Dergiler / Research Journal of Business and Management / 2017 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3

THE LINK BETWEEN ATTRIBUTES AND CITY BRAND MEANINGS: AN ANALYSIS FOR MULTIPLE STAKEHOLDERS

Sayfa
372–383
Yayın Tarihi
2017-09-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

This study makes theoretical contributions to the city branding literature with covering views of residents, tourists and students for a specific brand meaning as a living place, studying place, or visiting place.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Purpose- This paper investigates the perceptions of different target groups such as residents, tourists, and students about a city brand by using five city brand attributes such as urbanity&cultural activities, infrastructure, nature&environment, economic conditions, and job opportunities&business networks.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Urbanity&cultural activities, infrastructure, nature&environment, and economic conditions make significant contributions to the attitudes as a studying place.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:This study makes theoretical contributions to the city branding literature with covering views of residents, tourists and students for a specific brand meaning as a living place, studying place, or visiting place.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:city brand · city attributes · residents

Abstract

Purpose- This paper investigates the perceptions of different target groups such as residents, tourists, and students about a city brand by using five city brand attributes such as urbanity&cultural activities, infrastructure, nature&environment, economic conditions, and job opportunities&business networks. Methodology- A quantitative survey was conducted in order to test hypotheses and linear multiple regression was used to assess the predictive power of city brand attributes. Findings- Urbanity&cultural activities and nature&environment affect the city brand attitude as a living place for the samples of residents, students, and tourists. Urbanity&cultural activities, infrastructure, nature&environment, and economic conditions make significant contributions to the attitudes as a studying place. City brand attitude as a visiting place has been affected from urbanity&cultural activities, nature&environment, and infrastructure. Economic conditions are the most crucial element providing that the residents and tourists consider any city as a liveable city, while job opportunities&business network is the most important factor for students. Conclusion- Stakeholders' perceptions about a city vary according to their purpose of existing in the city. This study makes theoretical contributions to the city branding literature with covering views of residents, tourists and students for a specific brand meaning as a living place, studying place, or visiting place.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

SİGİNDİ, T. (2017). THE LINK BETWEEN ATTRIBUTES AND CITY BRAND MEANINGS: AN ANALYSIS FOR MULTIPLE STAKEHOLDERS. Research Journal of Business and Management, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3, 372–383. https://ajindex.com/articles/238974

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Braun, E. (2008). City marketing: Towards an integrated approach. PhD dissertation, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM). Braun, E.; Kavaratzis, M; Zenker, S. (2010). My city – My brand: The role of residents in place branding. 50th European Regional Science Association Congress proceedings, Jönköping, Sweden, 19th – 23rd August. Carrillo, F.J. (2004). Capital cities: A taxonomy of capital accounts for knowledge cities. Journal of Knowledge Management, 8(5), 28-46.
  2. DeHoog, R.H.; Lowery, D.; Lyons, W.E. (1990). Citizen satisfaction with local government services: A test of individual, jurisdictional, and city specific explanations. Journal of Politics, 52, 807-837.
  3. Dinnie, K. (2010). City branding: Theory and cases. Palgrave Macmillan. Evans, G. (2002). Living in a World Heritage City: stakeholders in the dialectic of the universal and particular. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 8(2), 117-135.
  4. Embacher, J. and Buttle, F. (1989). A Repertory grid analysis of Austria’s image as a summer vacation destination. Journal of Travel Research, 27(3), 3-7.
  5. Gallarza, M.G.; Saura, I.G. and Garcia, H.C. (2002). Destination image: Towards a conceptual framework. Annals of Tourism Research, 29(1). 56-78.
  6. Gustavson, E. and Elander, I. (2012). Cocky and climate smart? Climate change mitigation and place-branding in three Swedish towns. Local Environment, 17(8), 769-782.
  7. Hall, C.M. (2008). Santa Claus, place branding and competition. Fennia, 186(1), 59-67.
  8. Hankinson, G. (2004). The brand images of tourism destinations: a study of the saliency of organic images. Journal of Product&Brand Management, 13(1), 6-14. Hankinson, (2001). Location branding: A study of the branding practices of 12 English cities. Brand Management, 9(2), 127-142.
  9. Huang, C.; Oh, K.; Zhang, Q.; Choi, Y.J. (2013). Understanding the city brand in the regional tourism market among college students. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 30(7), 662-671.
  10. Insch, A. and Florek, M. (2008). A great place to live, work and play: Conceptualising place satisfaction in the case of a city's residents. Journal of place management and Development, 1(2), 138-149.
  11. Insch, A. (2010). Managing residents’ satisfaction with city life: Application of Importance – Satisfaction analysis. Journal of Town&City Management, 1(2), 164-174.
  12. Jones, R. (2005). Finding sources of brand value: developing a stakeholder model of brand equity. Journal of Brand Management, 13(1), 1032. Kazancoglu, İ. and Dirsehan, T. (2014)