Dergiler / Research Journal of Business and Management / 2026 / Volume: 13 Issue: 1

FROM TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE TO ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ADOPTION: COMPARATIVE INSIGHTS FROM THE UNITED STATES, SOUTH KOREA AND TURKIYE

Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2026-06-30
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The results offer practical insights for policymakers seeking to align digital transformation strategies with long-term sustainability goals, while future research should broaden comparative scope and examine sectoral and long-term impacts of AI adoption on sustainability performance.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Purpose- This study explores the conceptual transition from the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) toward emerging Artificial Intelligence acceptance perspectives while comparatively examining technological development and its associations with sustainability indicators in the United States, South Korea and Turkiye.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Despite growing literature on AI adoption, cross-country assessments linking AI capacity with environmental performance remain limited.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The results offer practical insights for policymakers seeking to align digital transformation strategies with long-term sustainability goals, while future research should broaden comparative scope and examine sectoral and long-term impacts of AI adoption on sustainability performance.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Artificial intelligence · artificial intelligence acceptance · sustainability

Abstract

Purpose- This study explores the conceptual transition from the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) toward emerging Artificial Intelligence acceptance perspectives while comparatively examining technological development and its associations with sustainability indicators in the United States, South Korea and Turkiye. Despite growing literature on AI adoption, cross-country assessments linking AI capacity with environmental performance remain limited. This study addresses this gap by evaluating the alignment between national AI development trajectories and sustainability outcomes. Methodology- The research adopts a comparative descriptive design based on secondary data from internationally recognized reports and statistical databases. Country-level indicators related to AI investment, innovation capacity, carbon intensity, renewable energy use and environmental performance are systematically compared. The study does not aim to establish causal relationships but rather to identify associative patterns across countries at different stages of technological development. Findings- Results suggest that higher levels of AI investment and technological capacity are descriptively associated with improvements in energy efficiency, reductions in carbon emissions and enhanced environmental performance. However, the strength of this relationship varies according to national technological readiness and institutional capacity. The United States shows the strongest alignment between AI development and sustainability improvement, South Korea demonstrates moderate progress, and Turkiye shows ongoing technological development, although sustainability gains remain comparatively limited due to structural and implementation challenges. Conclusion- The study extends technology acceptance discussions beyond the individual level by presenting a comparative national framework linking AI adoption with sustainable development outcomes. Findings indicate that technological investment alone is insufficient; effective sustainability performance requires institutional capacity and coordinated policy implementation. The results offer practical insights for policymakers seeking to align digital transformation strategies with long-term sustainability goals, while future research should broaden comparative scope and examine sectoral and long-term impacts of AI adoption on sustainability performance.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Savaşkan, D. E. (2026). FROM TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE TO ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ADOPTION: COMPARATIVE INSIGHTS FROM THE UNITED STATES, SOUTH KOREA AND TURKIYE. Research Journal of Business and Management, Volume: 13 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2026.2047

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (22)

  1. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.
  2. Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, D. L., Ismagilova, E., et al. (2021). Artificial intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities and agenda for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 57, 101994. https://www.elsevier.com/research-intelligence
  3. Glikson, E., & Woolley, A. W. (2020). Human trust in artificial intelligence: Review of empirical research. Academy of Management Annals, 14(2), 627–660.
  4. IEA. (2024). World energy statistics 2024. International Energy Agency. https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-statistics-2024
  5. Longoni, C., Bonezzi, A., & Morewedge, C. K. (2022). Resistance to medical artificial intelligence. Journal of Consumer Research, 48(6), 1057–1078.
  6. Marangunić, N., & Granić, A. (2015). Technology acceptance model: A literature review from 1986 to 2013. Universal Access in the Information Society, 14(1), 81–95.
  7. McKinsey Global Institute. (2023). The economic potential of generative AI: The next productivity frontier. McKinsey & Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/mgi
  8. OECD. (2024). AI investment indicators 2024. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/sti/ai-investment-indicators-2024.pdf
  9. OECD. (2024). OECD digital economy outlook 2024. OECD Publishing. Shankar, R., & Datta, B. (2022). Artificial intelligence acceptance model: Exploring user trust and ethics in AI adoption. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 183, 121880.
  10. Ragin, C. C. (2014). The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies (2nd ed.). University of California Press.
  11. Stanford University. (2023). AI Index Report 2023. Stanford Institute for Human-Centered AI.
  12. Stanford University. (2024). AI index report 2024. Stanford Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence. https://aiindex.stanford.edu
  13. Sturm, R., Müller, A., & Schneider, T. (2023). Artificial intelligence adoption models in organizational contexts: A review of applications across sectors. Journal of Technology Management, 40(2), 123–145.
  14. UNESCO. (2023). Artificial intelligence and sustainable development goals. UNESCO Publishing. https://www.unesco.org/en/ai-sdg
  15. United Nations. (2023). Sustainable development report 2023. United Nations. https://sdgs.un.org
  16. United Nations. (2023). Science, technology and innovation report 2023. UNCTAD. https://unctad.org/publication/science-technology-and- innovation-2023
  17. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204.
  18. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.
  19. Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2016). Unified theory of acceptance and use of the Association for Information Systems, 17(5), 328–376. technology: A synthesis and the road ahead. Journal of
  20. TÜBİTAK. (2023). Ulusal yapay zekâ stratejisi (2021–2025) izleme raporu. Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu. https://www.tubitak.gov.tr
  21. World Bank. (2024). World development indicators 2024. The World Bank. https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development- indicators
  22. World Economic Forum. (2023). Global future council on artificial intelligence for humanity report. Geneva: WEF. https://www.weforum.org/reports/global-future-council-ai