimental Studies

Gürbüz OCAK
İjlal OCAK
Serkan BOYRAZ
Sayfa
1–8
Yayın Tarihi
2016-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Studies examine the impact of some teaching and learning theories and methods that are used in constructive approach and compare them with traditional teaching applications, especially through pre and post-test experimental design with a control group.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The aim of this study is to provide some findings about inclinations, number of studies, study, data analysis, sampling methods and so on, and to summarize the results of the studies: i) which were published between 2005 when new curricula were introduced and 2016 (until March when data collection was done); ii) were published in a journal indexed in Turkish National Academic Network and Information Center (Ulakbim); iii) that consist one of the following keywords in its title: “constructivism”, “constructivist learning/teaching”, “constructive approach”, and iv) that employed experimental method.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:A total of 37 studies that employed the experimental method were published between 2006 and 2016 with one of the keywords in its title and could be reached in a journal indexed in Ulakbim.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Studies examine the impact of some teaching and learning theories and methods that are used in constructive approach and compare them with traditional teaching applications, especially through pre and post-test experimental design with a control group.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2005 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:constructivism · experimental design

Abstract

The aim of this study is to provide some findings about inclinations, number of studies, study, data analysis, sampling methods and so on, and to summarize the results of the studies: i) which were published between 2005 when new curricula were introduced and 2016 (until March when data collection was done); ii) were published in a journal indexed in Turkish National Academic Network and Information Center (Ulakbim); iii) that consist one of the following keywords in its title: “constructivism”, “constructivist learning/teaching”, “constructive approach”, and iv) that employed experimental method. This study employs the descriptive method which aims to represent a situation as it is, and documentary analysis will be used as data analysis method. A total of 37 studies that employed the experimental method were published between 2006 and 2016 with one of the keywords in its title and could be reached in a journal indexed in Ulakbim. They will be used as the data source. These studies will be examined on many different aspects in order to find out inclinations and changes about constructive learning and teaching experiences and understand how effective they have been. The year with the most number of studies is 2009 with 6 studies and there are 5 studies in both 2011 and 2012. The samples used in these studies are from all grade levels. Studies examine the impact of some teaching and learning theories and methods that are used in constructive approach and compare them with traditional teaching applications, especially through pre and post-test experimental design with a control group.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

OCAK, G., OCAK, İ., BOYRAZ, S. (2016). Evaluation Of Constructivist Learning Approach Through Experimental Studies. Participatory Educational Research, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1, 1–8. https://ajindex.com/articles/239243

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (5)

  1. Beerenwinkel, A., & Arx, M. v. (2016). Constructivism in Practice: an Exploratory Study of Teaching Patterns and Student Motivation in Physics Classrooms in Finland, Germany and Switzerland. Research in Science Education. doi:10.1007/s11165-015-9497-3
  2. Campbell, R., Kyriakides, L., Muijs, R., & Robinson, W. (2003). Differential teacher effectiveness: towards a model for research and teacher appraisal. Oxford Review of Education, 29(3), 347-362.
  3. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education (6. b.). London: Routledge. Gijbels, D., Watering, G. V., Dochy, F., & Bossche, P. V. (2006). New learning environments and constructivism: The students’ perspective. Instructional Science, 34, 213-226. doi:10.1007/s11251-005-3347-z Karagiorgi, Y., & Symeou, L. (2005). Translating constructivism into instructional design: potential and limitations. Educational Technology & Society, 8(1), 17-27.
  4. Kroesbergen, E. H., & Luit, J. E. (2005). Constructivist mathematics education for students with mild mental retardation. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 20(1), 107- 116. doi:10.1080/0885625042000319115 Matthews, W. J. (2003). Constructivism in the Classroom: Epistemology, History, and Empirical Evidence. Teacher Education Quarterly, 51-64.
  5. Miles, M., & Huberman, A. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis (2. b.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Schmidt, H. G., Molen, H. T., Winkel, W. W., & Wijnen, W. H. (2009). Constructivist, problem-based learning does work: a meta-analysis of curricular comparisons ınvolving a single medical school. Educational Psychologist, 44(4), 227-249. doi:10.1080/00461520903213592 Smeda, N. (2014). Creating Constructivist Learning Environments with Digital Storytelling (PhD. Dissertation). Victoria University. Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2005). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri (Extended 5th ed.). Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.